Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Guest posts

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

Guest post: Nicky Morgan - "Why academisation is best for our schools"

999 replies

MumsnetGuestPosts · 18/03/2016 17:09

As parents, we all want the best for our children. We want to make sure they have access to the best opportunities and to help them grow up into well-rounded adults. Making sure that our children have a high quality education is a key part of that.

I want to outline exactly what academisation means and why I truly believe this is the best way forward for our schools. Our children only have one shot at receiving the best education and I am committed to ensuring this happens as swiftly as possible.

We need to put our trust into the hands of the people that know best how to run our schools - the teachers - and the academy system does just that. tells you more about what an academy is. It gives schools greater autonomy to make the decisions that are right for their community and pupils. After all, we have the finest generation of teachers ever and being part of an academy helps put the power back in their hands.

The most recent results show that the percentage of pupils achieving the expected level in reading, writing and maths at the end of Key Stage 2 in primary academies has risen by 4%, from 67% in 2014 to 71% in 2015. Additionally, when it comes to secondary, it's a similar story with converter academies which are performing 7.2% above the national average, with 64.3% of pupils achieving five good GCSEs.

However, a dynamic school system where all schools are academies is just one part of a much wider plan to improve our education system which I set out yesterday in our white paper.

It is every parent's right to know their child is in an excellent school no matter where in the country they live. I am confident that this move will guarantee a higher school standard with each academy held to account for the performance of their pupils.

Ultimately, I am committed to making it easier for you as a parent to play an even more active role in your child's education. In essence, I want to put young people and parents first – something that might sound obvious, but the truth is that for too long parents have been an afterthought in our education system. We want you as parents to have a much stronger voice in what happens to your child during their school years, because we know that you want the very best for your child.

So how are we doing that? Firstly, I am well aware that the education system can appear complex to many parents. I am dedicated to changing this once and for all, and putting the control firmly back in your hands. As a result of this, I plan to introduce a new, online Parents Portal from as early as next year. This portal will enable parents' access to key information and allow you to support your child's learning.

Alongside this, we have changed the curriculum and the way that students will be assessed. This will help to raise standards and make sure that your child leaves school with the knowledge and skills they need to succeed. It is imperative that every child fulfils their potential, and this includes stretching the most able pupils.

More young people will also study the EBacc - a combination of maths, English, two sciences, a humanity and a language - up to the age of 16. And the exams and qualifications young people are awarded will set a new international gold standard that is respected by employers, helping them to succeed in our increasingly global world.

I am a firm believer that an exceptional education transforms children's futures and everything outlined in this White Paper is committed to ensuring that parents and pupils come first. Our goal must always be to ensure every single child leaves school with the best education and the opportunity to excel in adult life. I believe that together, we can achieve that goal.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
5
TwoLeftSocks · 22/03/2016 09:20

I think you're right forkhandles. It'll at least have to be considered for debate though so I think it'll be even more immigrant to write to MPs to make sure it gets a proper discussion.

biddy53 · 22/03/2016 09:27

This must not be allowed to disappear between IDS and terror attacks and general press ignoring.

I think the plan is to bury it under IDS's resignation - the fact that NM has ignored this thread so far suggests she does not want to fan the flames by engaging with the public. I had hoped that her silence meant that she was busy composing her resignation letter but after her Newsnight appearance it is clear that she won't let the facts get in the way of her career. I am shocked that Evan Davis failed to ask one question about "academisation".

Letseatgrandma · 22/03/2016 09:33

I am shocked that Evan Davis failed to ask one question about "academisation"

Me too. This can't just be buried. Once it's approved, it'll be too late.

I wrote to my MP about this at some length last night; I was so angry.

curluponthesofa · 22/03/2016 09:40

Re the 'parent portal' - I seriously doubt Academies will really let parents use it as a forum for discussion. One of our local Academies is notorious for shutting down any negative debates on forums - the posts just disappear! (Including off mumsnet, so I won't mention the name of the school). It's become a bit of a joke. I presume the Academy PR office comes down heavy on the forum to remove it.

So my question is, what will a Parent Portal give on top of what we already have from the school /Ofsted/LA/DfE websites?

Fedup21 · 22/03/2016 09:46

I doubt a parent portal will give parents anything! It certainly won't be used for open discussion. It'll probably just give some Tory friends jobs in setting it up.

The academies bill isn't even first on the Education section of the BBC news app! It's a story about sexting!

