Help end medical misogyny. Sign our petition.

Help end medical misogyny.
Sign our petition.

Sign the petition

Please or to access all these features

News

Henry Nowak - just watched the video for the first time

1000 replies

EvangelicalAboutButteredToast · Yesterday 06:57

I don’t understand how the officers could not tell he had been stabbed. He repeatedly says he can’t breathe and when he says he has been stabbed, they say, ‘I don’t think so mate.’ When he says it again they ask where and he says his face, they then roll him over so they can look at his face, and the video ends with the officer saying the handcuffed victim was likely going to be sick.

i completely understand the officers went there having been told a lie and you see the perpetrator on the video retelling the lie and claiming he’d been a victim of a racist assault, i just can’t understand how the officers didn’t recognise the guy on the floor was dying.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
17
NeuroticGingerCat · Yesterday 10:48

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Honestly!! it's exhausting- the pretending not to understand- but here goes- ok keep it to race- if you make racism the worst thing possible and if you call anything and everything racism to boot- and the result of any infraction is to be shunned socially, then we tend to fall in line and stay quiet- furthermore, others no doubt like your good self positively relish in the moral superiority that adherence to this can confer- not just staying quiet but lambasting any transgressors.
I can almost feel your virtue.
I've come to realise that every tyrannical movement, ideology or despot completely relies on useful idiots to give it legitmacy and create an environment of fear. This is what you've helped to sustain- well done.

Differentforgirls · Yesterday 10:49

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

I honestly don't think they can.

TheHateUGive · Yesterday 10:49

Genevieva · Yesterday 10:47

It’s been common for a long time. The number of young, mostly black, mostly men killed in London was all over the news 20 years ago. Largely gang related. Kids getting drawn in to drug trafficking and it goes from there. Really sad. Often kids who are vulnerable in some way, frequently from broken homes where Dad doesn’t bother and Mum is trying to make ends meet. Their grandparents were often lovely wholesome Churchgoing Christians who had were trying to hold the family together and completely out of their depth when it came to the underworld their grandchildren had become part of.

The first one i remember making headlines news was when Wayne and Corey were shot in Hackney. Before that, there were murders every week. I went to school with a 15 year old boy in the late 90s who was shot with a machine gun 5 times. He lived and it never hit any major organs. Wasn't even in our local paper.

Gasp0deTheW0nderD0g · Yesterday 10:50

dancedallnight · Yesterday 10:44

I have just seen an article on BBC news, why is this only just being published now when it happened last year? I also saw the body cam footage, where had he actually been hurt and how were the police not able to see?

Read the judge's sentencing remarks. It's all in there. Not that long and in reasonably plain language. /https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Digwa-Final-Sentencing-Remarks.pdf

Differentforgirls · Yesterday 10:50

2031MummyTBC · Yesterday 10:31

Nope she’s right and makes a coherent point.

What if we say please? It's shameful they way you hijack tragedies like this.

MSDOUBTFIRE · Yesterday 10:51

This was racism in its finest ! Just because he was a young white male ! I am very pro police but this was descipicable.

ByQuaintAzureWasp · Yesterday 10:52

EvangelicalAboutButteredToast · Yesterday 07:22

I listened to his dad talking on the steps yesterday. He said the female police officer had resigned and this hadn’t helped with the further investigation. I don’t know how that’s allowed quite honestly. If you have failed to do your job properly you should still be held accountable if someone has died, you shouldn’t be able to resign yourself away from the responsibility.

Because she thought it was the right thing to do. Too many Officers get suspended on full pay pending a lengthy investigation when they know damned well what they did was wrong.

Gasp0deTheW0nderD0g · Yesterday 10:52

Emilesgran · Yesterday 10:07

What’s particularly concerning IMO is the family’s reaction. If it had been “just one nutcase” who had defiled his own religion, they should have been disgusted by his behaviour and helped the police. Instead they did that thing that religions of all sorts do, and prioritised protecting the religion’s reputation by covering up a crime. For that reason alone, the exemption needs to be removed. Because they’ve shown that their religion is no different to any other in that respect, and no other religion gets a deadly weapon exemption, so nor should theirs.

I doubt very much their first thought was protecting Sikhism. Like a great many families and friends all over the world and all through time they protected a loved one, even as he was proving he didn't deserve their protection.

EasternStandard · Yesterday 10:52

Gasp0deTheW0nderD0g · Yesterday 10:47

If you read the judge's sentencing remarks, which have been linked, he says that the murderer stabbed Henry in the chest and severed a vein. There was a great deal of internal bleeding to the chest cavity. Two pints of blood there at the post mortem. By the time the police arrived there was nothing anybody could have done to save him, sadly. He had other stab wounds but the one to the chest was by far the most serious.

