@Talkinpeace
If the; Nepalis, Lebanese and Turkish restaurants are registered businesses whereby the employees are paying income tax and national insurance and the employers are paying National Insurance for their employees and corporate tax, who cares why they are there? If you watch the 5 December 2024 BBC episode of Question Time, both Nigel Farage and Alastair Campbell (former Labour MP) agreed that it only made sense for the UK to allow working immigrants into the country.
In the early 1960s, there were approximately 4 people working for every pensioner. However, due to a combination of an ageing population and declining birth rate, the ratio is now less than 3 persons working (Approx. 34 million) per pensioner (Approximately 13 million).
So, the UK will need more immigrations to fill jobs that can’t be filled by UK nationals as there won’t be enough of them in the future. The key is working, as opposed to non working, immigrants which will require control and monitoring, but at present is not happening.
Your definition, along with many others, seems to be:
Immigration control = reduction in total numbers + racism.
which is incorrect. For me it’s
Immigration control = entry shall only be allowed if the person has a job to fill or is of independent means so as never to make a claim against UK public funds.
For example, I have indefinite leave to remain visa for Bulgaria which has the caveat, no recourse to public funds. When I retire and wish to remain in Bulgaria more than the current 183 days per year, I will have to prove I have a guaranteed income which is at least the Bulgarian minimum wage.