Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Guest posts

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

Guest post: Nicky Morgan - "Why academisation is best for our schools"

999 replies

MumsnetGuestPosts · 18/03/2016 17:09

As parents, we all want the best for our children. We want to make sure they have access to the best opportunities and to help them grow up into well-rounded adults. Making sure that our children have a high quality education is a key part of that.

I want to outline exactly what academisation means and why I truly believe this is the best way forward for our schools. Our children only have one shot at receiving the best education and I am committed to ensuring this happens as swiftly as possible.

We need to put our trust into the hands of the people that know best how to run our schools - the teachers - and the academy system does just that. tells you more about what an academy is. It gives schools greater autonomy to make the decisions that are right for their community and pupils. After all, we have the finest generation of teachers ever and being part of an academy helps put the power back in their hands.

The most recent results show that the percentage of pupils achieving the expected level in reading, writing and maths at the end of Key Stage 2 in primary academies has risen by 4%, from 67% in 2014 to 71% in 2015. Additionally, when it comes to secondary, it's a similar story with converter academies which are performing 7.2% above the national average, with 64.3% of pupils achieving five good GCSEs.

However, a dynamic school system where all schools are academies is just one part of a much wider plan to improve our education system which I set out yesterday in our white paper.

It is every parent's right to know their child is in an excellent school no matter where in the country they live. I am confident that this move will guarantee a higher school standard with each academy held to account for the performance of their pupils.

Ultimately, I am committed to making it easier for you as a parent to play an even more active role in your child's education. In essence, I want to put young people and parents first – something that might sound obvious, but the truth is that for too long parents have been an afterthought in our education system. We want you as parents to have a much stronger voice in what happens to your child during their school years, because we know that you want the very best for your child.

So how are we doing that? Firstly, I am well aware that the education system can appear complex to many parents. I am dedicated to changing this once and for all, and putting the control firmly back in your hands. As a result of this, I plan to introduce a new, online Parents Portal from as early as next year. This portal will enable parents' access to key information and allow you to support your child's learning.

Alongside this, we have changed the curriculum and the way that students will be assessed. This will help to raise standards and make sure that your child leaves school with the knowledge and skills they need to succeed. It is imperative that every child fulfils their potential, and this includes stretching the most able pupils.

More young people will also study the EBacc - a combination of maths, English, two sciences, a humanity and a language - up to the age of 16. And the exams and qualifications young people are awarded will set a new international gold standard that is respected by employers, helping them to succeed in our increasingly global world.

I am a firm believer that an exceptional education transforms children's futures and everything outlined in this White Paper is committed to ensuring that parents and pupils come first. Our goal must always be to ensure every single child leaves school with the best education and the opportunity to excel in adult life. I believe that together, we can achieve that goal.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
5
LineyReborn · 22/03/2016 19:46

Yy. They are still the same children, in the same families. In the same homes. In the same situations out of school. And mostly with the same friendship groups in school.

rollonthesummer · 22/03/2016 19:47

How much money is it going to cost to turn all these thousands of schools into academies as well. Surely that needs to be properly costed before it is considered?

I can't imagine it'll be cheap; will it come out of GO's budget?!

FranHastings · 22/03/2016 19:51

Labour reckon £560 million. Conservatives say less. www.bbc.co.uk/news/education-35832743

Whatever it is, it's a shameful, disgusting waste of money.

curluponthesofa · 22/03/2016 19:52

rollonthesummer - that is a very good question. It was not detailed in the budget.

Lucy Powell (Shadow Education Secretary) asked this question on 18 March:
"To ask Mr Chancellor of the Exchequer, with reference to paragraph 1.27 of Budget 2016, for what reason the full academisation of schools in England is not included in his Department's Budget 2016 policy costings report; and what costings his Department has related to that policy."

There hasn't been a reply yet.

