^
Nonsense. I work in that industry in engineering and international trade, with those companies, the project (and the staff working on the design and manufacturing) is predominantly British.
Firstly, Galileo is not strictly speaking an "EU project", it's a project of the EU's GSA and ESA (The European Space Agency, which is nothing to do with the EU btw).
It also necessarily involves technical cooperation with the USA (due to yet another non-EU organisation, NATO, having an interest), and also China is involved and helps with funding (the project has had lots of funding problems over the years), as well as Switzerland, Norway, Israel, Ukraine, and Morocco. Hence, to describe it as an "EU project" or even a "European" project is misleading.
The EU trying to "exclude" Britain is a little bit "emporer's new clothes".
The technical capabilities and capacity for the parts of the project Britain is involved in don't really exist in the EU; plus the UK is a major defence industry power in the continent, and the capability for continuing the project is not a problem for the UK, but it is a problem for the the EU, which in this industry is mainly France, Germany, Italy, and a little bit in Spain, Belgium, and Holland.
Alone, the UK would speed past the remnants of the Galileo consortium, which would be struggling to scrape together funding and capacity, and that's before the question of refunding the UK's contribution, if they want to keep hold of the IP.
You need to be a little cautious and apply critical thinking and a bit of research when reading papers like "The Independent" and "The Guardian", which have a very unconcealed political agenda.
If only activists posing as journalists bothered to do basic journalistic investigation and properly inform their readers, we perhaps wouldn't be in such a tedious polarised state. As journalists let us all down with their clickbait, we all need to try a little harder to find credible facts from factual sources, not agenda-driven media outlets, and then armed with some basic facts the discussions can be a lot calmer and less personalised.
Space tech expertise is concentrated in a few locations around the world; and the EU has very poor growth compared to the Far East, North America, and other parts of the world. Britain's Aerospace expertise along with it's other areas of expertise is very welcome outside the EU and there's a lot of trade potential for the industry once it's unshackled from politicisation of business decisions, which is what EU involvement in industrial projects like this represents.
People from my part of the world miss the British presence, and the quality and standards it represents, and it's being eroded by being attached to the EU and all it's problems.
Much of the world is not free, and is crying out for Britain to return bring it's benign intellectual influence and free trade. Britain closing itself off from the world in a European club that isn't really doing itself or the rest of the world any good.