Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Brexit

Why I Voted to Leave the EU

394 replies

Asprilla11 · 26/06/2016 19:19

So I recently started a thread about the misconceptions many remain voters may have about why people voted leave. I argued that there were many reasons other than immigration and that the majority voted fully understanding what the outcome would mean.

On that thread and many more on MN the remain voters keep asking us WHY we voted and are annoyed when we don't answer in full, they forget that since the result SOME have acted in an aggressive and belittling manner towards us, so why would we feel engaged to reply? Many leave voters have had to spend time defending themselves because we have all been branded thick and racist. We are more than aware some racist people voted to leave in order to pursue their disgusting agenda, most leave voters don't want to be associated with those people and we condemn their stance.

I am willing to say my reasons why I voted leave, even if it means I am attacked for doing so.

EU Commissioners

They are not democratically elected (by EU Citizens) and the President has the final say on any candidate that a member state has put forward. Technically they are accountable to the European Parliament by the fact that the Parliament is able to force the entire Commission to resign through a vote of no confidence. However the Parliament has never done this, but have threatened to do it once. It also needs 2/3 of the Parliament to vote and agree on the reason for the no confidence vote. We can elect MEP's but they have little power over the commissioners.

The commissioners are paid nearly £200,000 per year (some more) and also get generous allowances, benefits and a very good pension. I do not believe the current commission deserve that level of pay, they simply have not earned it, I believe they put their own self interests above EU citizens and I believe they are morally and financially corrupt. If they were worth the salary then the amount would be fine, I just don't think they currently are.

EU Economy

There is very little growth and it is only going to get worse if the Eurozone fully collapses which I feel is a real possibility. Struggling EU nations such as Greece, Spain, Portugal and Italy are in massive debt, suffering with austerity and massive youth unemployment. I don't believe many of the of the other EU nations care about this, as long as the wealth benefits their country then they will pay lip service to those who are less fortunate. I also believe a lot of the benefits of the EU economy and the trade it brings also benefits the wealthier members of society more than the poor, in all of the EU member states.

If the EU had showed they would reform and a new fairer commission was set up which looked at making deals fairer for all EU member states and also looked at immigration in depth (not necessarily changing it) then I would have voted remain without a second thought. However the commission proved what an arrogant bunch they are even before Cameron went to get his 'deal', they won't reform, they don't want to and they don't care who knows it.

UK Economy

The UK will be 6-8 billion pounds better off after no longer paying the EU membership fee, even after the grants we used to receive are taken in to account. However there were several studies that pointed out that the loss in trade will far outweigh the savings from leaving the EU and we will actually be worse off financially. I didn't doubt some of the facts in those studies and I could see how they came to their conclusions, however even those studies have to admit they can't say for certain because nobody knows how quickly we will get new trade agreements with EU member states and how favorably they will be. Additionally although EU membership did not prevent trade deals with the commonwealth and other countries, it did reduce the need and the imagination to. It is only when those deals are in place can you truly say leaving the EU has left us worse or better off. In the short-term we will be worse off, I knew that risk prior to voting.

As a Labour supporter and also someone who is very distrusting of the current Tory Government I can hand on heart easily say that not a single thing Farage, Gove, Johnson and Duncan Smith said I believed at face value. In fact I consider Gove as one of the worst Education ministers ever and IDS I hold responsible for the suicide of some disabled benefit claimants, such an odious man. So believe me the leave MP's definitely didn't impress or influence me!

I did my own research which I always do whenever the Government (any party) state things as 'facts'. I knew the £350 million claim would be wrong (which remain supporters kept shouting was lies) however I also knew the Governments claim that every household in the UK would be £4300 worse off was also wrong, but do you get the leave voters shouting lies? Both sides lied, that is a fact!

