I think some Scots would welcome IndyRef2, and I am sure it will happen, but I wouldn't want to predict a date for it. An interesting op-ed comment/article in the last couple of days suggested that Nicola Sturgeon might not be as keen as her population after the count if Scotland voted for independence. At the moment, the SNP are free to blame the English, Boris and Westminster for everything, but assuming the SNP won (I think they would), then her party would have to fight subsequent elections on their record in government, and on health and education it's not wonderful, so she would soon be facing a resurgent Scottish Labour Party as well as a reinvigorated Ruth Davidson.
This leaves aside all the huge economic and financial questions that were asked but not answered during IndyRef1. Including, but not limited to, what currency would Scotland use? How hard would losing the Barnett Formula hit the provision of services, infrastructure and benefits? How much of this could be replaced by gaining control of oil and gas revenue, given the price fall and the shift to greener power? The North Sea is a costly place to extract oil. Would Scotland even be admitted to the EU given that they are not keen on admitting new non-contributors? IIRC, the article concluded along the lines of warning Scotland, the Scots, the SNP and Nicola Sturgeon to "be careful what you wish for".
Issues that require reasonable and nuanced consideration, but politics on MN generally start polarised and end in name-calling. I've got used to it; haven't changed name, and keep coming back, because I am an optimist... and I think these are important topics, on which all opinions deserve an airing.