Runner It depends on how section F is worded. Whether you can take enforcement action is all down to the wording. Without actually knowing the exact wording I suspect the LA are trying it on.
Are the 17 hours tuition detailed, specified and quantified? What does it say will be covered by the tuition?
Obviously you might be paraphrasing on here but does section F really state “calming and anxiety reducing therapies/ strategies small group/ individual support for 5 hours a week” what therapies/strategies, by who, what is a small group?
Who is delivering the “organisation and planning skills”?
The OT should definitely be separate.
basically came down on side of LA as they say does she really need all her 17 hours tuition and they think it's not usual for LA to merge provision .
a) what the LA normally does is irrelevant, what is detailed, specified and quantified in F must be provided, and b) whether SENDIASS and the LA believe DD ‘needs’ 17 hours tuition is also irrelevant, SENDIST have judged DD “reasonably requires” 17 hours tuition (caveat being the 17 hours is detailed, specified and quantified). They don’t get to decide DD doesn’t need all the provision in F.
Personally I wouldn’t listen to a word of advice from your LA’s SENDIASS. IPSEA and SOSSEN are far better.
Don’t give up on the LGO. You don’t need to LA to respond to the complaint in order to go to the LGO. You probably just submitted too early as you should allow at least 12 weeks for a response to a complaint before going to the LGO and at the minute the LGO are preferring people give the LAs longer.
Muddling I am glad your DM is coping well. It is interesting you say it took a while to find the right dose of HRT. I trialed a few different types without any benefit, but perhaps I didn’t persevere long enough.
DS1 is asleep, thankfully.