Fedup21 · 22/03/2016 09:52

It's not under the UK, Top Stories or Children sections either Shock

curluponthesofa · 22/03/2016 10:51

I have looked through the White Paper and cannot see any information about how much this whole process will cost. Why isn't anyone doing any analysis of the cost of Academy conversion and whether this money would be better spent improving the current system? There had been lots of analysis of the welfare reform and budget impact but nothing on this!

Also how much will the new 'parent portal' cost? The government does not have a good track record of IT projects being delivered on time and in budget .... At a time when we are being told the country needs to make cuts we need to be told the cost of this new 'portal'.

School applications - it says they are 'consulting' on how best to run the application process. Very woolly. This is something pretty crucial!

My opinion is that because Gideon is coming under such pressure on the disability benefit cuts they are trying to hide the Academies issue to avoid any more negative publicity. I often wonder if we have a free press in this country any more.

rollonthesummer · 22/03/2016 10:57

I don't think we do have a free press, no.

I have a horrible feeling this academies white paper will be missed in between all the IDS stuff (if I was cynical--I'd say that's why he resigned...to give the press something dramatic to talk about whilst they swished this through undetected!).

noblegiraffe · 22/03/2016 11:06

Nearly half of teachers in England plan to leave within the next 5 years.

www.theguardian.com/education/2016/mar/22/teachers-plan-leave-five-years-survey-workload-england

Good thing that academies don't have to hire qualified teachers, eh?

Fedup21 · 22/03/2016 11:16

I rather suspect why this academy bill is being passed through so hurriedly. Nicky would have had to admit to the recruitment and retention crisis sooner or later otherwise. This way, she doesn't have to as they won't NEED qualified teachers. She can bang on about QTS being an unnecessary barrier that gets in the way of simply brilliant potential teachers who for some unimaginable reason couldn't be arsed to train, and will fill up the staff rooms with anyone willing to work 12 hour days for about £12k. The pay and conditions will be gone in a flash and so will the holidays, I would imagine. A working parents' dream? 52 weeks of free childcare?

KateMumsnet · 22/03/2016 11:56

Hello all

Quick follow up on Michael Gove's disappearing webchat posts - thanks very much for pointing this out.

We've done some investigating and it seems likely to be a tech glitch. The same thing has happened to a lesser degree to several other webchats from around the same time - for example Douglas Alexander, Yvette Cooper and Caroline Lucas.

Luckily all these webchats were written up into easy-to-read pages, so haven't gone pouf altogether - Michael Gove's is here, for example. And in fact it's possible that this process had something to do with the posts disappearing (via editor error!).

We're going to be restoring all the missing posts from the other webchats later today - thanks again for alerting us.

Valentine2 · 22/03/2016 11:59

Morning everyone

MNHQ (no point trying to get JUSTINE to respond, eh?🙄 You were surprised at the response I read but honestly we earn a few word from you as this really is a atonal emergency, don't you think? )

So was there a reminder sent to her this morning? While the iron is red? And if no response by tonight, ARE YOU READY TO STAMP "DISGRACE" ACROSS THIS POST OR JUST WANT US ALL TO GET BORED AND MOVE ON (to some other country perhaps now and of course away from Mumsnet too)?

Biddy

She actually managed to moan that Evan should have showed her the godfosaken graph before she came on live tv!!! The cheek!
Is there a way to drag these people (Nicky Morgan and Co) to court? I want to learn more about this please if someone around here has some knowledge about this?

Valentine2 · 22/03/2016 12:00

"National emergency " is what I wanted to write to JUSTINE in the last post

LaBelleDameSansPatience · 22/03/2016 12:06

Petition signed.

Valentine2 · 22/03/2016 12:08

Rollonthesummer

Yes it looks like it . The way they are basically trying to insert IDS into every thing. There is apparently far more money involved in the academies scam than the disability cuts over which he has purportedly resigned (under no circumstances I can imagine to minimise the devastating news effects of those cuts though, just trying not to compare the money involved).

It's urgent matter now MNHQ. Pls push her.

chiaralev · 22/03/2016 12:32

This is nothing to do with quality of education: independent sources such as the Sutton Trust and even the Chief of Osfted have highlighted the Academy chains’ mixed results. It all boils down to money and to this government’s purely ideological position that unchained liberalism is better than an efficient and fair state providing for the most vulnerable, a category that in my view includes also children.

