Help end medical misogyny. Sign our petition.

Help end medical misogyny.
Sign our petition.

Sign the petition

Please or to access all these features

News

Henry Nowak - just watched the video for the first time

1000 replies

EvangelicalAboutButteredToast · Yesterday 06:57

I don’t understand how the officers could not tell he had been stabbed. He repeatedly says he can’t breathe and when he says he has been stabbed, they say, ‘I don’t think so mate.’ When he says it again they ask where and he says his face, they then roll him over so they can look at his face, and the video ends with the officer saying the handcuffed victim was likely going to be sick.

i completely understand the officers went there having been told a lie and you see the perpetrator on the video retelling the lie and claiming he’d been a victim of a racist assault, i just can’t understand how the officers didn’t recognise the guy on the floor was dying.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
17
Sunglade · Yesterday 16:55

Allisnotlost1 · Yesterday 16:51

What did you mean by referring to Sikhs as ‘foreign men’?

Some of them are some of them aren't. They're actually a fairly small minority with a proportionately larger number that are British. But they're all allowed to carry lethal weapons regardless, whilst women are expected to defend themselves with umbrellas. It's all fine though don't worry, as long as we don't offend anyone 😉

Allisnotlost1 · Yesterday 16:55

EasternStandard · Yesterday 16:55

Of course not. Just scroll back, I’m just not repeating what I’ve already posted. It’s easy to follow if you read posts to you.

ETA ‘bad faith’ is nonsense. It’s called doing other stuff and asking you to just read.

Edited

It’s also easy to say what you mean, but for some reason you won’t. No problem.

Thedevilhasfinallycaughtupwithhim · Yesterday 16:56

Bringemout · Yesterday 16:53

The knife digwa used wasn’t a kirpan and was already illegal and if had been found with it then it should have been removed and he should have been charged for carrying it. Most stabbings in the UK are with kitchen knives.

He would have had that knife whether he was a baptised sikh or not because he was a giant prick.

It was

Henry Nowak - just watched the video for the first time
SnappyQuoter · Yesterday 16:56

On every thread from an OP struggling to find money for food, posters recommend going to a Sikh temple because they feed everyone, and how good they are as a group and that they will help you and won’t turn you away.

But now… they’re not British, they’re all foreigners and their religion doesn’t belong in the UK so they all need to leave because this is Britain, with British values and they’re all foreigners.

Disgusting racists doing exactly what Henry’s family asked people not to do.

Thedevilhasfinallycaughtupwithhim · Yesterday 16:56

Sunglade · Yesterday 16:55

Some of them are some of them aren't. They're actually a fairly small minority with a proportionately larger number that are British. But they're all allowed to carry lethal weapons regardless, whilst women are expected to defend themselves with umbrellas. It's all fine though don't worry, as long as we don't offend anyone 😉

Don’t offend men*

EasternStandard · Yesterday 16:57

Allisnotlost1 · Yesterday 16:55

It’s also easy to say what you mean, but for some reason you won’t. No problem.

Because I said it earlier, scroll back.

Thedevilhasfinallycaughtupwithhim · Yesterday 16:57

SnappyQuoter · Yesterday 16:56

On every thread from an OP struggling to find money for food, posters recommend going to a Sikh temple because they feed everyone, and how good they are as a group and that they will help you and won’t turn you away.

But now… they’re not British, they’re all foreigners and their religion doesn’t belong in the UK so they all need to leave because this is Britain, with British values and they’re all foreigners.

Disgusting racists doing exactly what Henry’s family asked people not to do.

So food bank workers should be allowed to carry knives?

Northermcharn · Yesterday 16:57

Bloozie · Yesterday 16:47

We should all be quoting this post so it gets airtime.

Along with this quote from Henry's father:
“We want to use Henry’s heartbreaking story to make change for the better. We do not want his death to be used to create further division, hatred or tension. We want his story to help make our streets safer for everyone."

The rhetoric from folk like Farage, and some folk on here, is disgusting.

