Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Guest posts

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

Guest post: Nicky Morgan - "Why academisation is best for our schools"

999 replies

MumsnetGuestPosts · 18/03/2016 17:09

As parents, we all want the best for our children. We want to make sure they have access to the best opportunities and to help them grow up into well-rounded adults. Making sure that our children have a high quality education is a key part of that.

I want to outline exactly what academisation means and why I truly believe this is the best way forward for our schools. Our children only have one shot at receiving the best education and I am committed to ensuring this happens as swiftly as possible.

We need to put our trust into the hands of the people that know best how to run our schools - the teachers - and the academy system does just that. tells you more about what an academy is. It gives schools greater autonomy to make the decisions that are right for their community and pupils. After all, we have the finest generation of teachers ever and being part of an academy helps put the power back in their hands.

The most recent results show that the percentage of pupils achieving the expected level in reading, writing and maths at the end of Key Stage 2 in primary academies has risen by 4%, from 67% in 2014 to 71% in 2015. Additionally, when it comes to secondary, it's a similar story with converter academies which are performing 7.2% above the national average, with 64.3% of pupils achieving five good GCSEs.

However, a dynamic school system where all schools are academies is just one part of a much wider plan to improve our education system which I set out yesterday in our white paper.

It is every parent's right to know their child is in an excellent school no matter where in the country they live. I am confident that this move will guarantee a higher school standard with each academy held to account for the performance of their pupils.

Ultimately, I am committed to making it easier for you as a parent to play an even more active role in your child's education. In essence, I want to put young people and parents first – something that might sound obvious, but the truth is that for too long parents have been an afterthought in our education system. We want you as parents to have a much stronger voice in what happens to your child during their school years, because we know that you want the very best for your child.

So how are we doing that? Firstly, I am well aware that the education system can appear complex to many parents. I am dedicated to changing this once and for all, and putting the control firmly back in your hands. As a result of this, I plan to introduce a new, online Parents Portal from as early as next year. This portal will enable parents' access to key information and allow you to support your child's learning.

Alongside this, we have changed the curriculum and the way that students will be assessed. This will help to raise standards and make sure that your child leaves school with the knowledge and skills they need to succeed. It is imperative that every child fulfils their potential, and this includes stretching the most able pupils.

More young people will also study the EBacc - a combination of maths, English, two sciences, a humanity and a language - up to the age of 16. And the exams and qualifications young people are awarded will set a new international gold standard that is respected by employers, helping them to succeed in our increasingly global world.

I am a firm believer that an exceptional education transforms children's futures and everything outlined in this White Paper is committed to ensuring that parents and pupils come first. Our goal must always be to ensure every single child leaves school with the best education and the opportunity to excel in adult life. I believe that together, we can achieve that goal.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
5
curluponthesofa · 22/03/2016 14:24

twoleftsocks - yes I noticed that she had tabled that question re costings too. I would love to know the answer.
I have tweeted her anyway to ask what Labour is doing re the White Paper.

Valentine2 · 22/03/2016 14:25

Oh ok I will be civil from now on. Just don't let this thread go anywhere. Honestly it will suck the life out of my next five years' plans for my kids if I have it home school my DCs.

Peregrina · 22/03/2016 14:44

Interesting HamaTime - it would be good if the Church said, right, we'll pull out of education all together, thus calling NM's bluff. The DoE would be in a hopeless position and it might kill the programme off stone dead. It won't happen though.

Valentine2 · 22/03/2016 14:55

I can't get to the tv right now but can someone please tell me if ANYONE raised the issue of schools at the parliamentary debate so far? The disability cuts are the focus right now. How come Labour is missing this really important issue on such an important day? Nothing on social media so far that could tell me they did raise it.

LineyReborn · 22/03/2016 15:09

Labour started all this nonsense when Ruth Kelly was Secretary of State for Education. Maybe Labour are a bit sensitive, too.

WhittonMum1 · 22/03/2016 15:09

She isn´t very consistent in her ideas. How can Nicky Morgan say in this guest Mumsnet post that we have "the finest generation of teachers ever" yet at the same time she plans to scrap the current initial teacher training and induction process used to award Qualified Teacher Status (QTS).

