Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Brexit

Why I Voted to Leave the EU

394 replies

Asprilla11 · 26/06/2016 19:19

So I recently started a thread about the misconceptions many remain voters may have about why people voted leave. I argued that there were many reasons other than immigration and that the majority voted fully understanding what the outcome would mean.

On that thread and many more on MN the remain voters keep asking us WHY we voted and are annoyed when we don't answer in full, they forget that since the result SOME have acted in an aggressive and belittling manner towards us, so why would we feel engaged to reply? Many leave voters have had to spend time defending themselves because we have all been branded thick and racist. We are more than aware some racist people voted to leave in order to pursue their disgusting agenda, most leave voters don't want to be associated with those people and we condemn their stance.

I am willing to say my reasons why I voted leave, even if it means I am attacked for doing so.

EU Commissioners

They are not democratically elected (by EU Citizens) and the President has the final say on any candidate that a member state has put forward. Technically they are accountable to the European Parliament by the fact that the Parliament is able to force the entire Commission to resign through a vote of no confidence. However the Parliament has never done this, but have threatened to do it once. It also needs 2/3 of the Parliament to vote and agree on the reason for the no confidence vote. We can elect MEP's but they have little power over the commissioners.

The commissioners are paid nearly £200,000 per year (some more) and also get generous allowances, benefits and a very good pension. I do not believe the current commission deserve that level of pay, they simply have not earned it, I believe they put their own self interests above EU citizens and I believe they are morally and financially corrupt. If they were worth the salary then the amount would be fine, I just don't think they currently are.

EU Economy

There is very little growth and it is only going to get worse if the Eurozone fully collapses which I feel is a real possibility. Struggling EU nations such as Greece, Spain, Portugal and Italy are in massive debt, suffering with austerity and massive youth unemployment. I don't believe many of the of the other EU nations care about this, as long as the wealth benefits their country then they will pay lip service to those who are less fortunate. I also believe a lot of the benefits of the EU economy and the trade it brings also benefits the wealthier members of society more than the poor, in all of the EU member states.

If the EU had showed they would reform and a new fairer commission was set up which looked at making deals fairer for all EU member states and also looked at immigration in depth (not necessarily changing it) then I would have voted remain without a second thought. However the commission proved what an arrogant bunch they are even before Cameron went to get his 'deal', they won't reform, they don't want to and they don't care who knows it.

UK Economy

The UK will be 6-8 billion pounds better off after no longer paying the EU membership fee, even after the grants we used to receive are taken in to account. However there were several studies that pointed out that the loss in trade will far outweigh the savings from leaving the EU and we will actually be worse off financially. I didn't doubt some of the facts in those studies and I could see how they came to their conclusions, however even those studies have to admit they can't say for certain because nobody knows how quickly we will get new trade agreements with EU member states and how favorably they will be. Additionally although EU membership did not prevent trade deals with the commonwealth and other countries, it did reduce the need and the imagination to. It is only when those deals are in place can you truly say leaving the EU has left us worse or better off. In the short-term we will be worse off, I knew that risk prior to voting.

As a Labour supporter and also someone who is very distrusting of the current Tory Government I can hand on heart easily say that not a single thing Farage, Gove, Johnson and Duncan Smith said I believed at face value. In fact I consider Gove as one of the worst Education ministers ever and IDS I hold responsible for the suicide of some disabled benefit claimants, such an odious man. So believe me the leave MP's definitely didn't impress or influence me!

I did my own research which I always do whenever the Government (any party) state things as 'facts'. I knew the £350 million claim would be wrong (which remain supporters kept shouting was lies) however I also knew the Governments claim that every household in the UK would be £4300 worse off was also wrong, but do you get the leave voters shouting lies? Both sides lied, that is a fact!

Since the crash in 2008 many, many people in the UK (not just the British) have not seen any improvement in their wages or living standards. They have borne the brunt of austerity more than the people who could afford to. The 5th biggest economy in the world and an economy that has recovered and grown still has not brought any benefits to the poor and working class. They didn't consider how leaving the EU would affect their ISA's, Savings, Stocks and Shares because they don't have any! They didn't think about if their child could go to Uni because they would never have been able to afford that anyway. The poor and working class in the UK and the EU don't care if they are a bit worse off for a few more years, they are sick of the wealth that is generated only benefiting the wealthy, this was their chance to be heard.