An 18 year old was stabbed, handcuffed and wrongly accused. His pleas were ignored with ‘I don’t think so mate’. Only a few are as unmoved by it as this.

Emilesgran · Yesterday 10:52

godmum56 · Yesterday 10:46

from what I have seen, she was the one who realised they had got it wrong and was ignored by the other police.

I wonder if she was pushed into resigning as a way of preventing her testimony from harming the other officers.

Wot23 · Yesterday 10:52

TheHateUGive · Yesterday 10:29

No you need better methods of identifying people at high risk of perpetrating crime. Skin colour isn't a good way of doing that.

so a method informed by statistical analysis of knife crime perpetrators perhaps..... ?

RoboBoogie · Yesterday 10:53

CoralOP · Yesterday 10:33

In that case it would make complete sense to stop watching these channels and watch other channels who don't have these restrictions instead of being spoon-fed information.
These other media outlets show videos where people can see for themselves the crimes and who is commiting them. They say suspects names where the mainstream media won't. Some of it is withheld by law, obviously, but a lot of details are kept quote by some organisations whilst others are freely giving the information out.

Why would I do that though? The channels that I watch or listen to report when the facts are actually placed before a jury in court.

I don't want to hear speculation. I only want to hear opinions once all the facts have been put before me. That's why I do things like actively read the judge's comments to the court.

I am just as upset about the death of Henry Nowak as you seem to be and I know that one of the reasons he died apart from being stabbed by the perpetrator was because of the way that the police responded to the stabbing.

I also want to see the Kirpan banned in this country and for a small symbol to be worn around the neck just in the way a cross or a star of david is worn.

Just because I read mainstream media doesn't mean I don't have opinions of my own. I do believe that racism towards Henry was why, when he was lying on the ground dying, he was still being put in handcuffs and the brown man who stabbed him remained uncuffed.

Gasp0deTheW0nderD0g · Yesterday 10:54

EasternStandard · Yesterday 10:52

An 18 year old was stabbed, handcuffed and wrongly accused. His pleas were ignored with ‘I don’t think so mate’. Only a few are as unmoved by it as this.

I don't understand why you've said this in response to my post. I was answering the question why there wasn't blood visible and yet he had been fatally stabbed. The police officer's response was unspeakably cold. That goes without saying, surely.

Wot23 · Yesterday 10:55

Emilesgran · Yesterday 10:52

I wonder if she was pushed into resigning as a way of preventing her testimony from harming the other officers.

why feel the need to inflate it into a gender conspiracy ?

it could be that she was overwhelmed with disgust at her own actions in failing to carry out a "proper" check for injuries as shown in the body cam video

Emilesgran · Yesterday 10:56

Gasp0deTheW0nderD0g · Yesterday 10:52

I doubt very much their first thought was protecting Sikhism. Like a great many families and friends all over the world and all through time they protected a loved one, even as he was proving he didn't deserve their protection.

So it’s not about religion at all then? In that case people need to stop arguing that the exemption is justified, because it’s really just another instance of the fallacy of assuming that any particular category of males can be considered to be safe.
So get rid of the exemption that says that Sikh men are different and safer than other men. No legal knives for anyone.

MenopauseSucks · Yesterday 10:57

The video is horrific & I can’t imagine the feelings Henry Nowak’s family when it was shown in court. Thank heavens for police body cams.

I think the wearing of Kirpan in public should be banned now as a matter of public & community safety.
If you didn’t know before that Sikhs carry a knife for religious reasons, you do now.
If they continue to carry them they are making themselves vulnerable to attack.
The length or sharpness of the blade doesn’t matter, you can still do a lot of damage with them.
It’ll be easy to attack them, you don’t even need a weapon as they’ll already be carrying them.
Likewise their knives can be taken from them & used by others on others.
I’m not saying that Kirpans can be no longer used for religious purposes. They can be kept at a Gurdwara during worship & celebration & stored there safely when not being used.
I realise that the kirpan should be carried at all times as per their religion but sadly for community safety, this should change. We’re living in a different world now.

Yes I know the blade used by Digwa was considerably larger than a kirpan but as a member of Sikhs called the Nihang, he was allowed to carry a second weapon larger than a traditional kirpan & it can be worn fully visible, within easy reach. He was able to lawfully carry the blade as it was for religious reasons.

Viviennemary · Yesterday 10:57

It is so awful. I couldn't bear to watch it on the news. His family will never recover from this.

TheHateUGive · Yesterday 10:57

Wot23 · Yesterday 10:52

so a method informed by statistical analysis of knife crime perpetrators perhaps..... ?

Which would reveal that poverty, substandard education/exclusion, and famiky breakdown are the most common traits in perpetrators of knife crime.

