Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Guest posts

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

Guest post: Nicky Morgan - "Why academisation is best for our schools"

999 replies

MumsnetGuestPosts · 18/03/2016 17:09

As parents, we all want the best for our children. We want to make sure they have access to the best opportunities and to help them grow up into well-rounded adults. Making sure that our children have a high quality education is a key part of that.

I want to outline exactly what academisation means and why I truly believe this is the best way forward for our schools. Our children only have one shot at receiving the best education and I am committed to ensuring this happens as swiftly as possible.

We need to put our trust into the hands of the people that know best how to run our schools - the teachers - and the academy system does just that. tells you more about what an academy is. It gives schools greater autonomy to make the decisions that are right for their community and pupils. After all, we have the finest generation of teachers ever and being part of an academy helps put the power back in their hands.

The most recent results show that the percentage of pupils achieving the expected level in reading, writing and maths at the end of Key Stage 2 in primary academies has risen by 4%, from 67% in 2014 to 71% in 2015. Additionally, when it comes to secondary, it's a similar story with converter academies which are performing 7.2% above the national average, with 64.3% of pupils achieving five good GCSEs.

However, a dynamic school system where all schools are academies is just one part of a much wider plan to improve our education system which I set out yesterday in our white paper.

It is every parent's right to know their child is in an excellent school no matter where in the country they live. I am confident that this move will guarantee a higher school standard with each academy held to account for the performance of their pupils.

Ultimately, I am committed to making it easier for you as a parent to play an even more active role in your child's education. In essence, I want to put young people and parents first – something that might sound obvious, but the truth is that for too long parents have been an afterthought in our education system. We want you as parents to have a much stronger voice in what happens to your child during their school years, because we know that you want the very best for your child.

So how are we doing that? Firstly, I am well aware that the education system can appear complex to many parents. I am dedicated to changing this once and for all, and putting the control firmly back in your hands. As a result of this, I plan to introduce a new, online Parents Portal from as early as next year. This portal will enable parents' access to key information and allow you to support your child's learning.

Alongside this, we have changed the curriculum and the way that students will be assessed. This will help to raise standards and make sure that your child leaves school with the knowledge and skills they need to succeed. It is imperative that every child fulfils their potential, and this includes stretching the most able pupils.

More young people will also study the EBacc - a combination of maths, English, two sciences, a humanity and a language - up to the age of 16. And the exams and qualifications young people are awarded will set a new international gold standard that is respected by employers, helping them to succeed in our increasingly global world.

I am a firm believer that an exceptional education transforms children's futures and everything outlined in this White Paper is committed to ensuring that parents and pupils come first. Our goal must always be to ensure every single child leaves school with the best education and the opportunity to excel in adult life. I believe that together, we can achieve that goal.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
5
rollonthesummer · 22/03/2016 13:29

I doubt Nicky Morgan has even read this thread.

Peregrina · 22/03/2016 13:31

Does anyone know what the position of the church schools will be? Many village schools are still run by the C of E, simply because in the 19th Century they were the only people to bother to provide education for the masses. Would they be able to put a spanner in the works? Or is this another area where the white paper was long on waffle and short on detail? (Sorry for the grammar offence, starting the sentence with Or.)

rollonthesummer · 22/03/2016 13:32

Just got this email through from the NUT. At least they are trying.

Guest post: Nicky Morgan - "Why academisation is best for our schools"
mercifulTehlu · 22/03/2016 13:39

Peregrina - apparently there is at least one CofE academy chain which runs a whole load of church primaries but I have heard it's not very well run.

Valentine2 · 22/03/2016 13:39

Peregrina
That was a joke but honestly I don't think she does not realise what she has done. I think she is fully aware of what she wrote and why. I am also sure there is shitload of money to be made in it for her and her cronies so she would much rather prefer to ride the storm one way or the other. Just last night she managed to moan about the fact that the Newnight fellas had not been nice to her and had not shown her the data they were planning to question her about before she went on "live". So that gives me an indication that she is hardly going to agree to appear here on live web chat. That would effectively be end of her career if Mumsnet actually manager to get her to do it and publicise it in general press properly beforehand.

In my opinion, people like her must be brought to court to try and do stupidly dangerous self serving mutations to public assets. This is what she is up to: destruction of public assets.

rollonthesummer · 22/03/2016 13:43

If she did come on for a live chat- it would probably be like one last year just before the election (forget who she was now) who insisted on typing her replies herself. It took her about 25 minutes of the chat to type 'hello mumsnet'. By the time she'd answered three or for (planted) easy questions, it was sadly time for her to be elsewhere so she could answer no more!

Total waste of time.

