If there's no diagnosis - whatever the young person had a school - most universities cannot make concessions or offer mitigation. We need evidence, and evidence in good time.
Evidence has been provided of the provision that was in place throughout school but this has not been accepted.
It really cannot be done on an ad hoc basis well, certainly not at my university). And we would require some form of official documentation, not just "DC had it at school."
That's nothing like what has been written to the university. We've given evidence and they have said it's insufficient but in the particular circumstances it is hard to know what else to provide. This is becoming a very worrying situation and I wonder if all the parents here with their oh-so-clever remarks about demanding this and that and attending job interviews with my dc would be so sanguine if their dc was facing something that could prevent them from completing their degree and the university was stonewalling them.
Would you get your own Mum to ring on your behalf to sort something out * ?
Your DD is an adult now. If she is not prepared to chase this herself then the time for you to work on this type of thing was when she was a child. You are infantilising her. Clearly that has held her back already so don’t keep doing it.*
@Bluebluesummer Did I ever say I was going to ring? Is there any difference between 49 and 18, or is it just ADULT, that's it, you're on your own. Have I said 'she' (have been gender neutral throughout but several have assumed girl and none boy - I wonder why?) isn't prepared to chase it? No, I've made it clear that's not the case but don't let that stop you spinning a narrative. And what on earth are you basing the wild assumption that 'she' has been held back on??? Nasty, irrelevant post.
It's not going to be solved my rocking up and insisting on a meeting. Who's 'rocking up' anywhere? Why do so many on this thread have to exaggerate and twist what people are saying. And some work in academia?!