Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

General election 2024

If you're an undecided voter, what are the issues that are stopping you from deciding?

378 replies

tomatoesatbreakfast · 13/06/2024 08:03

As an 'undecided voter', I was watching the Sky News interviews last night and felt myself warming more toward KS. When he started talking honestly about the possible impact on his kids...he suddenly seemed really human, a dad who wanted to pursue this opportunity but wanted to protect his children from the worst of it. However, I'm still undecided.

My politics are usually centre/middle and over the years I've voted Tory and Labour...basically whichever party I felt most aligned with my values.

All I know for sure is that I don't want more of the same and while I am definitely warming to Labour (as well as my local candidate who seems nice) I'm not keen on some others within the party.

I worry that by voting in the seemingly nice people, that it's a door opened to something I can't get on board with. You could equally say the same of the Tories though!!

So I'm wondering if there's any other 'undecided voters' out there (from any side of politics) and what are the issues/policies that are preventing you from being able to make a decision?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
12
GameOfJones · 02/07/2024 13:22

MissScarletInTheBallroom · 02/07/2024 12:44

But not on the same issues.

The position I am in is that the Tories are going closest to where I want to go on gender issues (but not necessarily women's rights in general), whereas Labour are going closest to where I want to go in other policy areas but firmly heading to somewhere I absolutely do not want to go on gender issues and that is a red line for me.

This is why I'm voting Social Democratic Party. They know what a woman is but are still left leaning.

MissScarletInTheBallroom · 02/07/2024 14:28

GameOfJones · 02/07/2024 13:22

This is why I'm voting Social Democratic Party. They know what a woman is but are still left leaning.

I didn't have that option so I spoiled my ballot.

5475878237NC · 02/07/2024 16:27

I didn't have the option either so am going for the Party of Women as a protest vote.

DoNotScrapeMyDataBishes · 03/07/2024 15:18

I'm a natural Lib Dem leaner but I live in a Tory/Lab marginal. Haven't decided yet if I'm voting tactically for Labour (despite the fact I can't stand Starmer - or the local candidate who's a bit of an arrogant prat) or voting with my heart for the Lib Dems.

visionahead · 03/07/2024 17:44

There have been some awful CP leaders and serious lapses in judgement but to be fair, the current Gov have been dealt one of the worst hands in history and took over from a very low point (after the last Labour run):

  1. Prolonged recession 2008-2013 (much of this coincided with a Labour gov), did not bounce back from until around 2016
  2. European debt crisis (Gordon Brown was disastrous selling off gold reserves, flooding the commodity market then having to buy back at huge losses, billions; same again with buying Euros, costing billions, lost our reserves and credit rating!)
  3. Brexit - Cameron as PM was a remainer and urged people to vote for Remain (tbh it was old Farage that campaigned for Brexit calling Cameron's hand and forcing a referendum in which people were stupid enough to vote Brexit)
  4. Covid (once in a century)
  5. Russia/Ukraine
  6. Israel/Palestine

For what it's worth, even though with little charisma, Rishi strikes me as principled, hard working and decent. He promised inflation would be down and has delivered. Don't agree with Rwanda or his Brexit stance but I think he's got a good brain on him but needs to look through the ranks and make some better people selections.

As for national service - wish people would have a more global view: this is discussed in numerous European countries so it's something that is likely to be introduced by whoever gets into power.

DazedNotConfused1 · 03/07/2024 17:48

Conservative are out of the standing for me. I’m leaning towards labour to improve the economy and housing, but I do not like their policies on trans rights and women. Reform is another I am considering because of the effect immigration has had on housing, schools and public services in my area.

visionahead · 03/07/2024 17:58

DazedNotConfused1 · 03/07/2024 17:48

Conservative are out of the standing for me. I’m leaning towards labour to improve the economy and housing, but I do not like their policies on trans rights and women. Reform is another I am considering because of the effect immigration has had on housing, schools and public services in my area.

Farage was behind Brexit, which has led to a huge influx of immigration. Not from the EU, but from non-EU countries. This has risen by 80%! Non-EU migration surged to 685,000 a record. Due to Brexit!!!

So whoever voted Brexit have themselves to blame really.

