Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Guest post: Nicky Morgan - "Why academisation is best for our schools"

12 replies

MumsnetGuestPosts · 18/03/2016 17:09

As parents, we all want the best for our children. We want to make sure they have access to the best opportunities and to help them grow up into well-rounded adults. Making sure that our children have a high quality education is a key part of that.

I want to outline exactly what academisation means and why I truly believe this is the best way forward for our schools. Our children only have one shot at receiving the best education and I am committed to ensuring this happens as swiftly as possible.

We need to put our trust into the hands of the people that know best how to run our schools - the teachers - and the academy system does just that. tells you more about what an academy is. It gives schools greater autonomy to make the decisions that are right for their community and pupils. After all, we have the finest generation of teachers ever and being part of an academy helps put the power back in their hands.

The most recent results show that the percentage of pupils achieving the expected level in reading, writing and maths at the end of Key Stage 2 in primary academies has risen by 4%, from 67% in 2014 to 71% in 2015. Additionally, when it comes to secondary, it's a similar story with converter academies which are performing 7.2% above the national average, with 64.3% of pupils achieving five good GCSEs.

However, a dynamic school system where all schools are academies is just one part of a much wider plan to improve our education system which I set out yesterday in our white paper.

It is every parent's right to know their child is in an excellent school no matter where in the country they live. I am confident that this move will guarantee a higher school standard with each academy held to account for the performance of their pupils.

Ultimately, I am committed to making it easier for you as a parent to play an even more active role in your child's education. In essence, I want to put young people and parents first – something that might sound obvious, but the truth is that for too long parents have been an afterthought in our education system. We want you as parents to have a much stronger voice in what happens to your child during their school years, because we know that you want the very best for your child.

So how are we doing that? Firstly, I am well aware that the education system can appear complex to many parents. I am dedicated to changing this once and for all, and putting the control firmly back in your hands. As a result of this, I plan to introduce a new, online Parents Portal from as early as next year. This portal will enable parents' access to key information and allow you to support your child's learning.

Alongside this, we have changed the curriculum and the way that students will be assessed. This will help to raise standards and make sure that your child leaves school with the knowledge and skills they need to succeed. It is imperative that every child fulfils their potential, and this includes stretching the most able pupils.

More young people will also study the EBacc - a combination of maths, English, two sciences, a humanity and a language - up to the age of 16. And the exams and qualifications young people are awarded will set a new international gold standard that is respected by employers, helping them to succeed in our increasingly global world.

I am a firm believer that an exceptional education transforms children's futures and everything outlined in this White Paper is committed to ensuring that parents and pupils come first. Our goal must always be to ensure every single child leaves school with the best education and the opportunity to excel in adult life. I believe that together, we can achieve that goal.

KateMumsnet · 19/03/2016 14:03

Hello all

I responded last night on a thread raising similar issues, so apologies if you've heard some of this before.

On the question of balance, we try hard to offer a counterpoint on crunchy issues like this one (the junior doctors' strike is another example). In fact, it was we who approached the Department for Education on Thursday - we asked if they'd like to explain their thinking with regard to academisation, because we already had a very strong guest postfrom a deputy head teacher on this issue putting the opposing view. If we stopped having guest posts from politicians, quite possibly we'd have missed out on the deputy head's post too.

As for engaging on the subsequent thread, it's tricky - we always encourage guest posters to do so and indeed did in this case, but realistically politicians have many commitments and it's often not possible. And as some of you have pointed out, a guest post is by nature a different animal to a webchat, in that there's no obligation to stay on the thread. We think there's value in them nonetheless - they often spark really interesting and passionate debate, and are a prompt for those MNers with an impressive knowledge of the subject in hand to share their perspectives too (as has demonstrably, and powerfully, happened here).

But thanks for your feedback; I'm one of the ones who doesn't officially do the weekends so I'm off to play with the DC now - butwe'll give it some thought when we're all back in the office on Monday. Making sure that posts on similar issues don't go live at EOP on Fridays is a good suggestion - wewere expecting this one on Thursday in fact, but there was a delay.

Thanks all.

KateMumsnet · 19/03/2016 14:04

And apols for the strange spacing - most odd, will investigate.

KateMumsnet · 19/03/2016 16:00

We can certainly ask the DfE for that information on Monday, Valentine2.

KateMumsnet · 21/03/2016 13:12

Hello all

Just to let you know that we've invited Nicky Morgan on for a webchat on this topic, and we've also let her team know that there are calls for supporting data on the thread.

