Of course, not everybody values the GFA:
Peter Geoghegan
@PeterKGeoghegan
1h
Gove wrote a pamphlet in 2000 called Northern Ireland: the Price of Peace in which he compared the agreement to the appeasement of the Nazis in the 1930s and the condoning of the desires of paedophiles.
In 2000 in Times, Gove wrote against GFA that "The real cause of conflict in Northern Ireland has not been the British presence, but British policy to dilute that presence."
In 2000, Michael Gove in Spectator described human rights law in Northern Ireland as 'the new terror'. Yep human rights is same as terror.
Gove wrote: 'if IRA active service units have been appeased, it is only because we now have, in the equality agenda of the Belfast Agreement, another ticking timebomb primed to disrupt our business and social life - one which no disposal squad is yet equipped to decommission.'
Last July an architect of Good Friday told me Gove was a “fanatic” who would be “dangerous” for the Northern Irish peace process and North-South relations if he won the Conservative Party leadership election.
Michael Gove has written at length about how awful Good Friday agreement is, shown no sign that his mind has changed, and now is part of UK gov telling anyone who shows concern for GFA that they're hysterical scaremongers
In August 1998, writing for Times a week after Omagh bomb, Gove wrote an anti-agreement jeremiad that included gushing sections about Vincent McKenna (not saying Gove knew McKenna's evil then)
Haha in 1999 Jacob Rees Mogg - who also seems no friend of GFA- wrote in Times that "Ultimatums rarely succeed and seem unlikely to work in Northern Ireland". Is that same Rees Mogg who favours hardline no deal ultimatum to EU??
"An ultimatum also weakens the position of the negotiator who makes it. Once a deadline has been set, it limits everyone's room for manoeuvre. It crystallises the negotiating position, and takes away the freedom to make concessions." Jacob Rees Mogg, Times, 1999