It would depend it if it was really the people doing it or a Neo-Nazi coup and what effect that coup would then have on Europe and a possible war.
It wasn't a neo-nazi coup. Far right & far left elements were involved, but the majority of those involved in overthrowing Yanukovich were ordinary people. I think ordinary people are allowed the right to protest without thinking of the geopolitical consequences of their actions. I think Greece had a right to have a vote on the bailout, even if I think it was an idiotic move.
There was an election in less than a year. I think they should have put it to the people because lots of the Russian speakers in Donetsk and Lugansk and Crimea did not have a chance to vote on the coup
The Ukrainian government tried to bring ballot boxes to the east, but the Russian separatists stopped them and made it hard to hold the election.
If there was a coup in Mexico on the US border and a pro-Putin regime was installed, the US would be right to be displeased. Doing things like that are very dangerous to world peace and stability
Really??? What would have been your reaction if Germany invaded Greece to stop a pro Russian party taking power?!
One of the reasons lefties like me have a more disillusioned view of the USA is because we don't think countries have a right to overturn popular political movements that threaten their interests, as the USA had so much fun doing in the 50s, 60s and 70s.
I thought you were all for people power?
I didn't know it, I only saw those headlines and thought wow, Osborne has helped the working poor, well done. It is only after I heard all the analysis that I realised he took more than he gave.
Please don't insult our intelligence claig, for someone who is as politically aware as yourself to not know that the tories were proposing £12 billion of cuts, primarily from welfare, is just unbelievable.
That would mean war. That would be horrendous for millions of people in Europe. That is why Merkel panicked and stayed it off.
I'm not so sure about that. What's Russia's interest in a war in Europe? Their oligarchs are fat and happy. They want to go on holiday in Paris and buy property in London.
He's got what he wants already - a permanently destabilised Ukraine. I note that there are no popular uprisings in Kharkov to bring Russian separatists in. I also remember the huge popular pro-Ukrainian revolution protesters in the delightful lenin square in Donetsk. I think Putin truly believed his own propaganda and thought the Russian speakers of Eastern Ukraine would welcome them with open arms. He's been sadly disillusioned. He has no desire for uncomfortable scenes of Russians killing fellow Russian speaking Christian Orthodox peoples. He's had enough trouble already with troops coming home in coffins.
We have had threads on this and I have said what Russia motivations to take Crimea and protect Donetsk are. There is no secret about it.
So you believe in people power, but not when it threatens Russian interests. Which other countries are allowed to invade their neighbours? Should Italy be able to invade Greece if they elect a pro-Russian government?
I don't know who they are as I don't live in Russia or speak Russian. I know of Putin and Medvedev and former economic adviser Glazyev, but that is it. But their strategy is to try and be friendly with Germany and France and prevent them joining a war against Russia, as far as I can see.
You don't speak Greek or German either, but you're perfectly capable of talking about their elites.
I am sure that every country has elites, some elites are more powerful than others and some elites are subservient to others, and that politicians and PPEs are not the elites.
You must have an idea who the elites are, surely?