And Brexit destabilised Europe and made Putin bold enough to attack Ukraine. Economists predicted this would happen. So Farage is a fool for blaming Europe/Western world and NATO etc when he was an instigator of Brexit which set this in motion.

Crossingsout · 03/07/2024 19:19

DoNotScrapeMyDataBishes · 03/07/2024 15:18

I'm a natural Lib Dem leaner but I live in a Tory/Lab marginal. Haven't decided yet if I'm voting tactically for Labour (despite the fact I can't stand Starmer - or the local candidate who's a bit of an arrogant prat) or voting with my heart for the Lib Dems.

Interesting. I have always voted Lib Dem (and campaigned for them) but am only voting for them now to get the Tories out. I wouldn't want them in power.I think they have lost the plot.

Clavinova · 03/07/2024 20:14

visionahead
Brexit destabilised Europe and made Putin bold enough to attack Ukraine

More likely to be Joe Biden's show of weakness than anything to do with Brexit:

May 2021
WASHINGTON — The Biden administration has decided to waive sanctions against the company overseeing the construction of Russia's Nord Stream 2 gas pipeline to Germany, despite bipartisan opposition in Congress and appeals from Eastern European governments.

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/national-security/biden-comes-under-fire-congress-after-waiving-sanctions-russian-gas-n1267975

August 2021
Biden's Afghanistan disaster
https://www.washingtoninstitute.org/policy-analysis/how-russia-stands-gain-thanks-bidens-afghanistan-disaster

visionahead · 04/07/2024 07:34

Clavinova · 03/07/2024 20:14

visionahead
Brexit destabilised Europe and made Putin bold enough to attack Ukraine

More likely to be Joe Biden's show of weakness than anything to do with Brexit:

May 2021
WASHINGTON — The Biden administration has decided to waive sanctions against the company overseeing the construction of Russia's Nord Stream 2 gas pipeline to Germany, despite bipartisan opposition in Congress and appeals from Eastern European governments.

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/national-security/biden-comes-under-fire-congress-after-waiving-sanctions-russian-gas-n1267975

August 2021
Biden's Afghanistan disaster
https://www.washingtoninstitute.org/policy-analysis/how-russia-stands-gain-thanks-bidens-afghanistan-disaster

Actually, I understand that Putin planned the Ukraine attack before this, even as early as Feb 2021. A weakened Europe, and all the discussions in other European countries about leaving the EU after the UK Brexit contributed. It was one factor out of several, but a significant one.

So people should bear that in mind if they want to vote for a racist, misogynistic party lead by Farage.

Clavinova · 04/07/2024 10:06

visionahead
Actually, I understand that Putin planned the Ukraine attack before this, even as early as Feb 2021

Joe Biden took office 20 January 2021.

So people should bear that in mind if they want to vote for a racist, misogynistic party lead by Farage.

I have no intention of voting Reform myself (I'm a Conservative voter) but I have to ask the question, why Keir Starmer and others were happy to see Seumas Milne appointed as the Labour Party's Executive Director of Strategy and Communications 2015 - 2020 -

The clash in Crimea is the fruit of western expansion - Seumas Milne
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/mar/05/clash-crimea-western-expansion-ukraine-fascists

Far from keeping the peace, Nato is a threat to it
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/sep/03/nato-peace-threat-ukraine-military-conflict
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3298550/Red-handed-Photograph-shows-Jeremy-Corbyn-s-pro-Kremlin-spin-chief-held-Putin-s-iron-grip-propaganda-summit.html

Jeremy Corbyn's pro-Kremlin spin chief held in Putin's iron grip

Jeremy Corbyn's aide Seumas Milne was pictured shaking hands with the Russian president Vladimir Putin at last year's Sochi summit, which is designed to boost Putin's ego.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3298550/Red-handed-Photograph-shows-Jeremy-Corbyn-s-pro-Kremlin-spin-chief-held-Putin-s-iron-grip-propaganda-summit.html

WhitegreeNcandle · 04/07/2024 10:29

Mycatsmudge · 27/06/2024 09:14

Labour’s main growth plan to create 600,000 jobs and fund their spending pledges from Green energy, pursuing net zero and decarbonisation is currently fantasy. Even if the wind is blowing in the right direction we still have no viable means of storing enough of the energy for it to be secure ,reliable and affordable. Paul Nowak in the video cites Biden increasing public spending to create more jobs but the numbers have been very small compared to the amount of money spent. Also the US economy’s growth has been due to the fact they have invested in technology which have secured their own energy sources in oil and gas extraction. This has been a priority for the US ever since 9/11 to be self sufficient in energy.