The police failed Henry, so so badly. It's heartbreaking. Even if he was racist, even if he was the aggressor - by refusing him medical help, they were opening the door to his defence getting him off. It's a gross dereliction of duty however you look at it, made all the worse by the fact he was completely innocent, and all officers involved deserve the harshest punishment.

Everything else is just fucking noise and point scoring over a beautiful dead boy.

Can we not? Can we not just behave like grown ups?

Edited

No. I'm sorry. You using those individual police officers as scape goats is disgusting. They were following police systemic racist policy. This is a much wider problem. If you don't understand that I can't help you.

I know what the poor father of HN said, and I wish it was that easy. But sadly this is an issue bigger than this one horrific racist murder.

Is Digwa the biggest gift Reform has had - probably. And that is not good, nobody sane wants Reform in power. However the more people pretend that 2 tier policing isn't a thing, the more likely they are to win power. If Starmer and Labour continue to kowtow to anyone but white tax payers - the worse it will be. But Labour do not seem to be listening.

Bringemout · Yesterday 16:57

Thedevilhasfinallycaughtupwithhim · Yesterday 16:54

I don’t think they’re dangerous as a group.

I just don’t think any religious group should be above the law.

I don’t completely disagree, theres a case for harmonising with legally recognisable limits such as 3 inch swiss army blades which are legal to carry? Perhaps something like that?

The tone of some of this is panic around sikhs which is a bit bewildering for a group thats not particularly criminal and generally all round good citizens.

Paperbackwrither · Yesterday 16:58

Thedevilhasfinallycaughtupwithhim · Yesterday 16:56

It was

Do you believe everything criminals claim?

Allisnotlost1 · Yesterday 16:58

Sunglade · Yesterday 16:55

Some of them are some of them aren't. They're actually a fairly small minority with a proportionately larger number that are British. But they're all allowed to carry lethal weapons regardless, whilst women are expected to defend themselves with umbrellas. It's all fine though don't worry, as long as we don't offend anyone 😉

Then why did use that phrasing?

Sikh women also carry kirpan. Personally I see no problem with that religious exemption, but that any Sikh using it as a weapon should be sentenced the same as anyone else who had taken the knife to the scene (ie starting point of 25 years for an adult). Digwa was not sentenced on that basis, and I would expect that this will be reviewed under ULS.

Paperbackwrither · Yesterday 16:58

Bringemout · Yesterday 16:57

I don’t completely disagree, theres a case for harmonising with legally recognisable limits such as 3 inch swiss army blades which are legal to carry? Perhaps something like that?

The tone of some of this is panic around sikhs which is a bit bewildering for a group thats not particularly criminal and generally all round good citizens.

Edited

Or wooden/ plastic/ jade pendants.

Bringemout · Yesterday 16:59

Paperbackwrither · Yesterday 16:58

Do you believe everything criminals claim?

It wasn’t he had a kirpan, it was still on his person, he used a different kind of blade. It’s in the court summary.

Twisterlollies · Yesterday 16:59

Bringemout · Yesterday 16:57

I don’t completely disagree, theres a case for harmonising with legally recognisable limits such as 3 inch swiss army blades which are legal to carry? Perhaps something like that?

The tone of some of this is panic around sikhs which is a bit bewildering for a group thats not particularly criminal and generally all round good citizens.

Edited

I’m not panicking about Sikhs at all, I think they’re probably less likely to be criminals than whites.

I just believe in the Rule of Law and not creating tiers of society and special exemptions for people that are part of religious or cultural groups. Because that’s a basic tenement of the Rule of Law.

piscofrisco · Yesterday 17:00

Thedevilhasfinallycaughtupwithhim · Yesterday 16:40

When you supported Sikhs being able to carry knives.
The purpose, is for self defence.

No it isn’t. It’s to protect the weak from tyranny as it happens. Symbolically. And never to be used as an offensive weapon. Which to my knowledge it never has been in this country.

Bringemout · Yesterday 17:00

Paperbackwrither · Yesterday 16:58

Or wooden/ plastic/ jade pendants.

Well then if we are concerned about everyone following the same law just band swiss army knives too..

Thedevilhasfinallycaughtupwithhim · Yesterday 17:00

Paperbackwrither · Yesterday 16:58

Do you believe everything criminals claim?

