Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

News

This woman should parp herself!

310 replies

monkeytrousers · 27/11/2005 14:33

parp!parp!parp!FGS!!

OP posts:
handlemecarefully · 28/11/2005 00:17

Mind you, I wouldn't mind going to her toddler group. Sounds a damn sight more interesting than mine...

skerriesmum · 28/11/2005 01:07

The really sad thing is that Michael Chabon IS an amazing author, I love his books! I can't believe he's married and has kids with such an idiot! And she says she's better at writing while he's the better editor??!!! Puh-leeze!
I think (excuse the cliche but it's true) no matter how much you love your dh you don't know what true unconditional love is until you have a child...

hunkermunker · 28/11/2005 01:12

Read a small part of the article to DH. He said, "He's shagging someone else" Perceptive chap, my DH (even if he doesn't have insteps to slobber for).

This woman is 100% freak. Love your husband by all means, but do try to show some kind of respect for the children you've had. This is not the way to go about it. Perhaps she needed to write the article/book because the future therapy bills for four f*cked-up kids will be sky-high.

Cabe · 28/11/2005 01:47

totally agree Skerriesmum... and what she's missing out on NOT falling in love with her children. It's the most wonderful feeling

My dp's too good looking by far but in my heart of hearts I know he's a bit of a Shit!! I can't think that about my babies - not even though dd is 14 now and can do a fabulous strop!!!

Tortington · 28/11/2005 03:06

the centre of my universe

the centre of my universe is me. when i want a good sh*g i get one. my dh is forever doing things for me - running upstairs for something i forgot, he opens car doors and brews up constantly. thats not why i love him ofcourse i can't wuite put my finger on that one. but i would sacrifice him ( or me) in a second for the kids. my family on the whole work around me. sometimes out of necessity - i do a lot of evening meetings. dh does 70% of anything child related or domestic. this is becuase i am terminally lazy.

i didnt much like my kids when they were little. but i love them to bits now. i do go out of my way for them - dont get me wrong, but not often. but i fight for them becuase i wont see them wronged.

its rough having me as a mum. no one can speak to me in the morning its forbidden before at least 3 cups of coffee.

similarly i cannot deal with the stream of enquiries " i need 1.50 for a new art book"
"i need £1 for mufty day"
"me too"
"i need £.50p for a new book cover"
"i need to do a collage"
"me too"
"i need cooking ingrediants"

... when i get home from work til at least another two cups of coffee.

my kids dont come first on a day to day basis. i do. all their needs are met. love is abound and their lives are more important than mine ofcourse. you will find me in tesco at 10.30pm looking for yeast for bread making in cooking tomorrow. but not often

but i do long for the day when they leave home and i can spend even more time with me.i won't do babysitting for grandchildren and will never knit a bootee. i shall be off on holiday whilst they are complaining on mumsnet about how their mum doesn't take an interest in their children.

i think in essence this lady is a fuck wit but there are a couple of odours from this article that ring true.

that children dont always come first and even though sometimes they do is not compulsory they should.

that husbands are nice when you have a good one and a good sh*g is pretty key ( to me) and its nice to be able to share a worry so two people can worry.

and finally i think she was rebelling against professional motherhood. there are so many mums who forget themselves in favour of this professional persuit. aiming for perfection. which is ( it seems to me) so prevelent an ideal in america - the 2.4 kids, happy photos , baking biscuits and high level of school involvement. this ideal i have noticed is permeating our society too. and lets face it, its unobtainable bollocks.

Twiglett · 28/11/2005 05:50

OMG ROFLMAO at Sobernow passage .. if you can put comments on the article online .. please sobernow .. you must post it .. you must you must you must

also snurking gaily at aloha's "Sometimes I look at my husband, tousled head bent over the new orthotics that arrived yesterday for his flat feet, and think, 'hmmm, have we got enough bread for tomorrow'."

bobbybob · 28/11/2005 06:03

How proud her four children must be that she "loves them, but is not in love with them". Presuming of course that they can read.

foundintranslation · 28/11/2005 06:36

just read it again. omg is she smug.
i find the last paragraph, particularly the last sentence, positively disturbing. poor kids.

pixel · 28/11/2005 08:22

I didn't make it as far as the last paragraph. Will have to go back and look now, doh!

pixel · 28/11/2005 08:25

Oh dear, "What they saw when they looked at me".

How can her poor children possibly hope to beat that? They will feel like failures for the rest of their lives

satine · 28/11/2005 09:07

Hmm. Strikes me as a certain case of a rather plain woman trying desparately to cling onto a man she thinks is rather out of her league. And this will do nothing to help his fat head (which matches his fat arse).

merryberry · 28/11/2005 09:36

rofl

Please lady put down the word processor and go and defluff his navel and leave us in peace.

AnnieSG · 28/11/2005 10:00

Nightynight, thank you so much for the explanation of parping.

Have giggled like a mad thing at some of these posts, especially about the strange instep-obsession. I think she has done her husband a huge disservice here - he's an author I love and now I will find myself thinking about his funny feet whenever I see a new novel.

monkeytrousers · 28/11/2005 11:34

Annie, I'm never sure I'm using the parp in it's correct context anyway!

OP posts:
spidermama · 28/11/2005 11:42

What an irritating woman.
I had to skip most of it too. Far too much information. And barf at her stopping off to buy lubricant. Is this meant to imply she's happy to take it, erm, in reverse as it were? I don't feel I needed to know that.

dinosaur · 28/11/2005 11:42

sobernow and aloha

spidermama · 28/11/2005 11:44

PMSL at hunker's dh's comments, 'He's shagging someone else'. Spot on.

Nightynight · 28/11/2005 12:48

yes, I thought so too spidermama!

I feel that the editor who let this badly written, badly thought out piece of rubbish appear has not been blamed enough though.

jenk1 · 28/11/2005 13:19

why does she need lubricant?

jenk1 · 28/11/2005 13:28

Ugh, just read spidermamas post and realised!!!!

melsy · 28/11/2005 13:41

I couldnt read it all , but she gives me the heeby jeeby creeps. How very ODDDDDDD.

loving yuor post custy "i think in essence this lady is a fuck wit but there are a couple of odours from this article that ring true" !!!!!!!!! .

JingEllBells · 28/11/2005 14:43

PMSL Spidermama

That's worse than the thought of my dh's insteps.

Nightynight, maybe it's the editor he's shagging and it's all a ghastly joke between them....

lucycinco · 28/11/2005 15:01

I skipped loads too, what a horrible, needy woman! Her poor kids!

aloha · 28/11/2005 15:06

Of course she needs lubricant! He is Not As Other Men....

IntergalacticTheRedNosedWalrus · 28/11/2005 15:12

PMSL at this thread.

What a twat that woman is.