TwoLeftSocks · 22/03/2016 13:43

Is the Shadow Education Secretary any good? Can someone tweet her this thread? And maybe Jeremy Corbyn too, see how effective they are as an opposition?

mercifulTehlu · 22/03/2016 13:47

Actually I've just done a bit of research - apparently there are what are called 'Diocesan Multi-Academy Trusts' in various parts of the country. There's a document produced by the CofE in 2014 which suggests that currently many rural church primaries are on their own or in little gangs of two or three, but that if they want to give themselves a better chance of survival they had better join these Diocesan MATs.

Peregrina · 22/03/2016 13:52

So it might not really affect small primaries in a big way? Presumably the church still owns the land, so there won't be any leasing of land at peppercorn rents to contend with.

Valentine2 · 22/03/2016 13:54

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

curluponthesofa · 22/03/2016 13:56

Lucy Powell is Shadow Education Secretary, I've not heard much about her
www.parliament.uk/biographies/commons/lucy-powell/4263
She actually already tweeted about this thread herself so she is aware of it.

Valentine2 · 22/03/2016 13:57

Excuse me? Why did you delete my message? 😳

rollonthesummer · 22/03/2016 13:59

I've found it-it was Harriet Harman.

link

She answered 5 questions in a whole hour and when later criticised for it, said she was sorry, her answers must have been too long!

It's pitiful!

Valentine2 · 22/03/2016 13:59

Oh sorry then MNHQ
MY FAULT 😣

LineyReborn · 22/03/2016 14:04

I was just reading Valentine's message and it was deleted! It wasn't particularly offensive - if you accept the public, political role of being a Cabinet Minister or Secretary of State and then create an educational shitstorm, IMHO you are fair game to be called dim, surely?

The message also said if the Secretary of State accepted the web chat invitation it would be nice if the 'trick' of taking 25 minutes to write the initial greeting wasn't used. I think that's fair comment, given the overall context.

But it's interesting that MNHQ are 'on' this so quickly. There may have been complaints from the sensitive Secretary of State's office.

JustineMumsnet · 22/03/2016 14:05

@Valentine2

Excuse me? Why did you delete my message? 😳

Hi Valentine. Deleted because it contained a personal attack.

HamaTime · 22/03/2016 14:05

www.newstatesman.com/politics/education/2016/03/george-osborne-just-announced-biggest-appropriation-church-land

This from the New Statesman re church land. The land will be owned by the church, but will be enforceably leased to the academy chain. i don't know what wold happen if the academy chain offered a shilling a year for 125 years, or if the church told the government to get tae fuck and did with the land whatever they wanted. Whatever happens it's somewhat arrogant of Nicky to just decide that the church will gaily hand over their schools to private businesses.

Valentine2 · 22/03/2016 14:08

oh ok JUSTINE

JustineMumsnet · 22/03/2016 14:09

@LineyReborn

I was just reading Valentine's message and it was deleted! It wasn't particularly offensive - if you accept the public, political role of being a Cabinet Minister or Secretary of State and then create an educational shitstorm, IMHO you are fair game to be called dim, surely?

The message also said if the Secretary of State accepted the web chat invitation it would be nice if the 'trick' of taking 25 minutes to write the initial greeting wasn't used. I think that's fair comment, given the overall context.

But it's interesting that MNHQ are 'on' this so quickly. There may have been complaints from the sensitive Secretary of State's office.

No complaints from anyone - we're just applying the same rules for guest posts as we do for MN users - no personal attacks. It's completely possible, I'm sure you agree, to make you argument without resorting to personal attacks.

Caprinihahahaha · 22/03/2016 14:11

hahaha

rollonthesummer · 22/03/2016 14:12

As you're currently reading this thread, Justine--can you possibly tell us if you have any plan to follow it up with Nicky Morgan?

TwoLeftSocks · 22/03/2016 14:14

Thankscurl glad she's aware of it. Useful link too, she's already put in a written request around budget costs for the conversions. Week be interesting to see if/what she raises over it all.

JustineMumsnet · 22/03/2016 14:15

@rollonthesummer

As you're currently reading this thread, Justine--can you possibly tell us if you have any plan to follow it up with Nicky Morgan?

NM's office are aware of the thread and we asked them last night to follow up - both with evidence to address some specific points raised on the thread and/or a webchat. We haven't heard back as yet. Will keep you posted as and when we do.

rollonthesummer · 22/03/2016 14:16

Excellent-thank you!

LineyReborn · 22/03/2016 14:23

I've just written to my MP and alerted them to Nicky Morgan's voluntary opening statement on this thread, the continuing absence of supporting data, and the responses from posters/voters - and the Guardian article about it.