The excellent John Harris of the Guardian once again. Harris is good, he understands the people even if he disagrees with them
"Clacton byelection: the main parties need to hear this roar of defiance
From Clacton to Strood, only Ukip seems to speak to voters who feel abandoned, patronised and ignored
...
A fortnight or so ago, as part of the campaign for this week’s Clacton byelection, Douglas Carswell and Nigel Farage addressed a public meeting. The hall where it was held is only a stone’s throw from Jaywick, the jumble of former holiday chalets and potholed streets that is reckoned to be the poorest council ward in England: on the face of it, a symbol of the kind of deep social problems that tend to be synonymous with political apathy. That night, though, about 900 people turned up.
It’s said that Farage considers it the most extraordinary meeting he’s ever experienced.
...
When politics is successful, it makes the most of this: as one of my left-wing friends is fond of pointing out, Margaret Thatcher never used a fact in her life. So it is with Ukip, and what is about to happen on the Essex coast: a great visceral roar of dissent and defiance, channelled through a party whose leader instinctively understands politics’ more emotional aspects while the people at the top of supposedly mainstream parties have no clue.
In essence, Ukip has a simple human story to tell. People feel abandoned; this new force assures them it will listen. They complain of being insulted and patronised; Ukip insists they should never apologise for who they are. Whereas modern politics is fronted by androids who talk in borderline riddles – “One nation”, “the big society” – Ukip’s thinking is presented in appetisingly straightforward terms. In other words, despite huffing and puffing about the details of Ukip policy (witness the absurd spectacle of Labour forensically tackling its views on the NHS), all that is for the birds. As far as Farage’s supporters are concerned, it’s less what he says than the way he says it.
...
In Clacton, Ukip will obviously triumph. In Heywood and Middleton, which also votes on Thursday, they claim they are going to run Labour a lot closer than people think. With more echoes of Scotland, in both places, people on the ground say that local debate is crackling with energy. As one Ukip high-up puts it: “If it matters, people vote.” As and when the writ is moved for the Rochester and Strood byelection, and the former Tory Mark Reckless prepares to meet his fate, the Tories will throw everything they’ve got at him, but a recent poll put Ukip nine points ahead. A big local factor, it seems, is lingering resentment about the demise of the Chatham dockyard, which shut 30 years ago – another example of the kind of deeply emotional politics that even Labour politicians now have difficulty understanding.
There, as elsewhere, a lot of people minded to vote for Ukip will doubtless explain their feelings in terms of a tangle of inconsistencies streaked through with undeniable truths – something illustrated by a conversation I recently had in Jaywick with a retired railwayman, lifelong trade unionist and Labour voter, who had come to the coast from his native London. “Look at us,” he said. “We’re a backwater, aren’t we? That nobody gives a shit about.”
Despite his harsh words about what Thatcher had done to the country, he said he was going to vote Ukip on Thursday. But did he really think Farage and Carswell were any different? Not for the first time, emotion trumped political logic. “I’m hoping so,” he said. “I’m hoping so.”
www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/oct/08/clacton-byelection-parties-defiance-coast-strood-ukip
Brilliant analysis. He doesn't get everything right in my opinion, but he shines a light that others fail to see.
Carswell wil never lead UKIP because Carswell does not really represent our views. He hasn't reall got he common touch. Louise Bours could run rings around him in understanding. People will vote Carswell because he is UKIP, they won't care about his books or his views.