I find this very receptive. westmidsmumof1 says "Islam says don't kill innocents". Someone says "no!" WMMO1 says "yes!" Someone says "liar".
All without references or argument. My tip for a better argument. Apply the Socratic method. What do words mean, exactly? If, once you boil all the excess garbage and misunderstandings out, you agree on the core then you agree.
WMMOO seems like a person who wants good things and is caught up in a battle of ideas and morality that she doesn't like. She is one of the good guys I mentioned up-thread who is trying to reconcile the golden rule with her religion and jettisoning or at least strongly downplaying the bits of her religion she doesn't like. Many others are doing the same, but in the opposite direction and murdering people.
And let's not kid ourselves that ISIS isn't Islam as that is a tale told to children to keep them cosy at night. Al-Bagdadhi (sp?) has a PhD from the most prestigious University of Islamic studies. And he doesn't know Islam? Yeah. And the Archbishop of Canterbury isn't a Christian. ISIS are very good at referencing Quran and Hadith to justify their actions. Saying "No, the're not Islamic" is the same argument style as between the posters I characterise above. It isn't an argument it is Monty Python's Argument sketch all over again, which for the uninitiated is purely about contradicting someone and not /arguing/.
WMMOO's core argument is "Mohammed out someone to death on the word of a woman therefore Islam is good". Hmm. I think we can see the issue there. If someone said "Hitler was a vegetarian and loved animals therefore he was good" we would rightly laugh at them.
So did Mohammed swap slaves? That's not very nice.
So did Mohammed have sex with small children? That's not very nice.
So did Mohammed require those who change their religion to be killed?
That's not very nice at all.
Not such a great chap in my opinion. Lots of people live better lives than that and we don't call them the perfect man and dedicate ourselves to copying their actions.
So Who exactly is defined as innocent in the Quran? (refs please as I gave my refs so my argument can be open and checked).
Which Hadith gives the example of a woman's testimony being equal or greater to that of a man as it would appear to contradict Quran 2:282 ("And if there are not two men (available), then a man and two women, such as you agree for witnesses, so that if one of them (two women) errs, the other can remind her." in case you don't have time to look it up) which has been used to set standards in Islamic jurisprudence? (I freely admit that this is a poor argument as some minor schools of thought say women shouldn't be allowed to testify at all. Four major schools of Islamic jurisprudence by the way - look 'em up - fascinating and appalling in their commonality of opinion about sex with a pre-pubescent girl though. Also by the way did you know that in most Islamic countries a woman's testimony is worth half that of a man. No where could they have got that idea from I wonder?)
Right. Boys have gone to school in an Uber and I need to get my last one ready do I can walk her to school before heading to my office. Enjoy your days everyone. Each sunny day is as a gift from the heavens, or if an atheist like me just something to revel in once more.