Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

News

WTAF? Asylum seekers to be detained across the UK in shock Rwanda operation

494 replies

Tenmus · 28/04/2024 13:54

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2024/apr/28/home-office-to-detain-asylum-seekers-across-uk-in-shock-rwanda-operation

"The Home Office will launch a surprise operation to detain asylum seekers across the UK on Monday in preparation for deportation to Rwanda, weeks earlier than expected, the Guardian understands.
Officials plan to hold refugees who turn up for routine meetings at immigration service offices and will also pick people up nationwide in a two-week exercise.

They will be immediately transferred to detention centres, which have already been prepared for the operation, and held to be put on later flights to Rwanda. Others identified for these flights are already being held."

I am actually shocked by this. A cruel, inhumane action with terrible optics and a colossal waste of money.

Home Office to detain asylum seekers across UK in shock Rwanda operation

Exclusive: Operation comes weeks earlier than expected and is thought to have been timed to coincide with local elections

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2024/apr/28/home-office-to-detain-asylum-seekers-across-uk-in-shock-rwanda-operation

OP posts:
Thread gallery
11
Dymaxion · 28/04/2024 20:59

Around 55% of social security expenditure goes to pensioners; in 2024 to 2025 we will spend £167.6 billion on benefits for pensioners in GB . This includes spending on the State Pension which is forecast to be £138.1 billion in 2024 to 2025.

This old chestnut @Polishedshoesalways Grin

Wonderfulstuff · 28/04/2024 21:00

Polishedshoesalways · 28/04/2024 19:59

It’s not funny. Really it isn’t. You might find it funny until your Nana dies in a corridor of a hospital. Or you are made homeless because there is no housing stock left

1.2 million arrived just in one year. So yes it is millions arriving - as they are just the ones that have been recorded.

You really need to start paying attention to the facts.

https://commonslibrary.parliament.uk/research-briefings/sn06077/#:~:text=What%20are%20the%20UK's%20latest,net%20migration%20figure%20of%20672%2C000.

Edited

But what about all the economic migrants working in the nhs?

Livelovebehappy · 28/04/2024 21:01

Dymaxion · 28/04/2024 20:59

Around 55% of social security expenditure goes to pensioners; in 2024 to 2025 we will spend £167.6 billion on benefits for pensioners in GB . This includes spending on the State Pension which is forecast to be £138.1 billion in 2024 to 2025.

This old chestnut @Polishedshoesalways Grin

But the majority of those claiming state pension have paid into the system for years to get it. It’s not ‘free’ money.

Polishedshoesalways · 28/04/2024 21:02

Dymaxion · 28/04/2024 20:59

Around 55% of social security expenditure goes to pensioners; in 2024 to 2025 we will spend £167.6 billion on benefits for pensioners in GB . This includes spending on the State Pension which is forecast to be £138.1 billion in 2024 to 2025.

This old chestnut @Polishedshoesalways Grin

I don’t find your posts remotely amusing.
6.1 million people on UC is a massive drain on our country.

Diggby · 28/04/2024 21:03

Polishedshoesalways · 28/04/2024 20:54

Yes that needs addressing. We are paying millions of healthy people to stay at home and rot all day.

That's not what I asked. Have you actually read the shortage occupations list?

I suspect I can answer for you - no, of course you haven't, otherwise your answer would make no sense. You're assuming that it is unskilled jobs that nobody wants to do. In fact it covers a huge range of industries - nuclear chemical scientists, biochemists, engineers of almost all flavours, vets, architects, choreographers, musicians, fishing industry, welders, carpenters, joiners, medical practitioners, psychologists, pharmacists, radiographers, social workers, maths and physics teachers - and that's not even an exhaustive list.

GoldenTrout · 28/04/2024 21:03

DolceGustoooohCoffee · 28/04/2024 14:57

How do you plan on housing these individuals whilst their claim is being processed? What about rights to work whilst their claim is being processed? What benefits will they receive whilst their claims are being processed? Will they pay taxes whilst awaiting their claim decision? If their claims are approved or denied, do you expect them to pay back any benefits/accomodation fees, advanced loans ..etc? How will you return them to their home country?

