@EachandEveryone
Did he say it 'WILL' cause or 'COULD' cause those awful side effects? The list of possible side effects from our cancer treatments are downright horrific.
My list of possible side effects from radiotherapy was equally appalling although different to yours (heart, lung etc rather than the areas of the body you mentioned). My radiologist said I am high risk due to my other medical conditions such as hypertension, asthma and others (I had blood pressure crisis and now hard to control BP, asthma, etc )
Chemo worked well for me too, and the oncologist told me it meant my prognosis had changed from poor to good. That was without the radiotherapy because I don't think they can check the effect that has (?) I could be wrong but they don't seem to be checking my body post radio.
I wasn't offered a mild vs full blast, just told 15 sessions and on which areas - it was on about 5 areas.
I find it rather unfair of him to ask the patient to choose, I mean we haven't been to uni to study medicine or further specialisms for all those years have we. We do need autonomy, but that is going too far I think. I wasn't asked what I thought, just given it, although the radiologist did say to me that my treatments are so new they don't have sufficient data yet to know whether I need 15 sessions or how many or if any make a difference...
I went ahead with the 15 sessions of radio and so far, have found it fine. I mean in comparison to chemo it was really nothing. Who knows what is going on inside me though and if there will be delayed effects.
Good luck with your decision. Can you get a 2nd opinion from a doctor?
You are not alone xxxxxx