I’m worried about a huge chunk of tax payers’ money being handed over to academies who are not accountable to us taxpayers but to a very few civil servants overseeing thousands of schools (I suppose we can't call these bureaucrats). I’m worried about not being able to be part of my children’s school’s decisions. I worry about 125 year leases to academies, valuable public property being handed over to unaccountable bodies. I’m sad about the disappearance of the support network local schools and Local authorities have created to share knowledge and best practice. Most of all I worry about the tendency of academies to drop children with problems to boost their results.

If the Government thinks the interference of bureaucrats in education is too much , why not starting by reducing the ridiculous requirements and directives for state schools in terms of curriculum, testing and marking? Oh, and I forgot the latest about exclamation marks!

It’s always struck me as paradoxical that the Government is micromanaging state schools, but then it leaves "freedom" to free schools, independent schools and academies. Are children from non-maintained schools second class citizens who don’t merit the Government’s obsessive attention? Or perhaps are these schools deemed inherently better because free from the shackle of the government’s own directives? If so, why does the Government not act consistently and backs off by giving state schools freedom and means to focus on the topical issues such as attracting and retaining good teachers, paying them properly, allowing them to enjoy their job?

It shouldn't be so difficult, unless the real reason for this catastrophic change is , as we all suspect, to slash local government’s funding and hand over the future of this country to the market’s forces.
Enough with the narrative that it’s the LA’s fault. Enough treating us as if we were idiots incapable of reading the Government’s subtext and deciphering all their lies. The Government makes the laws and sets the budget.

AllTheOtherUserNamesAreTaken · 22/03/2016 12:54

chiaralev your post says it all

Valentine2 · 22/03/2016 13:10

I am sick of the way Corbyn deals with Tories in the parliament debates. He treats them like children! Labour managed to ask five questions from Osborne today who finally came out of hiding (probably hoping that majority of media is focused on Brussels right now and also because he has no way out ) but there is no one who could bother to inquire about the scam about academization.

rollonthesummer · 22/03/2016 13:11

I presume GO isn't going to mention academies in his speech as that's more Nicky's field of 'expertise' -I use that word very lightly.

Mumsnet-are you going to make any response to Nicky Morgan as a result of this thread? The thread has been mentioned in the papers and lots of parents and teachers here are very anxious and concerned about what will happen to our schools. Is there something you can do to raise awareness?

rollonthesummer · 22/03/2016 13:19

Academies don't even have to follow the healthy eating regulations that lea schools do!

bbc

Valentine2 · 22/03/2016 13:23

MNHQ
Looks like you are waiting in vain to hear from a woman who is probably running around her office like a headless chicken now to back up the claims she made in the post here by some data, ANY data somehow ASAP.
So what's the plan? How long would you wait until declaring that she is not coming back for a live web chat?

curluponthesofa · 22/03/2016 13:24

I have written to my MP (for what good it will do) - if you want to write to yours you can do so here
www.writetothem.com/

I also agree we need to push NM for a response.

mercifulTehlu · 22/03/2016 13:26

Great post Chiaralev. It's all so damned depressing. And I'd love to know what they claim to be trying to achieve with the 'parent portal'. It sounds like a bit of pacifying nonsense to me - a token gesture to make parents feel as though they are having some kind of say in something.

The other thing that really worries me is what will happen to all the small primary schools. My dc go to a wonderful village primary with fewer than 50 pupils. There are quite a lot that size in our area. I doubt that academy chains are going to be interested in taking on little schools like that, so I'm guessing they will close.

Peregrina · 22/03/2016 13:27

Has MNHQ given Nicky Morgan a timescale in which to respond? They should, everyone else has to meet targets so why not her?

I doubt if she is running around like a headless chicken, she wrote such patronising waffle, doesn't realise that she needs to back it up with facts and probably doesn't even realise how much anger she has stirred up.

Fedup21 · 22/03/2016 13:28

I have written to my MP too-I fully expect the usual reply though. He tells me that Nick Gibb says there's never been a better time to be a teacher (bollocks) and that Nicky Morgan says there are more teachers than ever before. Possibly true, but there are lots more children than ever before.

Nobody listens though-they just don't care. What can you do if your MP doesn't care, the Secretary of State doesn't care and the press don't care? Clearly over 100,000 people cared enough to sign a petition and there are protest marches tomorrow, but what can we DO? If the commons and Lords pass it-it's done?