Immigration

I wasn't going to mention this as it did not play much of a part (if any) in my decision and I also feel like as a leave supporter I have to keep defending myself whenever the word immigration is mentioned, simply because the remain voters keep saying we are all racist.

But here goes.

I worked in the Civil Service from the age of 19 for 15 years. I worked with people of all ages, all religions, all nationalities, LGBT and disabled people too. I matured as an adult in this environment and it undoubtedly made my life richer. I was also a Union Rep and defended colleagues in disciplinary, poor performance/attendance, diversity and disabilities (covered by the Equality Act 2010) meetings and hearings , both british and non-british. Since I left I have kept in touch with former colleagues who are now lifelong friends, some are British, some aren't, it wasn't a factor in whether we became friends or not.

I only mention all of that simply because a lot of remain voters think we have no positive outlook on immigrants and we don't mix in a multi-cultural society. They also think we don't understand the positive impact on the economy migrants (EU and non-EU) have. But actually most leave voters do, immigrants pay far more in to the system than they take out in benefits, that's a long standing, well known fact. There are far more british people who falsely claim benefits compared to immigrants.

Unfortunately I will admit there are parts of society, some of which voted leave who don't understand these truths. Some through lack of education, some through lack of life experience with people of diverse backgrounds and some sadly who are racist. These are the people who already felt poor, cut-off and unheard. UKIP and other politicians preyed on those peoples fears and told them they could help fix their problems.

That is not however the majority of leave supporters, I truly believe that. Most leave supporters have had experiences like mine and we all have experienced nothing but positive things from working and living with immigrants, EU and non-EU.

If the EU could have done one thing with immigration then I wish it gave all EU member states the ability to put a temporary block or cap on EU migration. I say this for the simple fact that the UK and other countries don't have the housing, schools and hospitals to cope with the current UK (not british) population growth, we simply aren't building enough of anything. When you add over 300,000 immigrants to that population growth you start to see the strain it creates.

I think the UK can cope with immigration well above 200,000, when it has the infrastructure in place, until then a temporary reduction or block until the work is done would be a useful tool to have. Alternatively you could look at using builders from the EU countries who could then come and work on those very buildings that are needed.

Finally on immigration, I think Governments in all EU countries need to act more responsibly on where and how immigrants are placed in to communities. Dumping some of the poorest immigrants in the poorest parts of the UK next to communities who are experiencing crime, unemployment and disillusionment with life in general and their prospects, is a disaster waiting to happen, especially when some of those people are known racists.

UK employers, EU employers and landlords in and out of the EU also need to be challenged more on their blatant exploitation of immigrants.

Ok flame away!

OP posts:
merrymouse · 02/07/2016 16:51

It'll be interesteing to see if people are still interested in the politics of the EU by the time there are real proposals for what to do next, or if things will have drifted back to the level of participation normal for EU elections.

caitlinohara · 02/07/2016 17:17

citroenpresse The electorate are not holding the EU responsible for all those things! But you cannot think that after how Greece have suffered that the EU is not similar in character? You will not find me defending the Tories and their disgraceful cuts in public spending. They blamed it all on Labour's management of the economy and now watch them blame it on Brexit. We can only hope that voters get wise to this and kick them out next GE. (Please change your name to baguettewaver, I like it! Smile)

unescorted I understand completely that some people just don't mind the set up. If it really doesn't bother you that Commissioners and the President are not chosen by citizens, then that is up to you. I consider that it is too far removed from the electorate, with too much power, and if I deem that they are not doing a good job, there is no process I can directly engage in to remove them. I want a Westminster government that answers to me, rather than me answering to Brussels.