Since the crash in 2008 many, many people in the UK (not just the British) have not seen any improvement in their wages or living standards. They have borne the brunt of austerity more than the people who could afford to. The 5th biggest economy in the world and an economy that has recovered and grown still has not brought any benefits to the poor and working class. They didn't consider how leaving the EU would affect their ISA's, Savings, Stocks and Shares because they don't have any! They didn't think about if their child could go to Uni because they would never have been able to afford that anyway. The poor and working class in the UK and the EU don't care if they are a bit worse off for a few more years, they are sick of the wealth that is generated only benefiting the wealthy, this was their chance to be heard.

Immigration

I wasn't going to mention this as it did not play much of a part (if any) in my decision and I also feel like as a leave supporter I have to keep defending myself whenever the word immigration is mentioned, simply because the remain voters keep saying we are all racist.

But here goes.

I worked in the Civil Service from the age of 19 for 15 years. I worked with people of all ages, all religions, all nationalities, LGBT and disabled people too. I matured as an adult in this environment and it undoubtedly made my life richer. I was also a Union Rep and defended colleagues in disciplinary, poor performance/attendance, diversity and disabilities (covered by the Equality Act 2010) meetings and hearings , both british and non-british. Since I left I have kept in touch with former colleagues who are now lifelong friends, some are British, some aren't, it wasn't a factor in whether we became friends or not.

I only mention all of that simply because a lot of remain voters think we have no positive outlook on immigrants and we don't mix in a multi-cultural society. They also think we don't understand the positive impact on the economy migrants (EU and non-EU) have. But actually most leave voters do, immigrants pay far more in to the system than they take out in benefits, that's a long standing, well known fact. There are far more british people who falsely claim benefits compared to immigrants.

Unfortunately I will admit there are parts of society, some of which voted leave who don't understand these truths. Some through lack of education, some through lack of life experience with people of diverse backgrounds and some sadly who are racist. These are the people who already felt poor, cut-off and unheard. UKIP and other politicians preyed on those peoples fears and told them they could help fix their problems.

That is not however the majority of leave supporters, I truly believe that. Most leave supporters have had experiences like mine and we all have experienced nothing but positive things from working and living with immigrants, EU and non-EU.

If the EU could have done one thing with immigration then I wish it gave all EU member states the ability to put a temporary block or cap on EU migration. I say this for the simple fact that the UK and other countries don't have the housing, schools and hospitals to cope with the current UK (not british) population growth, we simply aren't building enough of anything. When you add over 300,000 immigrants to that population growth you start to see the strain it creates.

I think the UK can cope with immigration well above 200,000, when it has the infrastructure in place, until then a temporary reduction or block until the work is done would be a useful tool to have. Alternatively you could look at using builders from the EU countries who could then come and work on those very buildings that are needed.

Finally on immigration, I think Governments in all EU countries need to act more responsibly on where and how immigrants are placed in to communities. Dumping some of the poorest immigrants in the poorest parts of the UK next to communities who are experiencing crime, unemployment and disillusionment with life in general and their prospects, is a disaster waiting to happen, especially when some of those people are known racists.

UK employers, EU employers and landlords in and out of the EU also need to be challenged more on their blatant exploitation of immigrants.

Ok flame away!

OP posts:
SnowBells · 28/06/2016 12:49

Here's an article by a Leaver saying Brexit won't happen in the end:

Even though we voted for it, a Brexit won't happen in the end. Here's why

MangosteenSoda · 28/06/2016 13:09

Thanks for the well written and considered view. I think a lot of leave voters think that way but struggle to articulate it as well as you did. I think a lot of remain voters get frustrated because it often boils down to, 'but the immigrants'.
I know I'm late to the party here, but I wanted to respond to some of your points. If anyone's still reading this thread...

EU Commissioners

They are not democratically elected (by EU Citizens) and the President has the final say on any candidate that a member state has put forward. We can elect MEP's but they have little power over the commissioners.

They are nominated by the governments of the member states, much in the same way an ambassador is. They represent our elected governments. MEP's can vote to refuse their appointment.
If we voted them in, they would essentially be above national governments. We are/were in a union - they are our nominated representatives.

