I am by some of the responses on this thread.
As far as I saw it, the op was using her friend as reference, so that a discussion might be had on whether such amounts of alcohol constitutes a dependency in general, not because she was intending to encourage him in the direction of the nearest AA meeting.
I think a bottle of wine a night is excessive. I also think that just because you say you?re not dependent on alcohol, doesn?t mean you?re not. Remember one of the major symptoms of alcoholism is denial. Alcoholics rarely admit to having a drink problem until they come to the realization that they have a drink problem and seak help for it. Also, you don?t have to drink all day and all night to be an alcoholic, that?s another of the major misconceptions about alcoholism. So you can still be sobour for 2/3 days of the week and go out binge drinking every Friday and Saturday night and could still have a problem with alcohol.
As a non drinker I have always been bothered by just how normal drinking is considered to be, and how it is actually considered less normal not to drink than to drink.
I am predominantly te-total. Not because of any moral objections to alcohol, but because I just don?t like the taste. Beer, wine, all ghastly imo, unless you drown it in gallons of lemonade, in which case what is the point? But try going out with a group of friends and ordering a coke while everyone else is ordering alcohol. ?oh you can?t have a good time if you don?t have a drink? is a comment I?ve heard regularly. Or ?we?ll have to spike your drink one day to get you drunk? was something I also experienced when I was younger. Not drinking is like being an outcast. In the opinion of a lot of people you should only not drink if you?re driving, otherwise there must be something wrong with you.
So I think this normalizing of the need for alcohol is something that needs to be looked at before we can do something about it.