I don't understand why you are asking these questions. Do you think there are no systems in place currently to deal with most of those problems?

Housing and benefits stay the same as they are now. I think it would make absolute sense to allow asylum seekers to work - it is ludicrous that people with valuable skills are being prevented from working currently. In that event obviously they would also be paying tax etc if they earn enough.

If their asylum claim is not accepted they would be returned using the same means as are used now.

Sometimeswinning · 28/04/2024 21:06

Kinshipug · 28/04/2024 20:51

Sorry which question have I not answered?
You however have answered none.

Lets Try again 😂
What is your suggestion to an alternative to the Rwanda plan?

What is your question?

Polishedshoesalways · 28/04/2024 21:06

GoldenTrout · 28/04/2024 21:03

I don't understand why you are asking these questions. Do you think there are no systems in place currently to deal with most of those problems?

Housing and benefits stay the same as they are now. I think it would make absolute sense to allow asylum seekers to work - it is ludicrous that people with valuable skills are being prevented from working currently. In that event obviously they would also be paying tax etc if they earn enough.

If their asylum claim is not accepted they would be returned using the same means as are used now.

The issue is a legal one. If you allow AS to work and they are contributing however briefly to tax revenues etc then they can claim that it is an exploitative arrangement and argue to remain that way.

Do you seriously think no one has thought of utilising the asylum work force?! 🙄

SplitFountainPen · 28/04/2024 21:07

alloweraoway · 28/04/2024 14:03

If this is true, this is evil. People will be afraid to come for their legal meetings, What then?

Then they'll lose their right to stay. Could well be why this has been published

GoldenTrout · 28/04/2024 21:07

DolceGustoooohCoffee · 28/04/2024 15:05

Now compare that to a graph of terrorism attacks and attacks by asylum seekers in the last 24 months. Notice any similarities?

Show us that graph and we'll be able to judge for ourselves.

Rummikub · 28/04/2024 21:07

Beveren · 28/04/2024 20:48

My DC is already worried about the two asylum seekers in his class at school. They're about to sit GCSEs, it doesn't sound as if Sunak is about to put that sort of consideration ahead of his electoral ambitions.

Yes I’m worried about that too. They’ve worked hard and now they may be held in a detention centre for 10 weeks till the plane is full and ready to go. Just as an election winner? It’s sickening.

Rummikub · 28/04/2024 21:08

Polishedshoesalways · 28/04/2024 21:06

The issue is a legal one. If you allow AS to work and they are contributing however briefly to tax revenues etc then they can claim that it is an exploitative arrangement and argue to remain that way.

Do you seriously think no one has thought of utilising the asylum work force?! 🙄

Process them faster. Don’t keep them in the system for years.

SplitFountainPen · 28/04/2024 21:09

GoldenTrout · 28/04/2024 20:59

The fact that they know that, their asylum claim having already been processed once, they will not be allowed to stay?

With a different ID and the tactics used by lawyers supporting applications they'll be successful if they have enough money to put into it.

Polishedshoesalways · 28/04/2024 21:09

Diggby · 28/04/2024 21:03

That's not what I asked. Have you actually read the shortage occupations list?

I suspect I can answer for you - no, of course you haven't, otherwise your answer would make no sense. You're assuming that it is unskilled jobs that nobody wants to do. In fact it covers a huge range of industries - nuclear chemical scientists, biochemists, engineers of almost all flavours, vets, architects, choreographers, musicians, fishing industry, welders, carpenters, joiners, medical practitioners, psychologists, pharmacists, radiographers, social workers, maths and physics teachers - and that's not even an exhaustive list.

A healthy person on benefits should not have the choice to opt out of jobs they would rather not do! We have a huge range of unskilled work with a perfectly adequate workforce available.

I am all for encouraging skilled and talented students to stay but on five year visas etc.

GoldenTrout · 28/04/2024 21:10

Babyroobs · 28/04/2024 15:26

I had some sympathy until recent scenes where more immigrants jumped onto that already overcrowded boat last week and five people drowned including a seven year old girl. They also threw ? fireworks at the french police and have been attacking them. They are mostly young single men who seem to stop at nothing to get to the Uk. I don't really agree sending them to Rwanda is the right thing to do but there has to be some deterrent surely ?

