Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

News

WTAF? Asylum seekers to be detained across the UK in shock Rwanda operation

494 replies

Tenmus · 28/04/2024 13:54

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2024/apr/28/home-office-to-detain-asylum-seekers-across-uk-in-shock-rwanda-operation

"The Home Office will launch a surprise operation to detain asylum seekers across the UK on Monday in preparation for deportation to Rwanda, weeks earlier than expected, the Guardian understands.
Officials plan to hold refugees who turn up for routine meetings at immigration service offices and will also pick people up nationwide in a two-week exercise.

They will be immediately transferred to detention centres, which have already been prepared for the operation, and held to be put on later flights to Rwanda. Others identified for these flights are already being held."

I am actually shocked by this. A cruel, inhumane action with terrible optics and a colossal waste of money.

Home Office to detain asylum seekers across UK in shock Rwanda operation

Exclusive: Operation comes weeks earlier than expected and is thought to have been timed to coincide with local elections

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2024/apr/28/home-office-to-detain-asylum-seekers-across-uk-in-shock-rwanda-operation

OP posts:
Thread gallery
11
suburburban · 28/04/2024 20:47

Yes I agree

Why can't we pause and see who is actually here and if they are working and contributing and paying taxes.

There must be so much money laundering going on

Polishedshoesalways · 28/04/2024 20:47

GoldenTrout · 28/04/2024 20:45

This is ludicrous. If the Home Office has got the resources to throw at this and the inevitable legal challenges that will follow, why did it not put the same resources into processing the backlog of asylum claims long ago so that the problem would be largely resolved anyway?

Didn't we hear that Rwanda had sold off the accommodation that they were supposed to be putting asylum seekers into? So where are they going to be living?

The legal challenges have already happened or did you miss that part?

Beveren · 28/04/2024 20:48

Brexile · 28/04/2024 14:00

That's appalling. My DCs are friends with asylum seekers (not in the UK). They are just young people like any other. I fully expect sickening stories about human rights abuses from the Rwandan prisons they end up in, if the flights can't be stopped.

My DC is already worried about the two asylum seekers in his class at school. They're about to sit GCSEs, it doesn't sound as if Sunak is about to put that sort of consideration ahead of his electoral ambitions.

Sometimeswinning · 28/04/2024 20:49

Kinshipug · 28/04/2024 20:38

I have now answered your question. Please read my response before launching into your next tirade. Perhaps you could respond to my questions also.
What would I suggest about what? Which plan have I ruled out, where have I said that?

You haven’t answered anything. I’m replying to where you quoted me. Apparently it’s rhetorical and you’ve already answered it. Anymore avoidance comments left?

The whole thread is about the Rwanda plan. Either it’s further avoidance or you’re completely lost. (I’m guessing lost.)

Livelovebehappy · 28/04/2024 20:49

Dymaxion · 28/04/2024 20:35

Possibly not but it would be good to prioritise the people who already live here and let them have affordable housing.

The small boat situation has only been happening since 2018, and the numbers were tiny for the first couple of years, so really only been having an impact for four years. Affordable housing has been an issue for far longer hasn't it ?

But surely that’s irrelevant, as whether it’s been a problem for years or not, its happened, and we are where we are. We have to sort the country out. It’s a shitshow atm, and madness to leave the door open making the situation worse. If Labour do get in and start building these thousands of homes they’re promising us, it won’t happen overnight, and could potentially be years before we have housing back to what it should be (if ever, because Labour are good at over promising and under delivering)

Polishedshoesalways · 28/04/2024 20:50

suburburban · 28/04/2024 20:47

Yes I agree

Why can't we pause and see who is actually here and if they are working and contributing and paying taxes.

There must be so much money laundering going on

Yes a pause for a few years. We can then find decent places for everyone to live. Support them to find work and actually offer a decent quality of life. We are not a bottomless pit of resources!

Not one post ever ever answers the simple question - if they want open migration how on earth do we pay for it? Or do we just become an over populated third world country with no borders whatsoever? Because that’s where we are headed.

We need to get a grip, and fast.