Figmentofmyimagination · 22/03/2016 19:54

That's a lot of money, but I suspect it isn't anywhere near the huge 'saving' they envisage if they get to walk away from teachers' pensions.

rollonthesummer · 22/03/2016 20:11

Is the chancellor obliged to answer Lucy Powell's question or can they just ignore it?

curluponthesofa · 22/03/2016 20:31

I thought they had to answer written questions within a week, but I may be wrong.

curluponthesofa · 22/03/2016 20:52

Yes I imagine the Governments thinks the savings will outweigh the costs, if Academies can set their own pay and benefits for teachers....

Parents aren't stupid, they know that at the heart of a good school is good teachers.
My DC's school went from Satisfactory to Good, and results have improved massively, it's gone from being under- to over-subscribed. The change wasn't due to being turned into an Academy, or some corporate Governing Body or CEO being parachuted in. It was due to a new Head who works incredibly hard, is committed, engaged, cares about the pupils, values the arts, supports teachers, has brought in excellent new staff, and has created a warm and nurturing environment, with the full support of parents and the Governing Body. Parents know a good Head when they see one and they can sniff out a phony one a mile off!

I really worry at the amount of teachers leaving the profession. I have three school-age children. Who will be left to teach them? Surely this is the crisis Nicky Morgan should be spending her time and energy addressing?

PalmerViolet · 22/03/2016 21:04

The children at my local school are still the same whether you call it an academy or not.

This might not be the case though if 'academisation' happens.

Academies will be able to simply tell parents of children with SEND or who can't afford the new uniforms or are suffering from ill health themselves that their children are surplus to requirements and there is almost nothing anyone can do to stop it.

There seems to be little to no provision for those children though, so do they simply fall through the cracks? Presumably we parents of children that don't fit neatly into a round peg will have to make alternative arrangements either at private schools or by home education.

That'll save loads of money.

Fedup21 · 22/03/2016 21:11

There are a lot of children with SEN out there though- they can't all slip through the net. Where will they go? Which academies will want them messing their results up?!

curluponthesofa · 22/03/2016 21:26

www.lucypowell.org.uk/lucy_announces_labour_s_commitment_to_making_pshe_compulsory
Lucy Powell has just announced she would make PSHE compulsory in state schools. So she seems to be doing something - just not on Academies...

Nicky Morgan was against compulsory PSHE, despite a campaign by charities and MPs, a decision I thought was crazy at the time. (Mind you if Academies don't have to follow the curriculum it won't matter will it - they can tell the children babies are brought by the stork....)

PalmerViolet · 22/03/2016 21:38

Exactly Fedup.

Why would you choose to take my fabulous, engaging, but ultimately 'failing' DS when you can take a 'normal' child?

Josiegrosie1983 · 22/03/2016 21:46

Don't they just! I have been a pastoral leader at school and I can tell you without doubt one of the biggest issues in schools is some of the terrible parenting. It's funny how teachers fail, schools fail, this is reported on a lot but it's hell to pay if you mention the parents! I would definitely say that a bigger problem is the government changes of curriculum and what is the accepted way to be a teacher, and political factors. It's suffocating when you teach in a deprivated area and even those students who don't really follow the news can tell you about how the government are ballsing up the education system! Also, schools will also fail because they change grade boundaries to ensure only so many students pass... Therefore a proportion of students will always fail and therefore schools who will fail.... I'm not saying all schools are good, they're definitely not. But the little flexibility of curriculum and options that the government want us to do= really difficult to make progress for some... Even more difficult when parents aren't supportive!

rollonthesummer · 22/03/2016 21:53

Why on earth has Lucy Powell been writing about PHSE?! Shouldn't she be doing something about the mess that is happening in our schools this very moment?! It seems to be missing the point somehow!

schoolimprover · 22/03/2016 22:11

Wholesale top-down reorganisation of schools will not improve them. We already have evidence that there is varying quality in terms of academies and academy chains, just like there is in LA maintained schools. Indeed, some academy chains have more inadequate schools than those in the worst performing Local Authorities. Headteachers should not be spending time taking their eyes off the ball whilst they navigate complex and ill-thought out organisational issues. This reform is purely ideologically driven, with one aim in mind i.e. the privatisation of schools by the back door. The only winners will be so-called academy CEOs on fat cat salaries who are paid more depending on how many schools they can take over. The losers will be parents and children, who will have nowhere to go with any concerns or complaints once their voices have been silenced on governing bodies. They will have no local council school officers to help or advise them. What we really need is investment in teacher training and ongoing professional development, coupled with a proper plan to recruit and retain good school leaders. We also need a moratorium on further changes to inspections, the curriculum and assessment and much, much less political interference in schools.