Renewable energy sources are no answer at all until intermittency has been solved. It hasn't yet - and the solution may be a long time coming (because people have been looking for energy efficient storage at scale for a long time now - and not finding it).
Even nuclear reactors are not a perfect answer because of the expense of construction and the time lag between conception and function - but also because they cannot simply be turned on and off (up and down a bit, yes, drastically, no). So it is likely still to be down to fossil fuels to cover large spikes in energy usage.

No one has grasped the nettle of net zero - which implies a massive upgrade both in generation and in the grid to support it (which is simply not up to it currently). It isn't just productivity that is at stake - it's keeping the lights on as interminable net zero policies put more and more pressure on the grid.
I don't think that any policy maker has a grip on this at all. Because, if they had, they'd be panicking.

We need to continue to develop green technology and energy sources but not rush it in before it’s secure, reliable and affordable. We should phase it in alongside current oil and gas if we don’t want to shoot ourselves in the foot. I recently had to spend £20,000 to replace my perfectly good diesel car because it was not ULEZ compliant. This has wiped out all of my savings but with unsocial hours shift work, children who do sporting activities and elderly infirm parents to ferry around to hospital appointment etc there really wasn’t much choice. One thing all governments need are more scientists as MPs, advisors and SPADS because the current lack of understanding of basic science in energy creation and storage and also medicine during the Covid era is just plain embarrassing and leads to policies is at best Expensive and unworkable and at worst dangerous and harmful.

This is so true.

we put in an application to the grid to have a 250kw solar panel system. It would be amazing for the environment and a great use of our land as the livestock we have can still graze under them meaning a double use of land and no taking good land out of production.

However, we were told we could have it but couldn’t export between 11am and 6pm every day as there is already too much green electric being produced in the area.

WhitegreeNcandle · 04/07/2024 10:32

I’ve just done that vote for policies thing online and it was fascinating. I came out Lib Deb closely followed by Reform, then Green.

Before doing that I would have said my head was Tory, my hear Labour!!

wonderwhattodaywillbring · 04/07/2024 17:34

visionahead · 04/07/2024 07:34

Actually, I understand that Putin planned the Ukraine attack before this, even as early as Feb 2021. A weakened Europe, and all the discussions in other European countries about leaving the EU after the UK Brexit contributed. It was one factor out of several, but a significant one.

So people should bear that in mind if they want to vote for a racist, misogynistic party lead by Farage.

What happened in 2022 goes back to what happened in 2014, and before - multi level.

In relation to national service, your earlier post, this is being discussed in many European countries, but people in many EU countries are against it, and there have been demonstrations on the continent both against escalating Ukraine and also about the fact that 2 percent going into NATO is being taken away from education, housing, etc. Are you saying that anyone who gets into power are going to have pressure put on them to keeping spending money on military and pushing for war? Or that anyone getting into power should simply follow the majority?

DBD1975 · 07/07/2024 09:41

Sir Kier has already scrapped the Rwanda plan, reached out to junior doctors to start negotiations, brought Sir Patrick Valance back in to the fold, appointed the owner of Timpsons as minister of prisons (and there is a man who knows what he is talking about). Held a press conference where he talked sense and I for one am glad to have the 'grown ups' back in charge of the country.

It obviously depends on your viewpoint and what matters to you personally but, for me, 48 hours post coming in to office Sir Kier is already doing the right thing in changing the direction of this country, he is a thoroughly decent, professional public servant and not a career politician out to serve his own personal ambitions

This country made the right choice in voting in a Labour government and I am looking forward to seeing the positive changes which will be coming further down the line.

WindsurfingDreams · 07/07/2024 09:45

DBD1975 · 07/07/2024 09:41

Sir Kier has already scrapped the Rwanda plan, reached out to junior doctors to start negotiations, brought Sir Patrick Valance back in to the fold, appointed the owner of Timpsons as minister of prisons (and there is a man who knows what he is talking about). Held a press conference where he talked sense and I for one am glad to have the 'grown ups' back in charge of the country.

