Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

General election 2024

Rishi thinks we've turned a corner. Does it feel like we have

147 replies

Justkeepswiimming · 10/06/2024 20:11

Rishi keeps saying we've turned a corner, but does it really feel like we have. Do people feel better off, or less worse off.

A case in point from my very small world view. I know a mum of a 4 month old and a 3 yo who has today lost her home. The rent was put up from £600 pcm to £875. She's had to move in with her parents until temporary accommodation becomes available.

Housing is just one of the things that absolutely do not feel lime they are improving and have only got much worse under 14 years of the conservatives. So how can we trust that the next 5 years will be any better.

He's talking the words he thinks we want to hear, but why not have delivered it before if that's what they could do?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
5
LumiB · 11/06/2024 12:23

LuluBlakey1 · 11/06/2024 10:38

It is caused by greed for money - same as the behaviour if energy and water-companies. The government has encouraged it. They set a tone and allow all kinds of appalling service to be provided - they can up the powers of ombudsmen and make it clear the kind of consequences they expect. They can limit price rises- as the Wilson government did. The tone this government have set for 14 years is making rich people richer, asset-stripping, huge dividends to shareholders and massive salaries to CEOs.

They need to do more for the most vulnerable. They can tax them more and invest the money in better public services. They can limit things like the amount of properties anyone can own - to say 2 so that ordinary people can stand a chance of buying houses where they live. They can give councils money to build social housing that can not be bought and remains as decent quality social housing. They can raise pensions- reducing NI and stamp duty for first -time buyers does not in anyway help pensioners- many of whom still live in poor conditions. They still pay tax but do not benefit from NI cuts- infact, along with children, disabled people, and the chronically sick they are very adversely affected by these.

I don't see elaborate agreeing to increase the tax free threshold so pensioners aren't taxed on their syaye pension....

Alot of what you want is more socialist values which is more labour and the conservative values are more about less state intervention

bombastix · 11/06/2024 12:27

The Conservatives are failures in their own terms; I never expect them to deliver good public service. They never have. The quid pro quo is that I pay a lot less tax. But what I have now is high tax and terrible services.

All Labour threaten to do is use some of my tax for better public services. That is fine.

frankentall · 11/06/2024 12:36

LumiB · 11/06/2024 12:23

I don't see elaborate agreeing to increase the tax free threshold so pensioners aren't taxed on their syaye pension....

Alot of what you want is more socialist values which is more labour and the conservative values are more about less state intervention

Not quite sure what that typo is supposed to be saying, but it's a hollow laugh from me if the Conservatives are now trying to claim credit for reintroducing age-related personal tax allowances which they removed. Like many of their empty promises for this election - if it's such a great idae why haven't they done it in the 14 years they have had?

RoobarbAndMustard · 11/06/2024 12:46

The Tories have turned a corner on the road to nowhere.

pointythings · 11/06/2024 12:52

Meetingofminds · 11/06/2024 12:11

It’s likely to be a hung parliament.

Want to place a bet with the bookies on that? You'll get fabulous odds. Because it isn't.

DistinguishedSocialCommentator · 11/06/2024 12:57

Shinyandnew1 · 11/06/2024 12:15

What evidence have you based that on?

Not sure if this was a rhetorical question but it based on the fact that no one really knows who will win until the vast majority or all votes have been counted

feel free to disagree as you will as it does not suit your agenda but come 5th July, it will either be the Tories in number 10 or Labour slipping through the back door with a coalition partner. Either way, its not great for England and much worse if labour and Co get the chance to run England into the ground

Every time labour has been in office and the last time was 15 years ago, labour has historically left number ten with a higher unemployment rate than they first dropped in

1dayatatime · 11/06/2024 12:57

@bombastix

"But what I have now is high tax and terrible services.

All Labour threaten to do is use some of my tax for better public services. That is fine."

Unless of course under Labour you have much more higher taxes and no better services.