The commissioners are paid nearly £200,000 per year (some more) and also get generous allowances, benefits and a very good pension. I do not believe the current commission deserve that level of pay, they simply have not earned it, I believe they put their own self interests above EU citizens and I believe they are morally and financially corrupt. If they were worth the salary then the amount would be fine, I just don't think they currently are.

It's a lot of money. I don't know how much other ambassadors get paid. I don't know whether you have a point here or not because you give no reasons/examples/evidence WHY they are corrupt etc. It's a skilled diplomatic job which requires expertise in public policy and negotiation. They cannot opt out like MEPs (Farage) who can be on committees they never attend.

EU Economy

I also believe a lot of the benefits of the EU economy and the trade it brings also benefits the wealthier members of society more than the poor, in all of the EU member states.

This is true around the world - much more so than in the EU where the wealth gap is not so great. Poor people in the EU have much more access to services and state help than in most other places in the world. This is not an EU specific problem.

UK Economy

The UK will be 6-8 billion pounds better off after no longer paying the EU membership fee, even after the grants we used to receive are taken in to account. However there were several studies that pointed out that the loss in trade will far outweigh the savings from leaving the EU and we will actually be worse off financially. I didn't doubt some of the facts in those studies and I could see how they came to their conclusions, however even those studies have to admit they can't say for certain because nobody knows how quickly we will get new trade agreements with EU member states and how favorably they will be. Additionally although EU membership did not prevent trade deals with the commonwealth and other countries, it did reduce the need and the imagination to. It is only when those deals are in place can you truly say leaving the EU has left us worse or better off. In the short-term we will be worse off, I knew that risk prior to voting.

The general consensus of worldwide economists believe the UK will be worse off. It will take time to make trade agreements which are not guaranteed to be more favourable than what we have now. It will be painful for a lot of people. This is a more than a risk - you are willing to seriously negatively affect real people's incomes, mortgage stability and pensions amongst other things.

As a Labour supporter and also someone who is very distrusting of the current Tory Government I can hand on heart easily say that not a single thing Farage, Gove, Johnson and Duncan Smith said I believed at face value. In fact I consider Gove as one of the worst Education ministers ever and IDS I hold responsible for the suicide of some disabled benefit claimants, such an odious man. So believe me the leave MP's definitely didn't impress or influence me!

But you supported them and their lack of plan. All of the parties bar UKIP were saying NO.

Since the crash in 2008 many, many people in the UK (not just the British) have not seen any improvement in their wages or living standards. They have borne the brunt of austerity more than the people who could afford to. The 5th biggest economy in the world and an economy that has recovered and grown still has not brought any benefits to the poor and working class. They didn't consider how leaving the EU would affect their ISA's, Savings, Stocks and Shares because they don't have any! They didn't think about if their child could go to Uni because they would never have been able to afford that anyway. The poor and working class in the UK and the EU don't care if they are a bit worse off for a few more years, they are sick of the wealth that is generated only benefiting the wealthy, this was their chance to be heard.

I agree with the sentiment, but that is down to UK government domestic policy - not the EU. They will also be the ones who suffer the most after Brexit.

Immigration

If the EU could have done one thing with immigration then I wish it gave all EU member states the ability to put a temporary block or cap on EU migration. I say this for the simple fact that the UK and other countries don't have the housing, schools and hospitals to cope with the current UK (not british) population growth, we simply aren't building enough of anything. When you add over 300,000 immigrants to that population growth you start to see the strain it creates.

I see your point, maybe a temporary cap could be something that could work. The member states' governments must be the ones to ensure full provision of services. This is down, in the UK, to the Tory policy of public service cuts and continued austerity.

Finally on immigration, I think Governments in all EU countries need to act more responsibly on where and how immigrants are placed in to communities. Dumping some of the poorest immigrants in the poorest parts of the UK next to communities who are experiencing crime, unemployment and disillusionment with life in general and their prospects, is a disaster waiting to happen, especially when some of those people are known racists.

