Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

News
Thread gallery
6
NigelHarmansNewWife · 05/06/2024 11:38

@Sprogonthetyne I don't disagree with you - I thought DP's view was very narrow and is likely to be wrong!

CaveMum · 05/06/2024 11:44

NigelHarmansNewWife · 05/06/2024 11:37

@Southlondoner88 why do you say offgrid and what proof of that do you have?

I take off grid to mean she is not registered with any local services - GP/midwife services would be aware of the pregnancies; social services would be aware if she was a vulnerable adult that had been born in the UK or indeed if anyone had raised concerns about a friend/neighbour they are worried about; no schools have raised concerns about a teenage girl (assuming she could have been a teen for the first pregnancy in 2017) being pregnant or going missing; no missing persons reports flagged up.

NigelHarmansNewWife · 05/06/2024 11:52

I know what I think that means @CaveMum too, but I've asked @Southlondoner88 as it was she who posted that

Allthehorsesintheworld · 05/06/2024 13:26

Westfacing · 05/06/2024 08:29

I can't see how it's in the public interest to know that these three children are full siblings - what do we gain from it?

Only thing I can think of is it might trigger someone’s memory. They’d see a pregnant woman then no baby , then saw same woman pregnant again and no baby. It’s a very small chance I think that anyone would remember and be able to identify the mother.

Investinmyself · 05/06/2024 13:29

GreenTeaLikesMe · 04/06/2024 23:43

Have you seen some of the names parents give their kids though? It will affect a child’s life chances if they have to go through life with a stupid name. The poster’s friend probably made the right choice.

Many children will have names changed on adoption as it’s in best interests of child.
A child with a very distinctive name is an easy one to track down if the child has birth family in area. It’s also very obvious if a child is adopted if name is add odds with siblings meaning child may be put on spot - why is your brother called Tom, Sister Katie and you are Prince-Millionaire.

Southlondoner88 · 05/06/2024 13:31

@NigelHarmansNewWife that’s what I mean, off grid can mean a multitude of things. Since nobody knows yet, I’m saying off grid as there are many possibilities but it is more than poverty. Poverty alone doesn’t force a couple into unassisted birth and child abandonment. Not in this country anyway.

SensationalSusie · 05/06/2024 13:39

IHaveNeverLivedintheCastle · 05/06/2024 09:20

Nobody in the UK is so poor that there is no alternative than to leave a new born baby in a park.

The least worst scenario is the parents are illegal immigrants who have somehow survived completely under the radar to the point they think they can't ask for help in a situation where help would be available.

The worst case scenario is a Joseph Fritzl situation.

@IHaveNeverLivedintheCastle

Illegal immigrant is one thing, could also be people with learning disabilities or lack of English who don’t know how to access the benefits system for help, or financial abuse, debt, sending money to their home of origin.

You have to remember they may come from a culture very different to ours. In certain areas of Africa there can be a belief that a baby is a witch and they are then thrown out onto the street.

You can’t judge these people necessarily on expected social norms in the U.K. if they were not brought up in the U.K. (potentially as one way of explaining this awful behaviour).

GreenTeaLikesMe · 05/06/2024 13:41

Investinmyself · 05/06/2024 13:29

Many children will have names changed on adoption as it’s in best interests of child.
A child with a very distinctive name is an easy one to track down if the child has birth family in area. It’s also very obvious if a child is adopted if name is add odds with siblings meaning child may be put on spot - why is your brother called Tom, Sister Katie and you are Prince-Millionaire.

The case I know of basically went:

Child was called….let’s say she was called “Beyonce.”

Parents chose “Bea” as a nickname. (That’s not the name, this is just an example)

At school, they filled in the forms for a known-as name, making it clear she was NEVER to be called anything other than Bea, in speech and in writing.

As soon as it was legally possible, the child changed her name to Beatrice, and continued to use Bea as a nickname.

Parents made the right choice. Being called Beyoncé (or, in reality, an equally stupid name just like Beyoncé) is going to be utterly embarrassing and result in your CV getting binned, in the real world.

NosyJosie · 05/06/2024 13:45

Investinmyself · 05/06/2024 13:29

Many children will have names changed on adoption as it’s in best interests of child.
A child with a very distinctive name is an easy one to track down if the child has birth family in area. It’s also very obvious if a child is adopted if name is add odds with siblings meaning child may be put on spot - why is your brother called Tom, Sister Katie and you are Prince-Millionaire.

Immediately changing my name to Princess Millionaire.

Totally agree - the name given prior to adoption will be in the records and this be in their history there but babies don’t remember these names so fine to change them.

The police is right to be concerned about the mother. I don’t think they would prosecute her, she needs post natal care and mental health support as a priority but in this specific case I think they are also very interested in the family overall. In some of the LLF cases there have been families who kept some children and gave up others due to hardship. From memory, was one man who was given up/foundling and had a good life and found his siblings. They had stayed with the mother and had a thoroughly tough time. It was hard to watch.
There could be more children born to this family living in poor conditions and given the areas of London they found all three, entirely possible.

