Feeling the need to share a counter narrative.
So the original £20 bn (I think) is the media's interpretation of 2 years net contributions during the transition. Don't see how anyone would argue we shouldn't pay this since it allows for the run off of existing commitments. Still leaves us £16 bn in pocket from the £350m on the bus during that 2 years.
On further commitments, no idea where the ("further £20 bn) guesstimates are coming from but it would be naive in the extreme to assume there were no further liabilities (will also be offsetting assets). Imo this is all about the politics of "winning".
On EMA / EBA it seems unfortunate that both have gone to EU6 countries. Gives the impression of siege mentality rather than looking outwards and embracing the full EU27.
Dublin had a good case for both and would have kept Anglophile / Transatlantic platform. Former Eastern block countries have strong expertise in medicine / healthcare which could have been harnessed. Paris will doubtless provide some sort of counterweight to German banking dominance but the risk is they all disappear down the same internal rabbit hole.
Looking forward to having NICE etc and BoE etc back properly in charge of their respective areas in the UK without the veneer of "oversight and co-operation" from the EU.
No idea what time it is in Moscow but just approaching 10 in dreich old Scotland.
Well done Richard Leonard for sticking to his football allegiances. You can be as "civically National" as you like but no-one trusts someone who doesn't know which team they're on - ask DC.