I think you are conflating EU and non EU immigration here. Particularly asylum seekers. The UK government does not 'place' EU immigrants. They have freedom of movement and live where they have found work. Non EU immigration is higher than EU immigration.

UK employers, EU employers and landlords in and out of the EU also need to be challenged more on their blatant exploitation of immigrants.

Which is in the UK government's own remit if you are talking about immigrants in the UK.

GoodLoveShinesBrightly · 28/06/2016 14:06

What I don't really understand is how the way all these problems (the immigrants have taken our jobs, austerity, lack of public services) have somehow come to be believed as the fault of the EU. Seriously, why do people think it's the EU's fault? How has that narrative come about? Is it a failure of the Left as a proper opposition to the Tories? Why do so many people believe it when it stands up to no scrutiny at all?

citroenpresse · 28/06/2016 19:06

What I don't really understand is how people are suddenly so terrified of the control and power of the EU but only 35% of Brits bothered to vote in the European Elections. 73 members of the European Parliament, all on lavish salaries, all of whom are meant to be representing our interests in Europe. Who is calling them to account?

SnowBells · 28/06/2016 19:34

I don't think many people worried about those things until some politicians and Rupert Murdoch put the seeds into people's minds.

Chris1234567890 · 29/06/2016 01:35

Oh dear. Lets try for one last time shall we.

Firstly, the tears, the tantrums, the 'racist, knuckle dragging ' rhetoric is over. The vote is done.
The losers arent happy. What do you want me to say. Surprise?
The losers want to cancel that vote and do it again, because the racist, stupid, knuckle draggers are having either a/ leavers remorse b/ woke up the next day to the 'truth' c/ finally understood how this affects their wallet.

Ive read that Independant article. Remainers, you must wake up to the fact that YOU are being manipulated. No mention in that article of the 1975 referendum? Really???? A little strange given the agenda. No mention in that article that 42% of AB's (thats the top two education/wealth social classes of our society) voted leave. (Allison Pearson, Telegraph)
No mention in that article, that hello, we werent asked about the Lisbon Treaty which extended what was a trade 'union' into a political union, (no doubt we were too stupid), a treaty that indeed places EU law, above our own.

Remain told you we have representation and we have the right to veto. No we dont. I quoted previously somewhere, 55 times weve said no, and 55 times theyve told us to fuck off. I was wrong. Its been 72 occasions. 72 times we objected and 72 times we were told to fuck off. This isnt objecting to what biscuits were having with our coffee! We have no influence on the self appointed law makers. Thats it.

59% of our laws, the laws we now live under, were made in the EU. Not only do we have no power to reject eu laws being imposed on us, but the EU can and has, rejected laws we wish to make ourselves, for us, in our own country. (Toby Young, Spectator, Jeremy Paxman). I suggest if you want to understand some of the 'higher' arguments for leave, Toby Youngs 'Brexit-The facts' is a good start.

Getting back to the gutter level. The whole 'stupid' argument. Ridicule the people of Cornwall if you wish, but you completely miss the point. The people of Cornwall know exactly who pays their salary every month. They voted anyway. The 'elderly', you know, the ones who robbed the future of their grandchildren (and no doubt are back on the euthanasia debate due to huge burden on the NHS), completely understand whats going on. They built the businesses that the young are now enjoying their graduate programmes in. Some sitting comfortably on large pensions, some on modest, knew the full impact of Brexit on the financial institutions. They voted anyway. I, a lifelong capitalist supporter, with a mortgage, with responsibilities, with the same daily struggles to balance the books as the rest of you. I voted anyway. The point that has utterly passed you by, that only now Im realising you just cant get your head round is, leavers didnt vote for their wallet. They voted on something far more important. Self governance, and democracy. There really is no price on that. Something the remainers cant grasp.