I'm not going to deny that there is huge uncertainty now over the economy, but I've said it before and I'll keep saying it - that was entirely predictable and I believe entirely fixable in time. The consensus before the referendum was that there was likely to be a much smaller net difference in the end than either side was claiming, and it's too soon yet to say that that is not the case.

citroenpresse · 02/07/2016 17:25

Some hope merrymouse. They aren't interested in the politics of the EU now. If people voted 'leave' because they think the EU is 'undemocratic' there's not much hope. Over and out.

citroenpresse · 02/07/2016 17:27

But you cannot think that after how Greece have suffered that the EU is not similar in character

What on earth does this mean? Seriously, over and out.

Unescorted · 02/07/2016 22:08

Cait I have more choice over who is the commisioner or president than I do over who is in The House of Lords or Queen. The EU is answerable to the electorate where as our top 2 teirs of government are not. To say anything else merely shows your lack of understanding of how Westminster & teh EU work.

Roonerspism · 02/07/2016 22:11

What the fuck is all this over and out about?!

HippiePrincess · 03/07/2016 06:27

The House of Lords has been instrumental in proteecting us against some of the government's less brilliant ideas

what the fuck is all this over and out about?!
"Roger" that Grin

HippiePrincess · 03/07/2016 06:55

Obviously the HOL has also done the reverse of what I just said.

caitlinohara · 03/07/2016 09:07

Fairly sure I haven't been defending the HOL or the monarchy... It really doesn't sound like the sort of thing I would do... Grin

caitlinohara · 03/07/2016 09:08

I think over and out is code for 'flounce'....

Motheroffourdragons · 03/07/2016 09:22

This reply has been withdrawn

This has been withdrawn by MNHQ on behalf of the poster.

Unescorted · 03/07/2016 09:30

Hippie I agree with the HOL having atempering effect on the HoC / Number 10. But that does not make them accountable or elected.
I want a Westminster government that answers to me, rather than me answering to Brussels.*. I was pointing out that Westminster is not elected in it's entirety and in reality the EU is more accuntable to the electorate than the HoL or Monarchy.

citroenpresse · 03/07/2016 10:56

Apologies. It wasn't meant as a flounce. I came onto mumsnet to try and understand why people voted leave and feel so depressed at some of the answers. I wish those who felt such understandable anger at the arrogance and elitism of politicians could have directed that anger at the British government - who are the ones that control the country's purse strings - and not the EU, which is a profoundly more democratic institution.

caitlinohara · 03/07/2016 13:15

citroen Fair enough. I say we should do both. I am dismayed at the conduct of people representing us. I have no illusions about Westminster. I just don't think that the European Commission is full of kindly, principled souls who want the best for us either. I saw no evidence of a willingness to reform and its stated aims for more unity seemed incompatible with ours. I will be honest and say that I don't really know what I want to happen next, but even if for many people voting Leave was nothing more than an un-thought-through protest vote, I hope that that protest is now being taken seriously. I don't share the pessimism that people 'didn't care' any more. If they didn't care, they wouldn't have voted at all.

Were you completely happy with the EU? What do you want to happen next? Genuine question - I'm not being goady! I'm interested because the situation is changing constantly.

PS To go back to Greece - the treatment of Greece by the EU is pretty shoddy. If you are concerned about the Tory government's imposition of austerity in this country, you should also be alarmed by the EU's imposition of austerity on Greece as a bailout condition. There really is no moral high ground to be claimed there.

Roonerspism · 03/07/2016 13:22

The EU is "profoundly democratic"?

Look, I get that you are upset. But really, that is the most spurious angle of support I have heard yet!!!!!

roundaboutthetown · 03/07/2016 14:18

caitlinohara - with or without the EU, do you think impoverished Greece is going to be treated well by the rest of the world? Where's the precedent for being nice to impoverished countries in huge amounts of debt? I think the problem with the EU is people suddenly realised that they have to stick together in bad times as well as good, and when the chips are down, they are opting for shafting each other instead, in the hope it's not too late to avoid being pulled down with them, with the UK leading the way. We could, of course, have been a voice in Europe arguing against austerity and for giving massive amounts of aid to the people of Greece. But we didn't, did we? We just rubbed our hands in glee that it was a eurozone problem. And as for refugees - the EU is failing them, but we will be even more free to fail them when we can all close our borders and refuse to accept them. What we are doing is washing our hands of problems we don't find convenient, rather than reminding our EU neighbours of their responsibilities and humanity.

