MrsMattie,
I couldn't care less about MM.
As Barking tells, see former posting by her, she started this thread to try to influence someone who might know MM to contact her and tell her to read the latest mega thread on WE here at MN, as barking seems to think MM has read somethng I have written, and that that might have made her choose a Waldorf school for her child or children.
In response, I expressed my disagreement with barking, see earlier posting. I suggested that 32 Ofsted inspection reports of Steiner daycare centers and independent schools would be a better source of info than the latest MN mega thread.
When Mamazon asked what Waldorf schools were, see former posting, I answered her former posting, former posting. I also told about the background for and nature of the discussions in the mega thread, and the role played by a gang of WCs in the discussion. I also added more sources on WE; a DFES study and articles by the BBC and The independent.
After some discussion of some misleading statements Northern has made about me, barking for some unclear reason started insinuating that I had "never played with another woman's bottom" posting in question and then again insisted on repeating the question.
Is that female British argumentation technique today, or just Mumsnet standard argumentation method, when you feel you're losing a discussion?
I don' care very much if I discuss with men or women here in thus forum, why should I, I discuss with individuals and I couldn't care less about MM, that I know next to nothing about.