We'll let you know when we've an update.

YetAnotherHelenMumsnet · 21/03/2016 22:26

Evening all.
Thanks for reporting this thread. We can confirm that we are aware of the request and have passed it to the relevant people, however we hope you can understand that we are unlikely to have an answer for you this evening.

KateMumsnet · 22/03/2016 11:56

Hello all

Quick follow up on Michael Gove's disappearing webchat posts - thanks very much for pointing this out.

We've done some investigating and it seems likely to be a tech glitch. The same thing has happened to a lesser degree to several other webchats from around the same time - for example Douglas Alexander, Yvette Cooper and Caroline Lucas.

Luckily all these webchats were written up into easy-to-read pages, so haven't gone pouf altogether - Michael Gove's is here, for example. And in fact it's possible that this process had something to do with the posts disappearing (via editor error!).

We're going to be restoring all the missing posts from the other webchats later today - thanks again for alerting us.

JustineMumsnet · 22/03/2016 14:05

@Valentine2

Excuse me? Why did you delete my message? 😳

Hi Valentine. Deleted because it contained a personal attack.

JustineMumsnet · 22/03/2016 14:09

@LineyReborn

I was just reading Valentine's message and it was deleted! It wasn't particularly offensive - if you accept the public, political role of being a Cabinet Minister or Secretary of State and then create an educational shitstorm, IMHO you are fair game to be called dim, surely?

The message also said if the Secretary of State accepted the web chat invitation it would be nice if the 'trick' of taking 25 minutes to write the initial greeting wasn't used. I think that's fair comment, given the overall context.

But it's interesting that MNHQ are 'on' this so quickly. There may have been complaints from the sensitive Secretary of State's office.

No complaints from anyone - we're just applying the same rules for guest posts as we do for MN users - no personal attacks. It's completely possible, I'm sure you agree, to make you argument without resorting to personal attacks.

JustineMumsnet · 22/03/2016 14:15

@rollonthesummer

As you're currently reading this thread, Justine--can you possibly tell us if you have any plan to follow it up with Nicky Morgan?

NM's office are aware of the thread and we asked them last night to follow up - both with evidence to address some specific points raised on the thread and/or a webchat. We haven't heard back as yet. Will keep you posted as and when we do.

JustineMumsnet · 22/03/2016 17:22

@rollonthesummer

I agree with Valentine on the 'disgrace' comment. Something should be written to draw a line under this post if Nicky Morgan doesn't respond adequately. Otherwise, it has achieved nothing; politicians can continue to come onto Mumsnet, spout whatever they want to without any evidence and there's no repercussions for them.

I hope Justine thinks we're worth more than that?

I'm not sure I agree that this thread is worth nothing - it has revealed to Mumsnetters and anyone else looking (which given that the media has picked it up is quite a lot of people) the strength of feeling about this policy. I do think, and we always advise guest posters such, that it's better to engage with comments, criticism and questions than to post and leave. That's certainly a better experience for Mumsnetters which is mostly what we care about, but also I think a better strategy for the person/organisation posting - though obviously time consuming and sometimes uncomfortable.

JustineMumsnet · 22/03/2016 17:47

@Valentine2

Hey hey hold on a moment please! Whatever happened to the "disgrace" idea? Jeremy Corbyn, John McDonnell etc can use any manner of strong words to denounce the fiasco of a budget in PARLIAMENT! but I don't get to call a minister "disgrace" who posts something THIS serious here without evidence and just runs away ??? Don't try to take my voice away!

Valentine, no one's trying to make your voice go away - in fact I'd say your voice was very loud and clear! It's really not something we do to condemn policies and politicians of any ilk. Nor do we try to manipulate, shut down or give verdicts on conversations. Our job, as I see it, is to provide a platform for open and civil discussion. Mumsnetters can then draw their own conclusions.

JustineMumsnet · 22/03/2016 18:57

@Mner

Justine I don't understand why Mumsnet can't take a stand on a highly controversial proposal not backed up by evidence that could have a detrimental affect on so many of our children.

What about asking the shadow education secretary for a web chat or the ofsted chair. Or is there someone in the House of Lords we could talk to? Someone who would actually engage with us!

We ran this post at the same time as Nicky Morgan's one. But we can certainly ask an expert on to give their view - maybe as a webchat given there's so many specific questions been raised.

Watch this thread for updates

Tap "Watch" to get all the latest updates

End of posts

There are no more MNHQ posts on this thread