The only thing that makes a Kirpan a “religious symbol that has to be carried around” rather than an illegal offensive weapon is a “claim”.

Allisnotlost1 · Yesterday 17:00

Northermcharn · Yesterday 16:57

No. I'm sorry. You using those individual police officers as scape goats is disgusting. They were following police systemic racist policy. This is a much wider problem. If you don't understand that I can't help you.

I know what the poor father of HN said, and I wish it was that easy. But sadly this is an issue bigger than this one horrific racist murder.

Is Digwa the biggest gift Reform has had - probably. And that is not good, nobody sane wants Reform in power. However the more people pretend that 2 tier policing isn't a thing, the more likely they are to win power. If Starmer and Labour continue to kowtow to anyone but white tax payers - the worse it will be. But Labour do not seem to be listening.

What would Labour ‘listening’ consist of or look like to you?

Bringemout · Yesterday 17:01

Twisterlollies · Yesterday 16:59

I’m not panicking about Sikhs at all, I think they’re probably less likely to be criminals than whites.

I just believe in the Rule of Law and not creating tiers of society and special exemptions for people that are part of religious or cultural groups. Because that’s a basic tenement of the Rule of Law.

As I said then we should look at current legislation around blades and think about what a solution looks like.

3 inch limit, allows sikhs to carry a kirpan as part if their religious observance whilst also aligning with current laws in a reasonable way.

frindolion · Yesterday 17:02

Are you a bully?

MaturingCheeseball · Yesterday 17:03

I know a lot of Sikh people. In fact ds’s best friend is a Sikh and we socialise with his family. The family of the killer were bad people. They are not representative of Sikhs.

However, this case has shone a light on a) the right to carry a knife and b) the notion that by crying “racist” you can divert law enforcement or in fact trump the truth and indeed c) that the authorities (any authorities) have been indoctrinated or cowed into making racism not simply a priority but the priority, along with “community relations”.

Thedevilhasfinallycaughtupwithhim · Yesterday 17:03

piscofrisco · Yesterday 17:00

No it isn’t. It’s to protect the weak from tyranny as it happens. Symbolically. And never to be used as an offensive weapon. Which to my knowledge it never has been in this country.

“Protect the weak” but it’s not self defence.

“symbolically” but it HAS to be a full size knife and not something symbolic like a piece of jewellery with tiny knife pendant.

Sure.

piscofrisco · Yesterday 17:05

Thedevilhasfinallycaughtupwithhim · Yesterday 17:03

“Protect the weak” but it’s not self defence.

“symbolically” but it HAS to be a full size knife and not something symbolic like a piece of jewellery with tiny knife pendant.

Sure.

Protect the weak is literally the opposite of self defence. So yes. Sure.

Northermcharn · Yesterday 17:05

As Kemi Badenoch said

'I don’t want to hear about Black Lives Matter.
I don’t want to hear about White Lives Matter.
Everyone matters. Henry Nowak matters'

We just need Starmer to say the same, and act upon it to show he means it. Given he is PM and has you now, power. Chances?

@Allisnotlost1

Cailleach1 · Yesterday 17:05

Bringemout · Yesterday 16:53

The knife digwa used wasn’t a kirpan and was already illegal and if had been found with it then it should have been removed and he should have been charged for carrying it. Most stabbings in the UK are with kitchen knives.

He would have had that knife whether he was a baptised sikh or not because he was a giant prick.

No doubt he’s a rotten apple. And, his brother, I think. I wonder if the brother is still able to carry his knives, certainly as he seems to have been lying, and instrumental/ complicit in obstructing justice in a fatal stabbing.

I think earlier on in the thread someone pasted about the murder weapon. It is a special extra religious knife for a special grouping/ ‘warriors’ within the religion. Maybe ‘Teutonic knights’ equivalent or something. It was under the 9 inch limit allowed as well. I can’t remember if it was also given the special religious exemption.

I suppose the fact there is a religious exemption throws up all sorts of questions. Like, will VG be able to carry his knives around in prison?

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread