Dear all
I have not followed this thread, thoroughly. I do find myself agreeing with David Starkey. I do not believe he was racist, but he did point out some unpleasant and inconvenient truths. There was a wide spread of ethnicities involved in the riots and you cannot focus it on any one ethnic group. What does characterise these groups is wanting repect without reciprocating it - probably not even knowing what respect means!
Too many youth do speak with a Jamaican patois, but what of it as long as those talking can construct well-meaning and cogent opinions. The youths involved in the rioting seemed unable to do this. They did not have a point to make; they were all opportunistic thugs and thieves. No different than MPs (and expenses) and Bankers (and everything they have messed up).
I do not believe David Starkey was talking about emulating Jamaican patois, rather he was talking abouty the emulation of the street and gangter aspects of it that seem cool to the young.
It is very difficult to be blunt without provoking the "liberals and chattering classes". These would only be liberal until it affected themselves or members of thier families, directly.
We have spared the rod and spoiled the child for too long. I hope David Starkey's opinions up a wider debate - but I fear it will not happen.
No doubt I will be left reeling by an onslaught of criticism from the sociologists, social worked, guardianistas, other apologists et al, so let's start finding excuses to absolve those amoral rioters (miscreants) from their ghastly and ill-gotten deeds.