The Restore Britain March seems to have gone pretty well today from what I can glean online.

[EvangelicalAboutButteredToast]

It could be a faulty algorithm, but the trouble the PM seemed to think would happen doesn’t seem to have materialised. I’ve seen clips from the march where a diverse mix of people have marched, not just football hooligan types.

Sigh?

Not great about antisemitism. All good about speaking up for oppressed people, especially those facing a double whammy.

If by Arthur, you mean King Arthur, he didn’t exist.

But with you otherwise.

Is it next week we bring back motherhood and apple pie or the week after?

Does anyone know the final turnout numbers for yesterdays marches ie how many for the pro-UK one and how many for the pro-Palestine march? I was looking at the Met's tweet about arrests, but without knowing the numbers on each side, it seemed useless - although it looked like the majority were well behaved.

The nonsense you say I'm talking was actually two quotes of yours 😂

EvangelicalAboutButteredToast. Today 08:39
I didn’t march yesterday and don’t condone racist chants from anyone.
EvangelicalAboutButteredToast · Yesterday 20:47
I rather like the chants of Keir Starmer’s a wanker 🤣

Hi ForWittyTeaOP - what point is being stretched? That an empire defeated the Nazis (true, the US turned up late - again - after spending a couple of years supplying Germany and probably shortened the war by 2 years) or that Magna Carta has something to do with being British? Clueless as to your meaning.

Oh call your solicitor if you're so hurt. 🙄 Go away.

You will get nowhere with a defamation or libel action - and you probably wouldn't be able to afford it either. There are laws against libel and defamation but you are anon. No one knows who you are. You haven't suffered any reputational damage

Honest opinion is a defence to defamation. In any case, there's no reputational damage to you because no one knows who you are in real life.

60k for pro Uk

Which you have posted alongside each other to prove what exactly?

I need to sue the person that called me a lazy scrounger on one of the benefits threads yesterday. :)

I’m afraid you can’t hide behind message boards to defame people.

They (the organizers I assume) were however distributing large crosses to the marchers yesterday

Ben Habib spoke yesterday. He's a member of Advance Uk and he was born in Pakistan. That's the person who was being referred to earlier probably

I thought you were gone for the next week?

How do Jews who recognise the racism of the pro-Palestinian marches feel about being told there is no problem because Jews attend ?

I was defamed all over the Internet by a group of people who were harassing me for over a year. They knew my real name which was posted. No one is going to win a defamation action unless they have money. Or someone willing to take a case on for free and generally where someone has lost work or income due to the person's posts.

Do you think if you show a solicitor this thread that they'll take a case on for you?

You can't defame someone whose identity is completely unknown to you. No one knows your real name, where you live, or anything that would identify you. Therefore you have not been defamed.

I am here for this libel case. I foresee Wagatha Christie levels of entertainment.

Just that really. Do you believe the war could have been won without the US? Or that it was a straight fight between good and evil?

I'm here for it too.

Here is the act,

Defamation Act 2013 (legislation.gov.uk)

Here is a layers guide to it.

Online Defamation in the UK: How to Take Legal Action - Lawyer Mag

Here is a bit from the latter:

1. Be false and damaging to the claimant’s reputation.
2. Be published to at least one person other than the claimant.
3. Cause, or be likely to cause, serious harm to the claimant’s reputation (as per the Defamation Act 2013).

Italics are the quote. So if nobody knows who you are, given that this is an anonymous forum, how can your reputation be damaged?

I am not a lawyer. Just interested.

Edit spelling. I typed "not" (last sentence) as "now" in error.

That you are contradicting yourself.

EvangelicalAboutButteredToast. Today 08:39
I didn’t march yesterday and don’t condone racist chants from anyone.
EvangelicalAboutButteredToast · Yesterday 20:47
I rather like the chants of Keir Starmer’s a wanker 🤣

Arthur is the only legendary one - Boudicca is attested by, I think, Tacitus, also Suetonius and Cassius Dio - and Arthur is only legendary because we don't know to whom the honorific 'Artoris' (the bear) was assigned. None of the others are legendary, though legends have gathered about them, e.g. Llewellyn the Last has attached to him that he lived on in spirit after his death at Cilmeri in 1282 and was seen riding away, possibly weeping (well he might, about a house divided falling, which is how Wales fell). I am pretty sure that Hugh Bigod and Archbishop Anselm (Magna Carta) existed, indeed a few weeks ago I met someone claiming descent from Hugh Bigod.
So who, apart from possibly Arthur, is mythological here?
Also I am sure that those on the UTK march do know about them and care about them, along with English pubs, Scots dancing, the history of Wales and the fact that the thugs in Iran have not been condemned by our government as murderers (or did you not see the lion and sun flag of Iran?).
Do go and lie down.

Why do you think Mumsnet deletes posts? It’s literally to avoid court cases. Anyone that thinks they have the right to maraude around online accusing people of accepting payment for posts most be delusional, particularly in the era we live in. Anyone sensible would admit they got a bit carried away and stopped digging the hole. I’m happy to be called pathetic and I’m pretty reasonable when it comes to arguing my politics as I’m aware this is a left wing site, but doubling down on accusations of being a shill is unacceptable.