Child taken by from womb by forced C/S for social services! II

[saragossa2010]

As the other is full.
There are far too many cases where the authorities rush to remove children and do not give both parents and wider family a say. Adoption is rushed through.
The fact a senior family judge is insisting he is involved in the rest of this case is a good thing and the more cases like this which receive publicity the better.

The point is it is like justice in China and Russia. If it's secret then those involved cannot justify themselves. If we have more in the public domain that is a greater good than any risk from disclosure to the children and parents involved. it is why open justice and published judgments and rights for all those involved in child disputes to use twitter, blogs and emails and no stifling of free speech.

Thankfully things are all moving this way and we lucky to have people like JM and C Booker to give publicity to the issues which need much wider debate. I would imagine most social workers and lawyers involved in this area are very happy that the issues get more public debate not less. Most professions would.

Or, according to my information, which must remain confidential, I allege that John Hemming's reputation in Westminster, within his constituency, and on MN is in tatters?

I have some documentation to prove it. but I can't show you it.

Right.

John Hemmings is not supported by the LibDem whip in these matters.

John Hemmings is not supported within his constiuency of these matters.

John Hemmings is not supported on Mumsnets on these matters.

Anything I have missed, John?

Hahahahahahah procrastinating rather than brushing my teeth, I was having a little trip down memory lane courtesy of exexpats link to the pink tape blog.

And who do I find in a May 2011 thread wondering what is all this fuss about JH, he seems such a sweet man but Claig!

Not that I ever doubted with some people I was on a losing wicket but this is a rather fine example of it.

Some of the deletions seem very random I agree.

I know for a fact that JH and IJ are enormous lizards.

I have the documents RIGHT HERE.

But I am of course far too busy and important and about to brush my teeth, so can't share the proof with you. But they both have magnificent scaley tales and cold unblinking eyes.

Tails dammit.

So Maryz if I post....
Ian Josephs

Is an

Atrocious cunt

I might get away with it?

I'm sorry Spero. But until I have the accredited testimony of your teeth in this matter I will continue to assert you have a)abused them, with random attacks on them with foaming ( and potentially poisonous matter 2) also abused them, with yet more random attacks via thin threads of unknown substances, which might well contain poisonious matter, and 3) abusing them with unwarrented douches of possibly poisonous matter while swishing in a particularly aggressive way.

I shall immediately sue you for defamation.

I've not said much on these threads because I can barely trust myself to speak. But just want to applaud Spero and Nana and Lilka and Maryz and everyone else who has done sterling work here.

JH's post of 12.34 was a low. How dare he preach to us that 'adoption is not a panacea' after all the times he has come on to the adoption threads to insult and goad us? If he ever listened to us, rather than lecturing and threatening, he might actually learn something about adopted children's lives.

And Juliet? Adoption is not a good thing for a child to go through - all of us adoptive parents would agree with that - but it's considerably better than what they went through prior to being adopted, or what they would have gone through if they hadn't been adopted.

Is Khan an atrocious cunt?