*I think you might have misunderstood my post. Possibly a grammar fail on my part. I wrote that the EU having passed a law "automatically" makes it bad IMO in response to Peregrina who asked me
"Does this include a) those EU laws which were promoted by the UK when a Member state, or did it passing into EU law automatically make it bad?"
Basically my answer to this question was yes. I want as little legacy EU law to apply in the UK as possible.
I'd say the same even if a) said law is something the UK advocated for while an EU member state or b) a new law UK law would need to be made to have a similar effect.
I know b) costs Parliamentary time and money but I want EU law gone from UK statute books to the maximum extent permitted*
So. If I understand you correctly...
ANY and ALL EU laws including those proposed by the UK when still a member and even those greatly benefitting the UK and UK industries are inherently "bad" because they were made whilst we were a member? (For example the huge EU subsidies for our farmers and fishing industries)
Am I understanding?
And that it's worth spending tax payer money and time to simply replicate but remove the word "EU" from said statutes?
Is that right?