TwoPercentForLookingInTheMirrorTwice · Yesterday 10:57

TheHateUGive · Yesterday 10:47

It doesnt connect to any wider issue related to trans people. It has nothing to do with it at all. If you agree with that, you should be shutting it down, too.

She explained how it connects to a wider societal issue in the post you responded to. Nothing else needed to be said, but you are the one who derailed because you couldn’t accept the opinion. You keep calling people disgusting and slamming their viewpoint simply because you disagree with their belief, and you are wilfully blind to the actual point that they were making. And perhaps it suits your bias to contribute to the derailment of this thread. Some people will do anything to avoid the subject.

But nothing more needs to be said about the wider issue. I think @NeuroticGingerCat explained it well, so what’s more to be said? You don’t see it, but who cares? You don’t need to argue the toss about your thoughts on fucking gender. It’s not the time or place.

Tortoisel · Yesterday 10:59

I don’t understand how this has happened.

The murderer rung the police to say he’s been the victim of a racist attack and they just turn up like that?

I read somewhere initially a member of the public called to say someone had been stabbed. I can’t see that anywhere now.

I cant believe in his dying moments that he had his face in the ground and hand cuffs on. And they never cuffed the murderer. Even after they realised they had helped kill his victim. I am sorry what. What the fuck is actually going on!!!!

tiredallthetimeandfedup · Yesterday 11:00

MenopauseSucks · Yesterday 10:57

The video is horrific & I can’t imagine the feelings Henry Nowak’s family when it was shown in court. Thank heavens for police body cams.

I think the wearing of Kirpan in public should be banned now as a matter of public & community safety.
If you didn’t know before that Sikhs carry a knife for religious reasons, you do now.
If they continue to carry them they are making themselves vulnerable to attack.
The length or sharpness of the blade doesn’t matter, you can still do a lot of damage with them.
It’ll be easy to attack them, you don’t even need a weapon as they’ll already be carrying them.
Likewise their knives can be taken from them & used by others on others.
I’m not saying that Kirpans can be no longer used for religious purposes. They can be kept at a Gurdwara during worship & celebration & stored there safely when not being used.
I realise that the kirpan should be carried at all times as per their religion but sadly for community safety, this should change. We’re living in a different world now.

Yes I know the blade used by Digwa was considerably larger than a kirpan but as a member of Sikhs called the Nihang, he was allowed to carry a second weapon larger than a traditional kirpan & it can be worn fully visible, within easy reach. He was able to lawfully carry the blade as it was for religious reasons.

This is a good point. One of the main arguments as to why women can't carry self-defense items such as pepper spray or indeed a knife is that it'll be used against them even though when women are attacked by men there is a huge differential in power and strength (so the obvious initial analysis is that they should be allowed defensive weapons only to be used when under attack).

Why doesn't this argument also hold for Sikhs? Are only Sikh men allowed to wear these? Because that's a bit sexist if so.

Emilesgran · Yesterday 11:00

Wot23 · Yesterday 10:55

why feel the need to inflate it into a gender conspiracy ?

it could be that she was overwhelmed with disgust at her own actions in failing to carry out a "proper" check for injuries as shown in the body cam video

Who did that? You apparently. I just used correct pronouns. I made no generalisation about sex or gender.

it’s not my doing if the officer who resigned seems to have been the only one who did anything right, and was ignored by other officers whose sex I don’t know.

We do hear at least one male talking, as well as the woman who wanted to check his injuries, but that doesn’t mean there were no other female officers attending and I never said there weren’t.

Gasp0deTheW0nderD0g · Yesterday 11:00

Wot23 · Yesterday 10:52

so a method informed by statistical analysis of knife crime perpetrators perhaps..... ?

Are you suggesting that Sikhs are disproportionately likely to be perpetrators of knife crime? Do you have evidence of this?

Alexandra2001 · Yesterday 11:01

MSDOUBTFIRE · Yesterday 10:51

This was racism in its finest ! Just because he was a young white male ! I am very pro police but this was descipicable.

I'm actually not particularly pro police but ...

Why was it racist when the first officers on the scene didn't realise he had been stabbed?

The Police deal with lots of people who say all sorts of things, most of which are not true.

They tried to save him once they realised their mistake.

Emilesgran · Yesterday 11:02

tiredallthetimeandfedup · Yesterday 11:00

This is a good point. One of the main arguments as to why women can't carry self-defense items such as pepper spray or indeed a knife is that it'll be used against them even though when women are attacked by men there is a huge differential in power and strength (so the obvious initial analysis is that they should be allowed defensive weapons only to be used when under attack).

Why doesn't this argument also hold for Sikhs? Are only Sikh men allowed to wear these? Because that's a bit sexist if so.

You’re surprised at a religion - any religion - being sexist?? You’re being sarcastic, right?

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.