Investinmyself · 05/06/2024 13:55

The immigration theory is possible if a couple are here illegally and wanting a better life for the children. My gut is baby more likely to have been dressed warmly and left in a church or hospital in that case though.
Publicity is a double edged sword but judge has made decision after hearing all the evidence.
Hope the publicity does assist positively and it jogs someone’s memory enough to allow authorities to make some progress.
It says in report baby doesn’t even have a birth certificate yet so no legal name.

SwimmingSnake · 05/06/2024 13:56

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

Lifeomars · 05/06/2024 14:10

muddyford · 04/06/2024 21:07

That was my first thought, children of the women's father and her.

My thoghts too, I fear that somewhere there is a poor woman or girl who is bing kept somewhere against her will, being abused, conceiving babies, giving birth without medical help and pain relief and then having her babies taken away and left outside . It has really shaken me, that something like this could be happening and nobody is able to help her. Of course this is only one possible scenario, but whatever is happening it's not good

Tomorrowillbeachicken · 05/06/2024 17:59

Made me think of modern day slavery

mandlerparr · 05/06/2024 18:10

I think we are all in agreement that there is some woman locked up somewhere, being abused.

SoupChicken · 05/06/2024 18:10

NigelHarmansNewWife · 05/06/2024 08:00

I haven't read the whole thread since I posted on it yesterday, but I hadn't realised the authorities didn't want it known the three children have the same parents. It was a court which sanctioned the publishing of these details after press agencies argued it was in the public interest to do so.

DP thinks the parents are poor, end of, and can't afford to raise the children. If that is the case that's a pretty damning indictment of our society.

Women do not leave newborn babies in carrier bags on freezing cold nights simply because they are poor, can he not imagine the mental strain it would have on a woman? If it’s anything other than an abusive hostage incestous situation I’ll eat my hat.

OrchardDoor · 05/06/2024 18:39

If they were poor why would they give birth secretively and abandon the baby secretively? They could have the baby on the nhs and give it up for adoption. They'd be able to get free contraception too.

ARichtGoodDram · 05/06/2024 18:50

I don't usually agree with things being made public, but in this case I think it was wise.

I initially thought that, but now I can see why the authorities involved didn’t want it publicised.

It’s quite possibly put the woman in danger, and it’s almost certainly put any further babies in grave danger.

The most dangerous point for a woman in an abusive relationship is when the man starts to feel like he’s losing control of the situation, and this publicity could very easily lead to panic.

BeGutsyCat · 05/06/2024 18:55

SoupChicken · 05/06/2024 18:10

Women do not leave newborn babies in carrier bags on freezing cold nights simply because they are poor, can he not imagine the mental strain it would have on a woman? If it’s anything other than an abusive hostage incestous situation I’ll eat my hat.

I'm sure women do (not saying this in the case here). It's stupid to pretend all women are morally infallible or even decent people.

Annierob · 05/06/2024 19:06

Is it possible the parents are illegal immigrants and are frightened to be sent back to their country? Might be hard to get contraception.

Abouttimeforanamechange · 05/06/2024 19:15

Is it possible the parents are illegal immigrants and are frightened to be sent back to their country? Might be hard to get contraception.

Hard for a woman maybe. A man can go to any high street chemist.

Kjpt140v · 05/06/2024 19:24

SerendipityJane · 04/06/2024 08:28

Somebody, somewhere needs help to prevent this happening again.

DadBodAlready · 05/06/2024 20:22

Rainbowcollar · 04/06/2024 08:56

I hope they are looking for that poor mother. Who knows what is happening to her. Hopefully there’s some way to trace her / the father and work out if she’s vulnerable

The Police have supposedly spent 5 yesterday looking for the mother, and still haven't found her.

I wonder whether they have tried DNA traces, I'm assuming not

DadBodAlready · 05/06/2024 20:31

soupfiend · 05/06/2024 08:32

Exactly, its salacious thats all and thats why the press want to be able to report on Family Court matters, solely for clicks and kicks.

The authorities will have a good idea of who the parents are, even if they cant prove it, even if the parents dont engage, even if there is nothing the authorities can do about the situation, whatever that situation is, so to make it public serves no purpose

What makes you think 'the authorities have a good idea who it is'?
The police claim to have been looking for the parents for 5 yrs, and i seriously doubt Social Services have any idea, they rarely do

soupfiend · 05/06/2024 21:23

IHaveNeverLivedintheCastle · 05/06/2024 08:38

The decision to make it public was made by a family court judge. Judge Carol Atkinson said the story was of "great public interest".

Well she is wrong. Judges are not infallible. Sometimes they make mistakes

MumblesParty · 05/06/2024 21:25

MabelMaybe · 04/06/2024 09:14

That most recent news story says the older ones have already been adopted, but that they are looking at ways of kepeing the three siblings in touch as they get older. I can see that if you were offered the chance to adopt one baby, you wouldn't even consider that other siblings would appear further down the line, so they can't be kept together as a family group.

Someone I knew adopted a baby who was born to a drug addicted couple. 2 years later they got a call from social services - the same couple had had another child, who needed adopting. So they adopted that one too.