Anonymous2025 · 28/04/2024 20:50

Teentaxidriver · 28/04/2024 20:19

Agreed. These are people who have arrived here illegally. If I went to another country and broke their laws, I would expect to be held to account.

They are not illegal. They requested asylum on arrival as it’s the only way to get it done unless you are Ukrainian

Diggby · 28/04/2024 20:50

Polishedshoesalways · 28/04/2024 20:44

For the love of God. Drug dealers, petty criminals and those looking for a fast buck are not arriving here to work in bloody care homes!!!

You are honestly deluded if you think the boatloads of Nike wearing chaps with Apple Watches and a bank full of cash are here to wipe bottoms!!! Jesus Christ.

You didn't read what I wrote, your knee was jerking so fast.

Obviously drug dealers are not coming here to work in care homes. They're coming here to deal drugs. They don't bother to claim asylum (until they're nicked) because they would prefer not to come to the attention of the authorities.

LEGALLY RESIDENT migrants - as in those who applied for entry clearance and were granted it prior to arriving - do quite often work in care homes. As do a small number of asylum seekers who have the right to work because of systemic delay, as they are only allowed to work in shortage occupations.

GoldenTrout · 28/04/2024 20:51

Bumblebeeinatree · 28/04/2024 14:14

What do the anti Rwanda people want to do with all the asylum seekers and all the ones arriving soon?

I thought it was bonkers initially, but the accommodation in Rwanda looks really nice and a new start in a new country doesn't seem that awful compared with staying in horrible accommodation in the UK indefinitely, and facing hostile locals wherever they are dumped around the country. A hotel was converted for asylum seekers in our local town and I was amazed by the antagonism from local, I thought civilised people.

Labour seem to be going with send them back to France, but would the French accept them back? And wouldn't they just be on the next boat back to the UK.

Or we declare open borders and let everyone in who wants to come and what are the consequences of that?

By all accounts they've solved that accommodation off. So is that more hotel bills for the Home Office, then?

Did you know this was reciprocal? For every asylum seeker Rwanda takes, we are taking a Rwandan. Where are we going to accommodate them?

Kinshipug · 28/04/2024 20:51

Sometimeswinning · 28/04/2024 20:49

You haven’t answered anything. I’m replying to where you quoted me. Apparently it’s rhetorical and you’ve already answered it. Anymore avoidance comments left?

The whole thread is about the Rwanda plan. Either it’s further avoidance or you’re completely lost. (I’m guessing lost.)

Sorry which question have I not answered?
You however have answered none.

Polishedshoesalways · 28/04/2024 20:51

Diggby · 28/04/2024 20:50

You didn't read what I wrote, your knee was jerking so fast.

Obviously drug dealers are not coming here to work in care homes. They're coming here to deal drugs. They don't bother to claim asylum (until they're nicked) because they would prefer not to come to the attention of the authorities.

LEGALLY RESIDENT migrants - as in those who applied for entry clearance and were granted it prior to arriving - do quite often work in care homes. As do a small number of asylum seekers who have the right to work because of systemic delay, as they are only allowed to work in shortage occupations.

We have millions on benefits that could easily work in care homes, we do not need migrants economic or otherwise.

Dymaxion · 28/04/2024 20:52

Affordable housing is a luxury long gone. We are now at the stage of no housing stock at all. Your plan is to build all over the green belt but spend billions on the infrastructure required - it’s absolutely bonkers.

My plan ?

The amount of houses being built locally, on green fields is huge, each big new development is hundreds, the latest one in the pipeline is 4,000 , with as you rightly pointed out no addition to the local infrastructure, no new wards in the local hospital, no new school , no new GP surgeries springing up and this has been happening for a good few years. The cost of housing has rocketed, rents are ridiculous, wages have not increased at anywhere near the same sort of level and getting on the housing ladder is even more unaffordable due to the interest rates.

Diggby · 28/04/2024 20:52

Polishedshoesalways · 28/04/2024 20:51

We have millions on benefits that could easily work in care homes, we do not need migrants economic or otherwise.