Edited

Clearly this isn't deterring those people though, is it? A much better deterrent would be an efficient asylum processing scheme that means false asylum claims are weeded out quickly and the individual concerns can be deported back to their country of origin.

Polishedshoesalways · 28/04/2024 21:11

Rummikub · 28/04/2024 21:08

Process them faster. Don’t keep them in the system for years.

They are in the system for years because they launch appeal after appeal. What you are in fact saying is we need a much more robust immigration service, I agree with you.

Polishedshoesalways · 28/04/2024 21:12

GoldenTrout · 28/04/2024 21:10

Clearly this isn't deterring those people though, is it? A much better deterrent would be an efficient asylum processing scheme that means false asylum claims are weeded out quickly and the individual concerns can be deported back to their country of origin.

Ummm we have had that for years, and they just keep coming back. Or disappear of the face of the earth.

GoldenTrout · 28/04/2024 21:15

Growuppeople · 28/04/2024 16:07

We can’t afford to house them! Can’t even house people who where born here what is wrong with you lot

How will this remedy the housing situation, bearing in mind that for every asylum seeker Rwanda takes we take oe of theirs, generally people from the Congo to whom they are illegally refusing asylum?

Dymaxion · 28/04/2024 21:16

6.1 million people on UC is a massive drain on our country.

Nearly 40% of those are in work @Polishedshoesalways

GoldenTrout · 28/04/2024 21:17

BluntPoet · 28/04/2024 16:24

@flowertoday

Yes, migration has always existed. But so has the right of the host states to decide who gets to live within their borders.

The approval rate of asylum claims in the UK is higher than in most European countries.

Edited

That is possibly a reason for having a more effective asylum processing system. It is not a reason for spending millions shipping a few asylum seekers off to Rwanda.

Rummikub · 28/04/2024 21:17

Polishedshoesalways · 28/04/2024 21:11

They are in the system for years because they launch appeal after appeal. What you are in fact saying is we need a much more robust immigration service, I agree with you.

The people I see havent even got to the stage of appeal. They are just waiting.

quizzys · 28/04/2024 21:17

Those due for relocation to Rwanda are making their way in their droves to Ireland from NI right now.

There is discomfort (a nice way of putting it) brewing about this in Ireland now. Naturally Sunak et al are gleefully delighted that it will be someone else's problem again, and they may not have to deport as many to Rwanda as first thought if the exodus over the NI/Ireland border gains traction.

Polishedshoesalways · 28/04/2024 21:17

GoldenTrout · 28/04/2024 21:15

How will this remedy the housing situation, bearing in mind that for every asylum seeker Rwanda takes we take oe of theirs, generally people from the Congo to whom they are illegally refusing asylum?

Stop lying. We are not taking a 1.1 ratio, otherwise why would we be paying so much?! For goodness sake, you don’t need to lower yourself to openly lying.

Diggby · 28/04/2024 21:18

Polishedshoesalways · 28/04/2024 21:09

A healthy person on benefits should not have the choice to opt out of jobs they would rather not do! We have a huge range of unskilled work with a perfectly adequate workforce available.

I am all for encouraging skilled and talented students to stay but on five year visas etc.

How are you going to persuade this healthy person on benefits to work as a physics teacher or a nuclear chemist if they don't have any GCSEs?

Glad to hear you'd support 5 year student visas though - more generous than the existing system.

Polishedshoesalways · 28/04/2024 21:19

quizzys · 28/04/2024 21:17

Those due for relocation to Rwanda are making their way in their droves to Ireland from NI right now.

There is discomfort (a nice way of putting it) brewing about this in Ireland now. Naturally Sunak et al are gleefully delighted that it will be someone else's problem again, and they may not have to deport as many to Rwanda as first thought if the exodus over the NI/Ireland border gains traction.

That’s true. Perhaps Ireland might finally see how brexit actually happened. A moment of enlightenment so to speak.