I wonder how those parents would feel if their child needed an hdu bed and there wasn't one available, because we were keeping a child alive in a vegetative state with no chance of recovery? It's an awful thing to consider, but resources in the NHS aren't unlimited, and how many people would be able to afford that level of care privately? People are already denied treatments for things that could be helped because of costs, paying for unlimited care when doing so could actually be causing or prolonging suffering with no hope of recovery is unthinkable.
Also reversing the situation so that parents wishes are always followed, what happens when a parent denies essential life saving treatment, do the parents rights still count as more important than the childs needs? People really need to consider what is being proposed here with new legislation on parental rights.
If any good can come from this whole sad situation, then I hope it is that we consider the rights of the child to privacy, dignity and respect and to place quality of life above quantity.
Hopefully there will be sensible debate and discussion in the future, I have to say that in real life I haven't come across a single person who believes the hospital should have kept Alfie on life support.