Have you seen the shortage occupations list, out of interest?

suburburban · 28/04/2024 20:52

Yes what is the point of Rwanda if we have to take the same number back

Can't the money be better spent stopping them arriving here in the first place

Polishedshoesalways · 28/04/2024 20:53

Anonymous2025 · 28/04/2024 20:50

They are not illegal. They requested asylum on arrival as it’s the only way to get it done unless you are Ukrainian

It is illegal to lie about being persecuted and from a country that is unsafe when actually your country is perfectly safe and your life is not at risk.

Polishedshoesalways · 28/04/2024 20:54

Diggby · 28/04/2024 20:52

Have you seen the shortage occupations list, out of interest?

Yes that needs addressing. We are paying millions of healthy people to stay at home and rot all day.

GoldenTrout · 28/04/2024 20:55

Bumblebeeinatree · 28/04/2024 14:48

I've said I'm not opposed to Rwanda. Most methods of processing people in France or the UK are overwhelmed by numbers and by people destroying their papers so no one knows who they are or where they come from making it very difficult to sort true asylum seekers from economic migrants.

But why are they all so desperate to live in the UK rather than Europe? I really don't understand why the UK is the holy grail. What's so bad about France, Germany, etc that people are willing to risk their lives to get out?

They aren't "all" coming to the UK. France and Germany already take more asylum seekers than the UK does.

Diggby · 28/04/2024 20:55

GoldenTrout · 28/04/2024 20:51

By all accounts they've solved that accommodation off. So is that more hotel bills for the Home Office, then?

Did you know this was reciprocal? For every asylum seeker Rwanda takes, we are taking a Rwandan. Where are we going to accommodate them?

This isn't true. We have committed to taking "a small number of the most vulnerable" refugees from Rwanda but we have not committed to a 1:1 ratio.

fullfact.org/immigration/rwanda-policy-refugees/

Dymaxion · 28/04/2024 20:56

We are paying millions of healthy people to stay at home and rot all day.

Have you seen the NHS waiting list figures ? Also remember that a good chunk of the benefits bill is actually state pension.

Polishedshoesalways · 28/04/2024 20:56

GoldenTrout · 28/04/2024 20:55

They aren't "all" coming to the UK. France and Germany already take more asylum seekers than the UK does.

They have more space.

Polishedshoesalways · 28/04/2024 20:56

Dymaxion · 28/04/2024 20:56

We are paying millions of healthy people to stay at home and rot all day.

Have you seen the NHS waiting list figures ? Also remember that a good chunk of the benefits bill is actually state pension.

Of course that old chestnut 😂

Livelovebehappy · 28/04/2024 20:57

Diggby · 28/04/2024 20:52

Have you seen the shortage occupations list, out of interest?

Hopefully Sunak’s recent plans on getting more of the population back to work and off the sick notes will resolve that. Most of the jobs where we have a shortage are unskilled ones. Get people who choose not to work as a lifestyle choice, back to work.

Polishedshoesalways · 28/04/2024 20:58

GoldenTrout · 28/04/2024 20:55

They aren't "all" coming to the UK. France and Germany already take more asylum seekers than the UK does.

Have you been to Paris lately? Or Marseille? It’s an open air refugee camp, dangerous - filthy and violent. Is that what you want for our country?

Polishedshoesalways · 28/04/2024 20:58

Livelovebehappy · 28/04/2024 20:57

Hopefully Sunak’s recent plans on getting more of the population back to work and off the sick notes will resolve that. Most of the jobs where we have a shortage are unskilled ones. Get people who choose not to work as a lifestyle choice, back to work.

Absolutely. Most of whom are not ill or dying but just lazy and work shy.

GoldenTrout · 28/04/2024 20:59

Bumblebeeinatree · 28/04/2024 14:57

How do you persuade them to stay in their own countries? If they are real asylum seekers they probably can't stay in their own country and if they are not genuine asylum seekers they realise that once they are here half the battle is won, virtually no one gets sent back. And if you return them to their own country (assuming they tell you where that is) what's to stop them just coming back again?

The fact that they know that, their asylum claim having already been processed once, they will not be allowed to stay?

Swipe left for the next trending thread