iPost (great name!), what would you do?
Forget any idea about educating people. Accept the reality that lots of people tend to hold on tight to their most important beliefs.
And realise even some of those that superficially appear to cope with something very oppositional to their own values, may be stewing under the surface. Eg... yes I could (eventually) get used to eating at a grubby food stall in a rat infested area under a flyover, next to a busy, polluted road ...and after a while be OK with that. Because it became my new new normal. Evidently my standards of food hygiene are quite flexible. But could I bollocks ever believe I am worth less, deserve less, am more expendable, more abusable, more disposable, less valuable than a male.
I could and did perform "I am submissive, feminine female" when social convention there dictated I did so or face unpleasant music. But the cost of that was I started to hate myself ....just that little bit more everyday. I struggled with the concept of living a lie. Because unlike my food hygiene standards, my feminism isn't/wasn't flexible.
It was that living of a lie that undid me. I couldn't contain my anger at myself. Because due to social/legal sanctions I betrayed my principles daily. And I turned a blind eye every single day to expectations and behaviours in action around me, which turned my stomach.
Despising yourself for betraying the principles you hold most dear and looking away from disgusting things rather than standing up for what you believe in is not an easy thing to live with. So I turned it outward and it mutated into avidly despising the entire country and damn near every national in it by the time I left. I lost all my shades of grey. Just as well there was no feminist group advocating violence over there. Not saying I would have stepped over the line into violence myself. (while not guaranteeing I wouldn't have) But.. I think on some level I would have been sympathetic and supported their principles and aims. Via my anger and resentment, with the added lubricant of my immaturity and youth at the time, I likely would have found it relatively easy to justify their means to the end in my own head.
That was my reality, (and I've known plenty of other women with not wholly dissimilar experiences), my solution, like so many others, was to leave the place that was slowly driving me mad cos it was a really poor fit with my world view. (Because I could. Thank you British passport for opening doors that otherwise would be slammed shut.)
In terms of finding a solution before there are horrible problems I think for a decent chunk of the world's population who also have strong views they hold dear, the secret to more successful, happier immigration would have to mean accepting they too may have the same human limitations that "people with firm feminist beliefs" like me have. So rather than going somewhere culturally distant that looks good on paper, they are likely to end up better adjusted if they move instead to a place that is different enough from home to be attractive (safer, more work, less draconian etc), but similar enough to avoid having to live your life as some kind of non stop daily cultural/ethical challenge. And if somebody does end up in a place that is slowly driving them mad, there has to be mechanisms in place to allow for a painless as possible transfer to somewhere less challenging that will let them in.
And that is what I see as the least painful solution all round. What we didn't do when we had the chance. Europe recognising the common good and its own gain in providing plentiful and long term resources to ensure no nation near a war zone, whose population is fleeing from all borders, suffers disproportionately from a sudden influx. And being willing to keep that support up for as long as it is needed, at a level that avoids deprivation causing dissent and flight. Plus accepting that anybody they have accommodated in their own "culturally distant" country, who is displaying a strong tendency toward finding life challenging in terms of oppositional beliefs ....is in need of a change of environment, for everybody's sake.
Unfortunately I have no idea how that could be put into practice now, not without the rapid invention of a time machine.
For now, I think....
More police on the streets... as in hire more, not just move them in from other parts of the country. Use the army for now. Just ... change their uniforms if possible otherwise people will get even more frightened. Women cannot be put into a position where through fear they start changing their habits. So boots on street to inspire confidence that protection is to hand and keep women living their lives as normally as possible.
Specialised task forces to focus on street level sex crime at events/hot spots with realistic levels of manpower. Co-ordinated and focused on knowledge sharing at a European/international level. The plan being to cut this off at the knees before it spreads even further, like a particularly nasty dose of "rapist measles".
Rigorous determination to avoid temporary or semi permanent "impervious culture bubbles" springing up in areas. Pop 'em as soon as you spot them. Ditto congregations of homegrown extremists.
More courtrooms
More judges
More prisons
More health/mental health resources for the people at the sharp end of imported sexual assault/abuse tactics. Connect with equivilent entities overseas to gain knowledge as per what specific considerstions need to be brought to the table to help victims of this specific crime heal physically, emotionally and mentally. We need to check if a Eurocentric sex crime tool bag fits the bill. As little working in the dark with assumptions rather than knowledge should be the aim.
Strengthened and widened legislation with regards to sexual assault/rape that gets used, not just written down and left to get dusty with the epitaph "well at least we gave you wordy lip service ! !"
More punitive sentencing of sex crimes regardless of who is doing it.
The abandonment of any legislation that makes it onerously difficult to expel a non-national with unwanted behaviours, regardless of what they do. I would include non-nationals with EU citizenship in that. Just because the law may say we can't at the moment, doesn't mean it has to stay that way. If you can't behave in the EU you shouldn't get to float around unfettered in the EU being a scrote.
Restore faith in the media and power structures by giving them a reason to abandon the practice of burying/minimising news of this nature. People pressure via comments, cancelling of subscriptions, writing to MPs etc ... with a clear message as per why. Shitloads of negative comment on SM. God knows why but that is the only thing so many entities seem to care about these days, how well/badly they are doing on Twitter.
Other governments in Europe to offer whatever help Germany needs to manage what has the potential to become a European crisis. Of proportions I would prefer not to contemplate.
Moderates on the left, right and centre, to engage with each other respectfully, using brain rather than pure emotion and setting aside point scoring knee jerks about other issues for the time being. All while steadfastly ignoring distraction techniques from the halo polisher crowd and anti-all-immigration-ever mob at the far ends of the spectrum. Whose joint agenda is to control the discourse to the point where it becomes limited to just their two extreme perspectives. They need each other to feed/be fed by each other, or they can't survive. Choke them off as far as we are able with an absence of acknowledgement, let alone diving down rabbit holes after them.
NB - A time machine might actually be cheaper and more achievable than all the above.