Welcome to the thread but there's a lot to take in to make an accurate evaluation. Jingoism has been rife, imho, as I have had a few attacks when I suggested there might be more to this than our politicians would like us to believe/accept. Doubting these politicians is something I never thought I'd have to bring up on mumsnet as generally we do have a fair few cynics (a few, thankfully, also posted some questions here worth thinking about further).
Unfortunately, now that the tide is turning, and perhaps when the (still missing) evidence really has to come up for close scrutiny, comments did deteriorate with the last few posters, hence my own outburst against being labeled a troll for mentioning that things are far from right with Boris&May's narrative.
There's no doubt there were some good debates about how to work out what the poison was; but, they mostly mirrored the already decided and firm foregone conclusion of Boris&May that it was indeed Novichock and indeed made in Russia. That's it; decided!
I find it unbelievable that otherwise questioning people have now accepted the conclusion from our establishment without actually having seen any evidence (masks, clothing, cranes removing trucks etc are not 'evidence').
What was the point of all the discussions about the many 'kinds of data' that can be released that would provide the proof for the conclusion if then people roll over and accept what our politicians say without seeing any data?
After all, the Novichok inventor is in the USA, not Russia, right?.