It obviously depends on your viewpoint and what matters to you personally but, for me, 48 hours post coming in to office Sir Kier is already doing the right thing in changing the direction of this country, he is a thoroughly decent, professional public servant and not a career politician out to serve his own personal ambitions

This country made the right choice in voting in a Labour government and I am looking forward to seeing the positive changes which will be coming further down the line.

Agreed. I have no particular party affiliation but yes , that sense that "the grown ups are in charge again" is exactly how it feels.

Mytholmroyd · 07/07/2024 15:20

Yes he's making a lot of the right noises - I am cautiously hopeful and delighted that the cabinet is mostly state educated. And some of his appointments look inspired - I really hope people with experience and knowledge are going to be making the decisions. Although a little concerned about David Lammy as foreign secretary (he seems a little hot headed) and Lisa Nandy

twistyizzy · 07/07/2024 18:07

Mytholmroyd · 07/07/2024 15:20

Yes he's making a lot of the right noises - I am cautiously hopeful and delighted that the cabinet is mostly state educated. And some of his appointments look inspired - I really hope people with experience and knowledge are going to be making the decisions. Although a little concerned about David Lammy as foreign secretary (he seems a little hot headed) and Lisa Nandy

State educated but a lot are Oxford alumni and remember state educated also includes grammars.

cardibach · 07/07/2024 19:03

twistyizzy · 07/07/2024 18:07

State educated but a lot are Oxford alumni and remember state educated also includes grammars.

They aren’t from grammar schools. Someone else said that elsewhere. Even if they were though, what’s the difference? State education. And why shouldn’t people from state schools go to Oxbridge? They get there on merit, without the inherent advantages of wealth and private education. It’s brilliant if they are that clever, surely?

twistyizzy · 07/07/2024 19:07

cardibach · 07/07/2024 19:03

They aren’t from grammar schools. Someone else said that elsewhere. Even if they were though, what’s the difference? State education. And why shouldn’t people from state schools go to Oxbridge? They get there on merit, without the inherent advantages of wealth and private education. It’s brilliant if they are that clever, surely?

Absolute no reason but they are being disingenuous linking only indi schools to privilege and politics. Oxford alumi have more opportunities just by being Ofxord alumni, which is the same things they vilify private schools for.
Trying to be "oh I'm so normal and WC" whilst shopimg at Harrods and coming from Oxford. It is hypocritical. 1 rule for Labour and another for the rest of us.

cardibach · 07/07/2024 19:35

twistyizzy · 07/07/2024 19:07

Absolute no reason but they are being disingenuous linking only indi schools to privilege and politics. Oxford alumi have more opportunities just by being Ofxord alumni, which is the same things they vilify private schools for.
Trying to be "oh I'm so normal and WC" whilst shopimg at Harrods and coming from Oxford. It is hypocritical. 1 rule for Labour and another for the rest of us.

But the cabinet members with Oxbridge advantage earned that advantage. Can’t you see the difference?

BIossomtoes · 07/07/2024 19:43

twistyizzy · 07/07/2024 19:07

Absolute no reason but they are being disingenuous linking only indi schools to privilege and politics. Oxford alumi have more opportunities just by being Ofxord alumni, which is the same things they vilify private schools for.
Trying to be "oh I'm so normal and WC" whilst shopimg at Harrods and coming from Oxford. It is hypocritical. 1 rule for Labour and another for the rest of us.

You can’t buy an Oxford place.

twistyizzy · 07/07/2024 19:48

cardibach · 07/07/2024 19:35

But the cabinet members with Oxbridge advantage earned that advantage. Can’t you see the difference?

So you are saying that no child from an indi school has ever got anything on merit?

twistyizzy · 07/07/2024 19:49

BIossomtoes · 07/07/2024 19:43

You can’t buy an Oxford place.

Many kids don't buy a place at indi school either due to scholarships and bursaries

Seymour5 · 07/07/2024 20:09

cardibach · 07/07/2024 19:35

But the cabinet members with Oxbridge advantage earned that advantage. Can’t you see the difference?

Of course. But then their children will be privileged. That’s how it works. One or two (or more) generations do well, build up their assets, and bingo! Inherited wealth.

Swipe left for the next trending thread