Scrapping QTS gives heads the chance to fast track trainee teachers into shortage subject posts. This is important given current the teacher recruitment crisis. It is made to sound as though standards will be improving with the new system. I think it gives the opportunity for schools to recruit even more teaching staff, but what will the new system consist of exactly?

Scrapping QTS means that the numbers of teachers with QTS at a school will become an irrelevant and meaningless statistic. A fig-leaf for the increasing number of unqualified teachers that could be recruited into schools?

Nicky Morgan doesn't much value the current system for teacher training as she recently said about QTS: “...being an almost automatic award to staff who complete initial teacher training and a year in the classroom...". I think a lot of teaching staff would disagree that QTS after the initial teacher training and a year in the classroom was 'an automatic award'. Sounds as if she thinks they just turn up and get QTS at the end of it.

To obtain QTS teachers must provide suitable evidence for each of the teachers' standards. There are also professional skills tests to complete. The drop-out rates are always high as obtaining QTS is not easy.

She says: "it will be for the teaching profession itself to decide when a teacher is ready to be accredited. This will ensure that the decision is made by those who know best what makes a great teacher: outstanding schools and heads.” Outstanding schools have always been involved in teacher training and senior teachers have been already been observing and assessing those teachers. This isn't anything new.

So when she says: "the new accreditation will be awarded when teachers have demonstrated deep subject knowledge and the ability to teach well". I'm not sure what she feels teachers who gained QTS were doing to gain that qualification previously. The QTS standards after all were government standards.

This is not a statement from Nicky Morgan which is going to go to help the teacher recruitment and retention crisis. Imagine if those qualified teachers suggested that Nicky Morgan´s law qualification was an ´automatic award´ for the practice of law. It is an insult to those professionals.

As for scrapping parent governors she says: "The new emphasis will be on the skills – for example in business or finance – that an individual brings to a governing body". This sort of implies that those parent governors weren't bringing any other skills to those governing bodies apart from being a parent. I'm sure we can all agree that that isn't really fair on those who are currently parent-governors. But it is rather telling of the way this is heading when business and finance expertise in particular are mentioned.

If the individuals with those skills that are to be elected governors instead of parent-governors are also parents then I don't really see what changes. Unless if they are also parents of children at the school then they are no longer eligible to be elected. I doubt they would do that. Seems to me like she is trying to reinvent the wheel.

curluponthesofa · 22/03/2016 15:09

I haven't seen it on tv but have read most of the summaries and can't find a single mention of schools. The Guardian have a live summary going:
www.theguardian.com/politics/blog/live/2016/mar/22/osborne-budget-debate-speech-pip-as-hague-and-clarke-criticise-duncan-smith-politics-live
I am dumbfounded why no-one is raising this.

Letseatgrandma · 22/03/2016 15:54

Why is this just being ignored??

appieclappie · 22/03/2016 16:06

This particular crop of Tories is degenerate. If you want to understand what the future of education looks like under an academy model, just study the American system. Don't wish it on your children! Here's the American experience: (Mumsnet, this is not a plug) saynotoacademyschools.blogspot.com

Valentine2 · 22/03/2016 16:14

My MP is silent. No replies to my messages or anything at all. No reply from Lucy Powell and no reply from Nicky Morgan. Either "We are all in this together " or could be that Labour is so overwhelmed (read incompetent to deal at multiple fronts) by the IDS saga that they can't come up with a proper strategy or can't be bothered yet.

TwoLeftSocks · 22/03/2016 16:15

Does anyone know where the whole thing about parent governors has even come from? Is she assuming that wanting to ensure our children have a good education is some sort of conflict of interest? Is she assuming we don't have useful skills beyond nattering in the school yard? Does she think we're not professional enough our pulling our weight? Clarification very welcome.

TwoLeftSocks · 22/03/2016 16:16

Sorry, the parent gov thing is annoying me the more I think about it.

WhittonMum1 · 22/03/2016 16:26

Seems like Nicky Morgan is reacting to the Ofsted Chief Inspector's recommendations with regard to parent governance.