Continue this utterly disrespectful protest. I wish you luck, but all you are doing is galvanising the leave camp and indeed adding to their ranks.
Citroen, you really dont understand why no one bothers to vote in european elections, for representatives, that have absolutely no power or influence in the european council? Oh weve understood alright. We need to turn up, be on the books, to access the single market.
This was the price our establishment were happy to pay, for access to a single market. Leavers refuse to pay it. This isnt a sudden shock. Its simply weve never been asked before.

Ill leave you (she says flouncing to flouncers corner) with Max Hastings from last fridays DM (I know, I know) but for one moment give even Max Hastings, a little respect. He really has earned it.

"We Remainers should accept the possibility that the voters of Britain, not for the first time, have shown better judgment than the clever-clogs and doomsters, whose views I and others accepted." Max Hastings.

Now please, for the sake of the nation, accept we live in a democracy. Blame your grandparents for that.

SnowBells · 29/06/2016 03:09

Chris1234567890

It is a democracy. So accept that some of us are disgruntled. Accept that while over the years (and I hope it was years and not just the propaganda of the last few months) you were unhappy with the EU, others were happy. Now, the tide has turned and we might feel like you felt during those years. And yes, we might want to create a movement to get this referendum result overturned, but hey, we live in a democracy and we are allowed to. The 52% can't just tell us to shut up.

This referendum was mightily flawed anyway as you could only really choose between two boxes: remain and leave. "Remain" stood pretty much for maintaining what we had. The result of voting remain was known. Ticking that box, you literally had the benefits of hindsight. However, as we now all know too well, there was never any plan for what a "Leave" world would look like. So the "Leave" box stood for pretty much ANYTHING the "Remain" box didn't. Anyone who was disgruntled with the world as it was could click "Leave". Hence, the Leavers span all the spectrum - from far-right idiots (and yes, the far-right will always be fuckwits to me) to people with left-leaning ideals who just felt out of touch with the current Tory government. This results in the Leave camp being hugely fragmented, and that is trouble. At the end of the day, there are numerous ways for Brexit to be implemented, and each scenario will not please all of the 52% who voted leave. Let us not delude ourselves here - the EU will not give the UK special treatment; that's clear from all the interviews with people who actually know the EU very well (the experts the Leave camp does not want to listen to).

What will likely happen is that Bojo & Gove (or whoever will lead the Brexit negotiations) will choose one of the many options available to them. Each of which will carry compromises (and I'm told that most people don't like political compromises). And if you're lucky - this may please less than 25% of those who voted to leave. Others will complain. "This is not what I wanted," they will say. See, us Remainers had the benefit of hindsight. We knew what we were in for.

What kind of democracy is it that seeks to please less than 25%, completely disregards how 48% of the population feels and ignores the 27% disillusioned leavers?!?

Democracy, my ass. Democracy died on 24th June 2016.
I would have understood, if the form had more boxes. One remain box and a box for each Brexit scenario. This might actually have led to the Leave camp to... you know... have a plan. But no, you will say that this would be unfair because given the fragmentation of the Leave camp, most likely "Remain" would have won.

Chris1234567890 · 29/06/2016 04:03

Youve nearly got it snowbells.

"The 52% can't just tell us to shut up." Yes they can.

Shout, scream, take to the streets. Keep going. But the crux is, yes they can. What are you going to do next?

Absolutely right about an In/Out vote. It was all to do with hindsight. It was all to do with the status quo. Remainers voted to keep it. Leavers rejected it. That is exactly what the vote was. All this other hot air is just that, hot air. This wasnt a general election, where parties put up their policies and manifestos. This wasnt a general election for the 'Brexit Party'. It was exactly as you describe. Hindsight, status quo, do you like it? do you want to keep it? do you want to stay in it? If not, vote out.

You are utterly underestimating the support for leave. You beleive, that what you are now seeing is a shift in the tide. You are not. The behaviour of the remains, is in short, utterly disgraceful and utterly undemocratic. You are not protesting some policy on animal experimentation, you are protesting against a referendum. The behaviour of all politicians this week, has been, utterly disgraceful.

