Henry Nowak - just watched the video for the first time

[EvangelicalAboutButteredToast]

I don’t understand how the officers could not tell he had been stabbed. He repeatedly says he can’t breathe and when he says he has been stabbed, they say, ‘I don’t think so mate.’ When he says it again they ask where and he says his face, they then roll him over so they can look at his face, and the video ends with the officer saying the handcuffed victim was likely going to be sick.

i completely understand the officers went there having been told a lie and you see the perpetrator on the video retelling the lie and claiming he’d been a victim of a racist assault, i just can’t understand how the officers didn’t recognise the guy on the floor was dying.

Thank you
They never address the points, do they?
Because they can't

The phone call by the brother to 999 has just been released. Well this explains why the police reacted the way they did doesn’t it?! I think lessons are going to be learned from this going forward. I know the mother is going to be sentenced but I haven’t heard anything about the brother and the fact that he also lied to the police in this phone call.

www.dailymail.com/news/article-15866675/henry-nowak-murder-killers-brother-told-police.html

Why did this scum actually stab Henry?

Just why? His family are truly the scum of the earth, Mother, brother. They should rot in hell.

You can carry a kirpan but not wear a Jewish star. Both religious symbols and both treated totally differently....https://www.telegraph.co.uk/world-news/2026/06/01/jewish-woman-star-david-pendant-out-sauna-spain/?recomm_id=978b7cb2-7328-403a-85b5-753bdfc24968

there are 2 sentences in the post I replied to. Read the second one again so you understand my comment, which is not what you want to derail it into

Wow, he needs to be put in jail too.

of all the aspects of this horrific incident that was the one you decided to focus on. The inference of you doing so is obvious and no, the check for injuries was far from "doing everything right"

Because they ignored the evidence of their own eyes and simply saw the race of the victim and the race of the murderer and the fact that the Brown perpetrator had accused the White victim of racism.

Race is integral to this whole thing.

If you acknowledge that “The Police deal with lots of people who say all sorts of things, most of which are not true.” then why wasn’t that the case when a White lad was accused of racism? Because of racial bias ie racism.

It was racist in the same way as the Stephen Lawrence police encounter was racist: because of the assumptions made by the police and the time lost as a result. Time that could potentially have saved his life - and I know they’re saying not, but that’s irrelevant because 1) they didn’t know that at the time, and 2) there has been so much poor reporting on this that we can’t yet be sure that this is necessarily true.

But the main point is that they didn’t know that, so it’s not relevant to why they didn’t act properly.

'They tried to save him once they realised their mistake'

He was collapsed, clearly something catastrophic had occurred. After a minute of doing fuck all except cuff him a pc mumbles oh his pupils are fixed. I mean seriously they tried to save him?!

Once on scene they should've immediately called for an ambulance and immediately initiated first aid. That would been trying to save him.

Don't be so ridiculous. It's completely relevant.

That rat needs a sentence now, racist liars 😡

So let’s legalise everything because people will do it regardless..?

They are. But not the kind this murder was committed with.

How did the mum and dad get there so quickly? Did the murder happen outside the murderers house?

I called them disgusting (which they are) for trying to shoehorn their own obsession into this man's death.

You are wrong. Read the sentencing remarks. This was a second, religious, knife also permitted for religious reasons.

No lets not make irrelevant things illegal under the guise of fighting serious violence.

It really isnt.

@Emilesgranmade quite a thought provoking observation. You are the one who brought the weird “gender conspiracy” into it.

It didn't sound to me like she was trying to blame the males involved whilst absolving the female officer…if that’s what you mean?

Points about trans people are irrelevant to the murder of this man by another man.

That's irrelevant as the incident happened in Spain and there are no laws against displaying a Jewish star in the UK (or Spain) that I'm aware of

No you’re projecting.

It’s not even the first aspect of the case that I posted about on this thread, for one thing. Nor did I say she was the only female officer there. I actually read previously that three women officers attended, so I definitely wasn’t saying she was the only one because I don’t know that.

But I am suggesting that the one (female) police officer who seems to have made some effort to check whether Henry Nowak was stabbed may well have been the female police officer we are told has resigned. If that’s the case, it’s not her sex that’s the problem, it’s the habit of removing personnel whose testimony may be awkward for the institution that bothers me.

(If it turns out that she was the only female officer on the ground, that would be an interesting case to consider every time we are told that female police officers shouldn’t attend incidents because they aren’t capable of doing the job. However we really are not there yet.)

Meanwhile, look at the beam in your eye instead of trying to find a mote in mine.

Absolutely devastating, I can’t imagine the pain his parents and loved ones must be in.

I hope that each of the police officers involved is deeply ashamed of their actions that night. That a young man died in fear, pleading for help is unconscionable. I truly hope it haunts them.