Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

General election 2024

National Service if Tories are re-elected

1000 replies

MaryMaryVeryContrary · 25/05/2024 22:13

Thoughts? 🍿 Grin

OP posts:
Thread gallery
19
GuinnessBird · 26/05/2024 12:52

ThatWarmSquid · 26/05/2024 12:42

For young women as well as young men? I couldn’t see on the guardian whether this was aimed at both sexes.
I think this would be the making of many young males (regardless of how they identify!) and I could see it being very beneficial for society, but I don’t support this for young women. Of course they should have the option to join military, as young women do now, but it shouldn’t be compulsory for the same way it would be for men. It’s dangerous to pretend there isn’t a difference between the two sexes in regards to physical ability, men failing at sports can take women’s top places. Women are more likely to be assaulted physically and sexually. If he is intending this for both sexes, it’s very worrisome and shows how out of touch he is. General consensus in my circles is he is la-la land! Can 100% understand the logic behind the benefits if for young men though.

Are you feeling okay?

ArnottL · 26/05/2024 12:55

Blair sent everyone to universities, now Rishi is sending everyone to the Army. Let us wait and see and then offer a well-balanced, fact-based opinion, OK?

bluetopazlove · 26/05/2024 12:55

ManchesterLu · 26/05/2024 12:24

I don't agree with national service, however volunteering for an hour a week is something that would benefit young people, and should be made compulsory as a part of school life. Even if it's volunteering somewhere in the school, helping out with a younger class, whatever. Young people today need to learn what it means to give back instead of just taking.

I don't like where this is talked about just as a thing only young people should do where we know some adults wouldn't give it a second thought , or not their problem .It definitely give some adults a thing or two to think about .

GivePeaceAChance · 26/05/2024 12:55

cakeorwine · 25/05/2024 22:38

It said 18-year-olds would have a choice of either joining the military full-time, or volunteering one weekend every month carrying out a community service.
The party is proposing a Royal Commission to consider the details but would plan for the first teenagers to take part in September 2025.
The cost is expected to be around £2.5bn per year.
Under the plans, young people could choose a full-time, 12-month placement in the armed forces or UK cyber defence, learning about logistics, cyber security, procurement or civil response operations.
Their other option would be to volunteer one weekend per month - or 25 days per year - in their community with organisations such as fire, police and the NHS.

Conservatives plan to bring back mandatory National Service - BBC News

What if an 18 year old is studying?
Going to uni and needs to study?
Has a weekend job
Doesn't want to.

The BBC article states for those not in education.
I assume, no clarification though, that it means not those attending University or FE

StripedPiggy · 26/05/2024 12:56

Coming to a manifesto near you, in the next month:
bring back hanging

Assuming the Tories lose this election, and lose it badly, it is very likely that they will reinvent themselves as a Trump / Orban style right wing populist party, possibly with Farage as leader. In that case, I wouldn’t be at all surprised if the return of capital punishment was one of their policies.

upthehills1 · 26/05/2024 12:57

It sounds like an expensive, administrative nightmare that would never be implemented effectively. It would cost the country a lot of money for nothing. Exactly which organisations want to support 18 year olds in the workplace, for one weekend per month, who don't want to be there?

Do the armed forces really want to spend their budget on training a bunch of teenagers who are going to leave before they are useful in any way? What nonsense.

I also don't believe that anyone should be forced to work for free. That's slavery. It's not 'voluntary' if it's forced.

BloodyHellKenAgain · 26/05/2024 12:58

HotApplePiePunch · 26/05/2024 12:48

I was pointing out that if you do army option they are already saying they will recall as necessary.

So if you do army option you can be recalled at whim of politicians for currently unspecified number of years. So even if you've just taken out a mortgage expecting kids doesn't matter some future politician can recall you - not peers who did 25 days option but you and they aren't saying what criteria would be used - they are already saying it's a benefit to the idea.

