Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

News

Time magazine image of breastfeeding

410 replies

banana87 · 11/05/2012 10:51

Apparently this image is kicking up a hot debate in the US.

www.mirror.co.uk/news/world-news/time-magazine-cover-showing-mother-828267

I really wish people would educate themselves about the benefits of extended breastfeeding before proclaiming its child molestation. Utterly crap.

OP posts:
5madthings · 16/05/2012 18:08

exotic it started on p11 or 12 when a poster said something about children being sexually aware from 3yrs of age or something? i shall read back but it was kind of a logical progression of something brought up but obviously not relevant to the thread title! Grin

5madthings · 16/05/2012 18:10

"I see nothing wrong with breastfeeding a three year old. If she wants to, why not?!

OTH, I would never even consider it.
I've seen my nephews at age 3-5 looking at Victoria's Secret catalogues and perking into ladies' trial rooms. They became sexually aware and curious to some extent by that age.
I wouldn't feel comfortable putting a child of that age, with that level of awareness and curiosity, to my breast."

here i responded to this comment on p12, as did other people and the debate ensured from there!

jjkm · 16/05/2012 18:20

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

5madthings · 16/05/2012 18:30

it is good isnt it jjkm apart from being called 'sick' of course!

there was another comment about how children over 2yrs of age shouldnt see their mothers naked breasts? or something along those lines and that is how we got onto the debate about nudity.

i meant to say when i bfed ds2 and ds3 who fed until 3 and a half and almost 4 yrs of age, should i have blindfolded them?! Grin Wink

exoticfruits · 16/05/2012 18:38

Thanks- I do remember now.

5madthings · 16/05/2012 18:41

its def taken an odd turn but there was a sort of logic to it.....

mathanxiety · 16/05/2012 19:29

'... it started on p11 or 12 when a poster said something about children being sexually aware from 3yrs of age or something? i shall read back but it was kind of a logical progression of something brought up but obviously not relevant to the thread title'

I think it's directly related to the brouhaha about the Time photo and article -- since there are many who think of breastfeeding as having sexual connotations.

(And I think it was WhatTheHeck who feels children are sexually aware around age three)

5madthings · 16/05/2012 20:03

yes it in relevant in that context math you are right it just seemed to have veered more toward nudity and less about bfeeding but its kind of interlinked as yes many people see bfeeding as having sexual connotations, which i cant quite grasp tbh, my breasts have fed my babies they can also be involved in my sex life, but that doesnt meant he two cross over, they can perform two seperate functions, my dp can find them attractive, he was also perfectly capable of seperating that from the fact that they fed our babies and to my children they are actually primarily a method of feeding babies, it hasnt occured to my 4, 7 and 9 yr olds that breasts should be sexually attractive, my ds1 is at an age where he knows that boobs are seen as 'sexy' and yet he is able to realise they are just a part of his mothers body, that fed him as a baby and dont actually hold any particular interest to him and as they dont interest him, he isnt phased by seeing them in the flesh if he comes in the bathroom when i am having a shower or a bath.

5madthings · 16/05/2012 20:05

sorry REALLY crappy punctuation in that post ^^ i need to stop trying to do ten things at once... this is what happens when you try to tidy up from dinner, put 3 boys to bed, entertain the baby, hoover up, sweep the floor and sort laundry, make pack ups and wash up AND intermittenly mnet at the same time!

leaving68 · 18/05/2012 14:07

It's utter rubbish that children are sexual from the age of 3 onwards, if by sexual we mean that they actually realise what the ?sex? act means or what it actually entails.

Yes, toddlers realise that their genitals give them good sensations. Feeding at their mother?s breast give them great sensations without it being sexual. Talking about sexualisation and BF simultaneously tells me nothing other than most humans are still ignorant of their own bodies and lack real understanding of BF whether in terms of biology or human social behaviour.

My DS was breastfed until he self-weaned at age 3.5 years old. Yes, he is just ONE child out of many millions, but my extensive research into BF tells me that Bf children are in fact LESS sexual. My son is now nearly 8 and still sees me topless quiet often. He doesn?t even look at my breasts, they mean absolutely nothing to him other than they were used to feed him!

Only a few months ago I noticed 2 boys in his class ( 7 o 8) sniggering at the poster of a woman exposing a bit cleavage. My son's instant response was "Mum. why are they laughing at that picture?" i.e. at nearly age 8, my son still does NOT find women's breasts as objects to be sniggered at nor has he yet latched on (excuse the pun !!) to the idea that breasts are for anything other than feeding animal or human babies/children.

Of course the influence of parents comes into it as well, both of the sniggering boys mentioned above have fathers who are from male-chauvinist, football mad, boob-mad backgrounds. My son dose not have the same sort of male influences, DH not being chauvinistic and other male members of the family (chauvinist or not) not being allowed to influence him.

A man once asked me the idiotic question ?are you still breastfeeding because it turns you on sexually" ? An elderly lady (childless) told me that I was setting my son up for ?a life-time boob obsession? with all my BF. Leaving the stupidity and sheer rudeness of these comments to one side, these sorts of questions expose the extent to which both men and women (parents or not) are utterly ill-informed and ignorant about BF.

It is no wonder whatsoever that the children of such people also grow up to see extended BF (I hate the word ?extended - it isn?t extended at all as the average age of self-weaning globally is 4 years old ? my son and I are totally NORMAL ) as both sexual and repulsive.

Research shows that primates BF their babies to the human equivalent of 7 years old. If humans did not have socialisation, ill-informed gossip and ridiculous amounts of sexualisation to worry about (promoted by the media more than anything else) we would all probably do what our biology dictates: - BREAST feed our children well beyond the baby years because it?s physically and emotionally the best thing to do for both mother and child.
Primates and other ?higher? order animals don?t have to worry about who thinks what of exposed boobs. They feed their babies/toddlers because if they don?t they will die of various diseases. It?s to do with the survival instinct and nothing else. They also don't worry about ATTACHMENT parenting nor read books on the topic, they just DO IT otherwise their babies die.

My son has been educated to understand that the best food for a baby is breast milk. It is only by educating our sons and daughters that we can finally stop worrying about BF and ignore all the crap written about it in the media.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page