citroenpresse · 03/07/2016 15:08

Profoundly MORE democratic is what I said. There can't be a remainer that doesn't agree the EU needs reform. Yes, the (non-elected) Commission wields more influence but it is subject to the (directly elected) European Parliament. If we choose not to vote, it doesn't make the the institutional structure any less democratic. In the UK, 67% population didn't vote for the Tory Government, but we get 100% of their policies. And because the leader of the government has resigned, the BREXIT people-have-spoken button will be pressed by a woman who only 0.003% of the population has voted for. The EU is profoundly more democratic…surely that is obvious!!!!

caitlinohara · 03/07/2016 15:09

But then you're admitting that the EU is fundamentally flawed, because of the inequalities between countries and the lack of appetite to share wealth across the member states. Which it is. Unless it becomes fully integrated, which hardly anyone seems to want to do. Germany don't want to prop up the economies of Europe unless they get a say in how those countries handle welfare, pensions and taxes. And Greece would have fared much better if they had stuck with their own currency, but that horse has bolted. The whole 'European project' (I hate that term, it sounds like a Bond plot!) is doomed to failure because no one can agree on what they want it to be.

Lottielou7 · 03/07/2016 15:57

I've got a leaver telling me that the pound is currently up against the euro and that the pound will be a more stable investment when the Bank of England cuts interest rates. Are they actually reading the same stuff as me?! How do they figure this? I feel as though I've entered the twilight zone.

citroenpresse · 03/07/2016 16:26

Germany don't want to prop up the economies of Europe unless they get a say in how those countries handle welfare, pensions and taxes

Twilight zone indeed….Do Britain tell Croatia how they should run their health system? Or may Luxembourg has deep insight into the educational system of the Czech Republic…

It's NATIONAL GOVERNMENTS that determine welfare, pensions and taxes. How is that leavers just do not get this?

roundaboutthetown · 03/07/2016 16:46

Funnily enough, in our supposedly democratic UK system, it is OK to shaft the former industrial regions of the U.K. in the name of austerity, and to leave huge areas of our own country to decline, but when Germany doesn't like its own economy to suffer because of systemic problems in the Greek political system, but is nevertheless forced to engage with Greece and do something, because of its commitment to the EU, it is deeply selfish and undemocratic and blamed for being solely responsible, while other countries which didn't want to help at all hide behind that excuse. Amazing! As for Greece doing better if it had kept its own currency, there are no guarantees that a country like Greece, which for reasons best known to its politicians at the time lied its way into joining the euro, would have done better without the euro or whether it was always heading for trouble of one sort or another. And when it comes to the causes of austerity - that would be the boom and bust global financial markets gambling with people's futures for the personal gain of an exceedingly small number of individuals who definitely don't give a toss about Greece.

TulipsInAJug · 03/07/2016 16:53

OP, thanks for your original post. I also voted Leave for several of the same reasons you did.
For me, immigration didn't come into it. My concerns were for sovereignty and for democracy.

caitlinohara · 03/07/2016 17:26

citroen I don't mean to be rude, but I think you are misunderstanding what I am saying, or perhaps you don't know that Germany insisted upon austerity measures being imposed in Greece as a condition of the bailout, for which they and the EU were heavily criticised by the IMF and in the US. To be clear: I am against austerity, whether it's here or there. I'm only mentioning the Greece issue because many posters genuinely seem to think it's only our government who have harsh policies and that the other EU leaders and Brussels are all above reproach.

caitlinohara · 03/07/2016 17:29

roundabout yes I know they did 'something', albeit with pretty dire consequences for Greece, but again it only serves to make my point that unless wealth is distributed evenly and the rich countries prop up the poorer ones in a full on federal system, this is obviously going to happen again and again, and it's not working.

roundaboutthetown · 03/07/2016 18:17

So better not to learn not to be so harsh in future and instead to conclude that it's better to be selfish and pull the whole lot down so that we can all be freely selfish in future?