Well, what can I say?
I went out and campaigned.
I don't think it's fair to hold those of us who had doubts about Corbyn's capacity to win the GE to blame for the defeat.
I honestly can't think of any more I could have done.
And, actually, I think that holds true for pretty much everyone on this thread.
As Red said earlier - this conversation only has value in so far as it yields tools for thinking about the present situation and how to move forwards.
So a little love and respect is needed.
No point at all in conjuring chimeras. No point in 'un-personing' and inventing 'others' to scapegoat and hate.
Let's bring on the complexity, the nuance - it's in short supply.
And I'll say now, my big take away from the GE was that populism always benefits the right.
Always.
So I'm not signing up for 'Left populism' any time soon. I, personally, will take some convincing that it's not a busted flush.
My other take-away: either/or politics is similarly disastrous for the progressives.
If I can do one thing, it will be to open space for something other than either/or politics.
I think there is something in the very nature of either/or politics that is authoritarian.
I've read my Mouffe and Laclau. They are optimistic for either/or politics. They see it as a neutral and necessary moment in all political projects. They therefore see it as something recuperable by progressives and the Left.
With respect to their obvious intellectual gifts, I now disagree.
I think either/or politics is always skewered towards authoritarians and cannot be used by progressives. It's poisonous for us.