Of course it’s a tragedy, and I doubt anyone would really believe it was anything other than that.
I think, though, that before we start wholesale condemnation we do need to remember that we don’t know why she died (article implied possibility of starvation or was it due to a sudden deterioration in a known/unknown health condition, for instance). As we don’t know, nor do we know what support she had/was getting, it’s hard to know if it was solely due to being impoverished and lack of access to services etc, or something less preventable.
The reason does not detract from the tragedy though.
It would seem wrong that if her right to remain was revoked that she was not adequately supported to feed and put a roof over their heads until such times as she could be returned to her country of origin (or complete any appeals process available to her).