This is not a criticism of Labour but just a recognition that when they win things are not going to be that different. Except higher taxes.

Euromonkey · 11/06/2024 13:13

@1dayatatime i just don’t think that’s true, Labour didn’t get everything right last time (as no government does) but one thing they did improve was the NHS - introducing targets for being seen & treatment worked. I was starting a family when Labour were in, everyone got child trust funds to start savings for them, a health in pregnancy grant, children’s centres running free activities, child benefit was universal. The circumstances for average people were just better.

Some of the things Rishi is now throwing out do appeal e.g sorting out the inequality in child benefit threshold. Some things don’t e.g. national service.

The key for me is that I don’t believe the Tories. They’ve had 10 years to sort out the unfair child benefit system (that they created) but haven’t, so why now? The lies and corruption (cronies health contracts) during Covid really were the final straw. So they might be pledging all sorts but why should anyone believe them?

Marshmallowbrain · 11/06/2024 13:13

Considering the cheese at my local Tesco has a security tag on it, I don't bloody think so 😂

pointythings · 11/06/2024 13:15

Of course getting in via a coalition would be completely legitimate and not at all a matter of 'slipping in by the back door', unless you were someone who didn't believe in British democracy.

The bookies have an excellent track record of being right about election outcomes.

And no, there's no miracles expected from Labour- but at least we can have a steady hand, grown up and serious government and gradual improvement.

IClaudine · 11/06/2024 13:23

Meetingofminds · 11/06/2024 12:11

It’s likely to be a hung parliament.

😭😭😭

Put a bet on that, go on!

frankentall · 11/06/2024 13:23

That daft load of bollocks mantra about 'slipping in by the back door' is hilarious. He must be doing it for a bet.

IClaudine · 11/06/2024 13:26

it will either be the Tories in number 10 or Labour slipping through the back door with a coalition partner

One of the many good things about July 5th is that DSC will stop trotting out this rubbish.

Anonym00se · 11/06/2024 13:28

DistinguishedSocialCommentator · 11/06/2024 09:09

Heard on the radio this morning that Labour has historically always left number 10 with a higher unemployment rate than when they came in = fact!!!

That’s because Labour don’t massage the figures like this lot. The Tories force people into work, even though for many that means 6 hours a week on a zero hour contract, and then they say that they’re “employed”. It’s all bollocks. They won’t be honest about the numbers of under-employed people either.

frankentall · 11/06/2024 13:29

IClaudine · 11/06/2024 13:26

it will either be the Tories in number 10 or Labour slipping through the back door with a coalition partner

One of the many good things about July 5th is that DSC will stop trotting out this rubbish.

I sincerely fucking hope so; it's such a load of shite.

DistinguishedSocialCommentator · 11/06/2024 13:29

Anonym00se · 11/06/2024 13:28

That’s because Labour don’t massage the figures like this lot. The Tories force people into work, even though for many that means 6 hours a week on a zero hour contract, and then they say that they’re “employed”. It’s all bollocks. They won’t be honest about the numbers of under-employed people either.

Serioulsyl!!
😂

IClaudine · 11/06/2024 13:29

Also, DSC doesn't even seem to understand how the UK is governed. Although I suspect that is deliberate along with the typos that they forget to make at times.

frankentall · 11/06/2024 13:29

IClaudine · 11/06/2024 13:29

Also, DSC doesn't even seem to understand how the UK is governed. Although I suspect that is deliberate along with the typos that they forget to make at times.

100% deliberate - no-one is that dim in reality.

user1984778379202 · 11/06/2024 13:39

Marshmallowbrain · 11/06/2024 13:13

Considering the cheese at my local Tesco has a security tag on it, I don't bloody think so 😂

Exactly this. ^

There is no corner the Tories could turn now to convince me they deserve to stay in power. Public services in this country are on their knees. Labour might not have the answers and they clearly won't have the necessary budget, but I truly believe they want to make things better, whereas the Tories just want to line their own pockets (and their friends') and boost their personal profiles to secure their post-Parliament employment prospects. They have made this nation as inward looking as they are.