Just in case you doubt me any further, think on this. A huge amount of leave votes were lost due to the murder of Jo Cox. A huge amount of leave votes were lost by the Farage/EDL effect, and the "all racists vote leave" soundbite. What you are now doing is anarchy. You are protesting a democratic vote. The very thing the leave voters ironically voted to protect by voting leave!

Not only are the remain camp supporting an undemocratic organisation in the EU, they are now demonstrating their contempt for a democracy at home.

I can guarantee you, that the shift in support for leave, is only going the opposite way to what you think it is. This week, 17 million could march on Westminster. Because of your actions, next week, 27 million could march on Westminster. The longer this carries on, the longer David Cameron tries to play student politics with democracy, that number continues to rise.

The fight youve chosen to pick, is the one fight you cannot win. Protesting democracy.

SnowBells · 29/06/2016 07:50

Gbloody hell, chris.

What the f*ck you think a referendum is? Do you think it's some weird, holy shit? The voice of the freakin' people?!

It's just a bloody opinion poll. Has been done many times before. And governments are free to ignore it (and there are plenty of cases where they previously have)

SnowBells · 29/06/2016 07:53

Oh, yeah... and life went on even when they chose to ignore the result of a referendum.

Have a great day on your little island.

puglife15 · 29/06/2016 08:04

If we were truly a democratic country, we wouldn't have FPTP with a government in charge which most people didn't vote for

We wouldn't have a House of Lords

We wouldn't have a monarch who had political involvement

We wouldn't have a campaign for a referendum littered withoutrageous lies, amplified by a money-driven media

What is democratic about "winning" an election, a vote or a referendum when it's taken lying to and manipulation of the people to do it?

MrsBlackthorn · 29/06/2016 09:13

Democracy isn't a one-off vote. It's elections, lobbying our MPs, taking to the streets, it's voting in a government who can end this madness - and yes, it's even petitions.

People who think democracy begins and ends with one glorified national opinion poll clearly have no idea what democracy means.

IpanemaChica · 29/06/2016 09:26

mango I'm still reading. Thought your post was a really good response.

SnowBells · 29/06/2016 09:29

I tried figuring out what exactly pissed me off about the post by chris .

You are utterly underestimating the support for leave. You beleive, that what you are now seeing is a shift in the tide. You are not.

This.

It could have been written by a freakin' terrorist group. Just replace 'leave' with something else.

And yes, he/she doesn't know what democracy truly is. By his/her definition, America would still have slaves now, because I'm pretty sure the topic was brought up hundreds of years ago, asking whether slaves should be kept or not, the majority voted "keep".

babybythesea · 29/06/2016 09:42

Chris, I'm not sure the people of Cornwall did really understand who paid them. I live here. I had arguments with people who said things like "It gives money to the Eden Project and I never go there so it doesn't affect me." When I pointed out the Truro Park and Ride, the airport, the Camborne -Redruth link road, the Truro Falmouth rail link, he said "that's not in my area, I don't use that stuff. It won't affect me."
I've spoken to someone else today who voted leave. She didn't realise that Cornwall even got any money, and told me she voted against cities the size of Wolverhampton being built to accommodate all these immigrants.
Some people did understand and voted out anyway, but most didn't. Most feel alienated and forgotten about by the UK govt and thought this would be a great chance to show them that Cornwall matters.

citroenpresse · 29/06/2016 15:09

A response to some of those strange claims:

"No mention in that article that 42% of AB's (thats the top two education/wealth social classes of our society) voted leave. (Allison Pearson, Telegraph)."

This figure is based on a POLL by Lord Ashcroft (the non-dom who was incensed when he didn’t get a seat in cabinet despite pouring millions into Tory coffers. And took his revenge. Remember the piggy scandal?). But yes, more nuanced studies show that an overwhelming majority of Abs voted Remain. And your point is?