This is not the same as conscription when country is facing invasion - this is an additional burden for one who choose the military option which at 18 - which then hang over then and not their peers.

You may think this is a great idea - all I said having heard this being stated already as a benefit I'm even more reluctant for my teens in this age group even conciser that as an option - because I don't what that extra burden to bite them in the arse in future years.

We've had very little support elder family members, community or last 14 years of government to raise our kids - they already volunteering , working and study facing a economic landscape that the most adverse for generations. If you think me looking out for my kids is patronising - well fuck you and yours and hope some of the crap my families dealt with last 14 hits you and yours next - because I'm fucking done.

After reading your first 2 paragraphs I was going to reply that I saw your point.

But after continuing to read where you assumded I think its a great idea and then became personally abusive and wished ill on my family then you can sod right off.

GivePeaceAChance · 26/05/2024 12:58

ManchesterLu · 26/05/2024 12:24

I don't agree with national service, however volunteering for an hour a week is something that would benefit young people, and should be made compulsory as a part of school life. Even if it's volunteering somewhere in the school, helping out with a younger class, whatever. Young people today need to learn what it means to give back instead of just taking.

I agree at school level it’s a good thing.
Some schools ( Indis mainly I think ) do ccf and volunteering. Ours did both. The volunteering was just as you say, at local schools for an afternoon a week.

LadyMary50 · 26/05/2024 12:59

GiantTagliatelle · 25/05/2024 22:36

The conservatives are utterly fucking dead to me now.

What did the 18 year olds do to deserve this?? And if an option is a weekend a month doing voluntary service then the whole fucking adult population should do it.

Including the boomers this is supposed to appeal to. Hell - why not send them to do a year in the armed forces? They’ve had a good life already?

I actually think Rishi is trying as desperately hard as he possibly can to lose this election. What an utter cnt.

Ive name changed for this.

How dare you,I’m a boomer and I’ve worked f**king hard all my adult life.No I don’t agree with National Service.I’m am sick to death of the boomer insult being pulled out by people with a lack of vocabulary..

upthehills1 · 26/05/2024 12:59

GivePeaceAChance · 26/05/2024 12:55

The BBC article states for those not in education.
I assume, no clarification though, that it means not those attending University or FE

Ah. I assume they aren't exempt if they are working? Or that would only leave those unemployed.

So the benefit is supposedly to give 'work experience' to young people. But it's for those who go into the workplace rather than education? Yep that makes sense.

GivePeaceAChance · 26/05/2024 13:01

ThatWarmSquid · 26/05/2024 12:42

For young women as well as young men? I couldn’t see on the guardian whether this was aimed at both sexes.
I think this would be the making of many young males (regardless of how they identify!) and I could see it being very beneficial for society, but I don’t support this for young women. Of course they should have the option to join military, as young women do now, but it shouldn’t be compulsory for the same way it would be for men. It’s dangerous to pretend there isn’t a difference between the two sexes in regards to physical ability, men failing at sports can take women’s top places. Women are more likely to be assaulted physically and sexually. If he is intending this for both sexes, it’s very worrisome and shows how out of touch he is. General consensus in my circles is he is la-la land! Can 100% understand the logic behind the benefits if for young men though.

It’s for all young ‘people’ of 18yrs.
So yes both sexes.
Why wouldn’t it be.

Carly944 · 26/05/2024 13:02

It's true that the people that implement these things, never have to do them.

As the saying goes:

War is
Old men making decisions
and
Young men dying.

GivePeaceAChance · 26/05/2024 13:03

upthehills1 · 26/05/2024 12:59

Ah. I assume they aren't exempt if they are working? Or that would only leave those unemployed.

So the benefit is supposedly to give 'work experience' to young people. But it's for those who go into the workplace rather than education? Yep that makes sense.

I think that’s what’s being proposed as only education is mentioned as exempt.

