Googlenut - the changes to DLA are that it will be REPLACED by PIP. The Gevernment haven't announced made their decision on whether it will be included in Universal Credit, or under the UC cap - though they won't be including it right at the start - it makes provision under the Welfare Reform Bill for it to be included in UC, and therefore in the UC cap, at a later point.
They need to whip the masses into just a little bit more of a frenzy before they include it under the UC cap, in other words.
Testing the waters by making the disabled do indefinate length Workfare placements when the able-bodied don't have to do more than 8 weeks - 6 months MAXIMUM workfare placements is the start of this. If the public don't kick up too much of a fuss over THAT, then PIP (the replacement for DLA), WILL be included under the UC cap at some point in the near future.
And as for only one person in a family being disabled, or at least, only one person in a family/household being allowed to claim disability benefits, I would like everyone to tell me who I should 'choose' to be allowed to claim?
Me, with uncontrolled epilepsy? My DD who has NUMEROUS disabilities, including Autism, learning difficulties, partial deafness and more? My DS2 who has SEVERE, disabling asthma, EDS type II and Autism?
What I am worried about is that if they reach adulthood and are still unable to live independantly, if one of THEM claimed, say, ESA or DLA, would that mean that there would be some sort of a conference or something, where the DWP had to DECIDE which one out of the three of us was 'allowed' to claim the disability benefits? How would that WORK? If we ALL met the criteria (which we no longer do, since this Government changed what classes as disabled, but for argument's sake...), how would they decide WHICH of us was 'more deserving'? How would they decide which ONE of us got protected from Workfare?
And does this mean that if someone has 2/3 people in their households with disabilities severe enough to be getting disability benefits (DLA or PIP), that if they lived ALONE they would ALL be able to get disability benefits, yet when living TOGETHER only ONE can? Surely that makes a mockery of David Cameron's 'Big Society'?!