Valentine2 · 22/03/2016 16:28

Twoleftsocks
To be fair, i have no clue where the WHOLE of this idea came from actually and I am nearly sure now that NIcky Mirgan does not have any supporting evidence either. They just though oh we have won an election and obviously can get away with loads. They underestimated the anger it was going to generate obviously.

noblegiraffe · 22/03/2016 16:30

I remembered there being a bill about forced academisation for 'coasting' schools last year, the Education and Adoption Bill, so looked it up and it's apparently going through the Lords.
On the 8th February, there were some amendments, one of which says in explanatory notes '10 Lords Amendment 3 would provide that the Secretary of State must define in regulations what “coasting” means.'

www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/bills/cbill/2015-2016/0129/en/16129en.pdf

They were trying to to pass through the bill to force academisation on any school that the Secretary of State merely 'considered' to be coasting. The Lords are now asking for a clear definition of what coasting means.

Is this why Nicky has gone 'sod this for a game of soldiers, let's just brute force a change on them all'?

Nicky - why have you suddenly changed from wanting to force academisation on coasting schools to include ones that are successful? Is it because you can't be bothered to define 'coasting' or because the Lords want a clear definition of coasting and it can't just be whatever you want it to mean for a particular school?

Valentine2 · 22/03/2016 16:34

Whittonmum
It looks to me that the recommendation was not to scrap parent governors at all. It was actually to strengthen them by trying to attract talent with money. I think that's is where the problem could be? Since he said the current system is not working, and since we know Tories lol like they would rather die than put in more money into the state education, at some point some groups though oh why not scrap the whole things altogether as it is.
I know I know it's a twisted logic. But that my best guess. 😇

Letseatgrandma · 22/03/2016 16:34

I really hope the Lords don't let this bill through Confused

Valentine2 · 22/03/2016 16:36

Sorry for the damn typos 😣
Wanted to write "at some point some genius thought"

Valentine2 · 22/03/2016 16:37

Ha ha
Lords have been hitting Cameron and Co where it really does hurt. No wonder Cameron was threatening to silence them.

WhittonMum1 · 22/03/2016 16:46

He says that school governors should be paid for their work.

This opens up a whole new can of worms. Who decides who to employ and how much they are paid? Do they get industry-like consultancy fees?

Doesn't that then become a conflict of interests of your boss is the headteacher?

Difficult to be anything other than a yes man/woman under those circumstances. Motives might not entirely be in the best interests of the school and students. Certainly does give schools more freedoms though.

nlondondad · 22/03/2016 16:50

Its being ignored in my view for two reasons:-

1.The announcement that all schools are to be Academies never belonged in the budget announcement anyway. The matter should be discussed in a debate on the Education whitepaper. Also the two Parliamentary petitions mentioned elsewhere on this thread have now each been signed by over 100,000 people (and really fast too) which means they must be considered for debate, so both universal, obligatory (otherwise known as "forced") academisation and the seperate abolition of parent governors will likely be debated.

  1. Its a fact of life that the budget falling apart must take priority during a debate on the budget, over academisation, as actually it is politically very serious. Sufficiently mishandled the Government could fall. Unlikely, but possible.
rollonthesummer · 22/03/2016 16:52

Nlondondad-do you think this academy bill will have to be Properly debated now?

LineyReborn · 22/03/2016 16:56

Paying governors at least their expenses / loss of earnings / childcare expenses for attending meetings (frequently at 4-6pm) makes sense.

noblegiraffe · 22/03/2016 16:57

Why was the education white paper released at the same time as the budget? Is this normal procedure? And why was the academies announcement made in the budget if it's the wrong place for it? Does the government not know what it's doing?

nlondondad · 22/03/2016 16:59

Following the whitepaper there will have to be a Bill to implement it.

here is a definition of a whitepaper

"White papers are policy documents produced by the Government that set out their proposals for future legislation. White Papers are often published as Command Papers and may include a draft version of a Bill that is being planned. This provides a basis for further consultation and discussion with interested or affected groups and allows final changes to be made before a Bill is formally presented to Parliament."

Which is why if you do not like what is in a whitepaper it can be worth kicking up a fuss...

A Bill then gets introduced in Parliament and is debated in both Houses. In this case the Lords will have LOTS to say, As they are un elected the more evidence of public disquiet about a Bill the more assertive they feel able to be...