Sorry dont want to derail,
But if there are posters reading this, who like us used bog standard state comps, and unlike the likes VanCleefArpels and justasking111 and aren't therefore saving the odd £7500/term, please don't be put off using student finance. For both tutition and maintenance loans.
If your Dc is studying outside London and living away from home ( students in London get a high rate and students living at home a lower rate of maintenance loans) your child can claim either £6000 or £9250 for tutition and between £4168 and £8944 for maintenance loans.
These are loans not debts, yes they acrue interest, but ignore all that, please. Your child only ever starts paying back once they earn £25000. So if they start on £22000 they owe nothing.
Once you earn over £25000 you pay 9% of the difference between your salary and the £25000. So if earning £25500 your Dc will pay £45 back to SFE, at 50000 they will pay £2250.
Doesn't matter if the loan is for £45000 or £1000000 they will only pay back 9% of their earnings over £25000 it is really only a form of graduate tax. Then over for a maximum of 30 years.
Please listen to the likes of Martin Lewis and his excellence student finance specials, the government ministers and SFE, and not to the of the private school users.
Surely it would be better saying the £18464, 9250 + 8944, thats £55392 over a 3 year course and giving your Dc that as a desposit on a home, then saving them £2250 on £50000 salary, after all its only £188/month.
Sorry, but statements made about student debt and rich parents not wanting it should be kept of general uni threads, for poor and disadvantaged families it is a major off puter and myths spout by the likes of Vancleef and justasking111 are wrong, unfounded and should be called out.
I don't want kids like mine thinking it wrong to use student finance, there is enough hurdles for them to jump to get to university, without untrue ones been added.