GColdtimer · 22/03/2016 22:19

Roll I think it's in response to a recent report saying sexting amongst teens is up a zillion percent or something along those lines - there has been a lot in the pressabout it.

She has said she will fight it: labourlist.org/2016/03/labour-will-fight-to-retain-parents-voice-in-the-schools-system/

Mner · 22/03/2016 22:25

Justine ask her to do a webchat Smile

rollonthesummer · 22/03/2016 22:32

Fair enough- good for her :)

Does she mention the changes to QTS there- I hope she objects to that too!

nlondondad · 22/03/2016 22:38

There is another Mumsnet thread here.

www.mumsnet.com/Talk/primary/2597423-Mumsnet-made-the-news-again?watched=1&msgid=60024390#60024390

Its turning into a discussion of whether or not there should be elected parent governors.

BridgetChapman · 22/03/2016 22:59

Lucy Powell has retweeted my petition petition.parliament.uk/petitions/124747 and has also agreed to speak at the rally in Westminster tomorrow www.teachers.org.uk/news-events/press-releases-england/nut-atl-london-rally-against-forced-academies so she is definitely taking a stand over this. It does feel like various groups that might not have worked together before are coming together over this. That can only be a good thing. I'm so delighted she's supporting this campaign.

antiqueroadhoe · 22/03/2016 23:05

Feel cynical and hate to piss on your chips, but governments don't listen to teachers or care about getting it right. They care about saving money and having lots of data for accountability. Junior doctors have far more sway and respect and they aren't getting anywhere. Schools will get more and more shit and that's just it. It's all a great big shit sandwich and all our kids have to take a bite.

noblegiraffe · 22/03/2016 23:06

Article here from the think tank guy who advocated complete academisation in a paper in 2014

www.tes.com/news/school-news/breaking-views/anything-other-full-academisation-would-be-confusing-and-distracti-1

Nothing about academies being better, but that running two systems is apparently confusing and expensive.

TwoLeftSocks · 22/03/2016 23:06

I'm really glad this thread and the petitions have happened. I'll be joining our local march tomorrow.

clopper · 22/03/2016 23:20

I am concerned that this issue was and continues to be largely ignored by much of the media apart from the guardian. It feels deliberate. I can see that the terrible incidents in Brussels today make the issue seem trivial, but even before this point over the last few days there has been barely a mention.

curluponthesofa · 22/03/2016 23:26

Bridget that's great, well done.

Has anyone noticed that prettybrightfireflies, after posting on this thread almost constantly, has gone very quiet?
There's another strange thing. The Guardian article 'Nicky Morgan under fire on mumsnet' which first came out on Monday, has been edited since. In the first version prettybrightfireflies was not mentioned. It was later amended to include her comments.
I only realised because when I read it the first time I was looking to see which comments they'd used (not at all looking for my own posts, of course....Grin) I read the article again today and noticed it had been amended to include pretty's posts. (Fortunately the Internet rather handily caches websites, so I checked the cached page to make sure I didn't imagine this). Do you think Nicky's press office leaned on the Guardian to include some comments in favour of academies? It's a bit unfair though as pretty was a lone (if frequent) voice in favour.

The cached article from Monday:
<a class="break-all" href="http://web.archive.org/web/20160321174540/www.theguardian.com/education/2016/mar/21/nicky-morgan-under-fire-over-mumsnet-post-on-academisation" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">web.archive.org/web/20160321174540/www.theguardian.com/education/2016/mar/21/nicky-morgan-under-fire-over-mumsnet-post-on-academisation

The current article:
www.theguardian.com/education/2016/mar/21/nicky-morgan-under-fire-over-mumsnet-post-on-academisation

Swipe left for the next trending thread