Snippysocks · 26/05/2024 13:03

Paul2023 · 25/05/2024 22:43

As an ex forces guy, the military by and large wouldn’t want national service. Ultimately there would be too many people that wouldn’t want to be there and it wouldn’t work.
However, national service isn’t just about the military. But no, I don’t think it would
work in any sense.

Did the military want National Service before WW2? And I bet my back teeth that the kids around that time didn't want conscription, either. However, it did have its upsides. There were people who hated school and did badly there - but in the army it was discovered that they were talented at maths and / or had organisational skills that had never been identified before (family experience).

cardibach · 26/05/2024 13:06

GivePeaceAChance · 26/05/2024 13:03

I think that’s what’s being proposed as only education is mentioned as exempt.

I can’t see an education exemption anywhere is stuff directly from the Tory Party though. They are saying ‘all 18 year olds’.

GivePeaceAChance · 26/05/2024 13:06

Mostlycarbon · 26/05/2024 12:48

Desperately trying to claw back some votes from the right who may be tempted to vote Reform etc. Not a serious suggestion from a party expecting to stay in power.

This is what I thought.
with a recent poll of 60% against National Service I think it’s a nail in the coffin.

crumblingschools · 26/05/2024 13:07

My DF did NS (in the 50s I think). He loved it as learnt to fly! He was offered a place to stay on but declined as had other plans, but never lost his love of flying

Bloopereal · 26/05/2024 13:10

In re the young men/women discussion, there would need to be some way of protecting the young women. This has not been thought through. I should think we'd end up with a surge of teenage pregnancies too.

GivePeaceAChance · 26/05/2024 13:10

cardibach · 26/05/2024 13:06

I can’t see an education exemption anywhere is stuff directly from the Tory Party though. They are saying ‘all 18 year olds’.

Ok I read the bbc article.

Having had a look back it’s says more than just those not in education
See top paragraph from the bbc

National Service if Tories are re-elected
LadyMary50 · 26/05/2024 13:11

Penguinmouse · 25/05/2024 22:58

Anyone who suggests bringing back National service needs to do it themselves. It was abolished in 1963 so anyone under 79 didn’t do it so maybe let’s start with the first generation to miss out given they didn’t serve for the longest period of time. When are pensioners going to be doing their volunteering days?

Most pensioners I know already do volunteer work.Stop with the ageism it’s embarrassing.Go into any supermarket and you will see pensioners working the tills because they don’t have company pensions and have to work to top up their state pension.,

Carly944 · 26/05/2024 13:12

upthehills1 · 26/05/2024 12:57

It sounds like an expensive, administrative nightmare that would never be implemented effectively. It would cost the country a lot of money for nothing. Exactly which organisations want to support 18 year olds in the workplace, for one weekend per month, who don't want to be there?

Do the armed forces really want to spend their budget on training a bunch of teenagers who are going to leave before they are useful in any way? What nonsense.

I also don't believe that anyone should be forced to work for free. That's slavery. It's not 'voluntary' if it's forced.

Other countries manage to do it.

meisafairy · 26/05/2024 13:12

Yes!!! The current year 7s are feral! It will straighten them out 🤣

cardibach · 26/05/2024 13:12

GivePeaceAChance · 26/05/2024 13:10

Ok I read the bbc article.

Having had a look back it’s says more than just those not in education
See top paragraph from the bbc

That doesn’t say those in education etc would be exempt. It just says the benefits are mainly for those who aren’t.

GivePeaceAChance · 26/05/2024 13:12

GivePeaceAChance · 26/05/2024 13:03

I think that’s what’s being proposed as only education is mentioned as exempt.

Apologies not just education
see above extract from bbc

Notonthestairs · 26/05/2024 13:13

"Do the armed forces really want to spend their budget on training a bunch of teenagers who are going to leave before they are useful in any way? What nonsense. "

The MoD made a statement on Thursday stating that national service would be a waste of resources and damaging to morale.

National Service if Tories are re-elected
New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.