BastardisMendacem · 11/06/2024 13:41

I don't see elaborate agreeing to increase the tax free threshold so pensioners aren't taxed on their state pension....

Pensioners aren't taxed on their state pension. In the hypothetical future world where they might be it will take a £2000pa uplift on their pension (compared to today) for them to pay the princely sum of £15pa. And that's likely to take at least 2 years to get to that point (so, 2026).

Now, I think it's a bit daft to spend admin resources giving the money with one hand to then spend admin resources to take it back with another but cannot see how £1.25 out of £1125 per month is going to make a difference to anyone.

My guess would be that there will be pressure by then to uplift the personal allowance for everyone as it will have been frozen for 7 years by that point, despite high inflation in that period (making it a significant cut for workers in real terms). So, even if it happens, it's likely only to be for a year or so while the allowance freeze for workers comes to an end (2028).

Anonym00se · 11/06/2024 13:55

DistinguishedSocialCommentator · 11/06/2024 13:29

Serioulsyl!!
😂

Yes. The number of unemployed is 4.9 million. The number of underemployed (people who don’t get enough hours to live on and want more hours) is over 7 million. The number of people on zero hours contracts has gone up 500%(!!!!) since 2010. They’re just splitting one job between numerous people and hey presto, that’s five people who are no longer “unemployed”. The reality is they might as well be.

Churchview · 11/06/2024 13:56

DistinguishedSocialCommentator · 11/06/2024 09:09

Heard on the radio this morning that Labour has historically always left number 10 with a higher unemployment rate than when they came in = fact!!!

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c2881jmwjlmo

A woman with tattooed arms and neck working in a coffee shop

UK unemployment rate highest for more than two years

The rate has risen to 4.4%, official figures show, the highest figure since September 2021.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c2881jmwjlmo

Churchview · 11/06/2024 14:04

frankentall · 11/06/2024 13:29

I sincerely fucking hope so; it's such a load of shite.

There's so much to like on these threads, but the moment I always look forward to most is when @frankentall finally cracks and says what we're all thinking in the most eloquent and appropriate way. Hat's off to you - never change.

DistinguishedSocialCommentator · 11/06/2024 14:18

Anonym00se · 11/06/2024 13:55

Yes. The number of unemployed is 4.9 million. The number of underemployed (people who don’t get enough hours to live on and want more hours) is over 7 million. The number of people on zero hours contracts has gone up 500%(!!!!) since 2010. They’re just splitting one job between numerous people and hey presto, that’s five people who are no longer “unemployed”. The reality is they might as well be.

"underemployed"😂

The fact remains that labour has historically come in to office with a low unemployment number and left the the country truly f'd up with a higher unemployment rate and that by dear is just another fact!!

Churchview · 11/06/2024 14:41

Some insights here into unemployment rates .https://www.economicshelp.org/blog/6744/unemployment/the-uk-unemployment-mystery/

Particularly interesting are the high levels of unemployment during the Thatcher years compared to the Blair years (employment was at its highest level recorded at the time during some of the Blair years) I left school in the early 80s and remember the appalling youth unemployment during Thatcher's time in power.

The article also shows the four fold growth of zero hours contracts during the last 15 Tory years.

Very telling that whilst the Tories would have us believe unemployment is up, productivity is down AND the BBC are reporting today that unemployment is at a two year high. If we've turned a corner it's down.

unemployment-total-uk

Reasons for falling UK unemployment - Economics Help

Why did UK unemployment fall so sharply - despite weak economic growth? An evaluation of factors, such flexible labour markets, weak wage growth, poor productivity and zero hour contracts

https://www.economicshelp.org/blog/6744/unemployment/the-uk-unemployment-mystery

Swipe left for the next trending thread