“Remain told you we have representation and we have the right to veto. No we dont. I quoted previously somewhere, 55 times weve said no, and 55 times theyve told us to fuck off. I was wrong. Its been 72 occasions. 72 times we objected and 72 times we were told to fuck off. "

55 (or 72) times ‘we’ have said NO to what? Who is ‘we’ and who are ‘they’? Those who think ‘British influence’ in Europe has declined though, are right. Britain’s largest party in Europe (UKIP) is in the extreme right wing camp, with members that want to distance themselves from Europe so we are no longer engaged in the more moderate and centrist groups that are the vast majority. If we wanted more influence in Europe we should have voted for different politicians. That’s democracy. Britain has actually got more power in Europe than other countries so it’s hardly surprising there is joy that we are off. Did leavers understand that? Because our trading partners will still be following European standards and guidelines, we will have to as well but we won’t have any say in how they are made.
60811b39eee4e42e277a-72b421883bb5b133f34e068afdd7cb11.r29.cf3.rackcdn.com/2016/04/VoteWatch-Report-2016_digital.pdf

"59% of our laws, the laws we now live under, were made in the EU."

I’ve no idea what that 59% relates to or even whether it matters. What EU ‘laws’ affect the quality of your life? The allocation of money to housing, education, health, welfare is NOT determined in the EU.

"Leavers didnt vote for their wallet. They voted on something far more important. Self governance, and democracy. There really is no price on that. Something the remainers cant grasp."

You can speak for all leavers then? And why they voted? Were we watching the same campaign? You don’t feel that leavers could possibly have been influenced by: We could save 350 million pounds a week (a lie) and spend it on services like the NHS (also a lie). Or by Nigel Farage (not a member of British Parliament) in front of a poster of Syrian refugees saying Britain is at breaking point. (Subliminal message – vote leave and we can close our borders to immigrants). What did leavers vote FOR? There have ALWAYS been libertarians who believe in sovereignty and that we shouldn’t be in Europe and I know people in that camp and I can see why they voted leave. The original founder of UKIP was one of them, who also said that UKIP MEPs should not sit in the European Parliament – an institution they were actively trying to dismantle, and they should not take MEP salaries. That all changed when Farage came on board. But that’s a teeny teeny percentage of the population. NOT voting for members of the European parliament, but then complaining that we have no influence is not democracy as I understand it.

If self-governance means that Britons will continue to vote for Tories (and their vested interests) with politicians that continue to drive up hate and discord who peddle lies and misinformation, surely you can see why many remainers feel much much safer in Europe.

HippiePrincess · 29/06/2016 22:32

I tried figuring out what exactly pissed me off about the post by chris .

"You are utterly underestimating the support for leave. You beleive, that what you are now seeing is a shift in the tide. You are not.

This.

It could have been written by a freakin' terrorist group. Just replace 'leave' with something else. "
snowbells This is an outrageous and unjustified statement.
There is no threat to harm here. No aggression in the face of disagreement. It is utterly unacceptable to liken a support for a passionate democratic response to terrorism. Utterly deplorable.

SnowBells · 29/06/2016 23:34

HippiePrincess

Have you seen terrorist threats before? Just a hint - I lost a close relative due to terrorists, so please don't push this.

It's always about us underestimating them. It's always about us thinking this is something new, but it's not.

Sends alarm bells ringing.

HippiePrincess · 30/06/2016 05:37

Snowbells
I am not pushing you on anything. You likened a MNer's post to a terrorist statement. That is outrageous and deserves challenging.
Your personal loss (do you think you're the only person to have experienced such a thing?) does not make you an expert, neither does it mean you are exempt from being pulled up being unreasonable.

HelpfulChap · 30/06/2016 06:18

Good thread.

I am a Leaver and have no regrets about my vote.

However what has become apparent now some of the dust has settled is that this issue is in the process of becoming a political 'fudge'.

The Conservatives will, in my opinion, give the leadership to 'soft Remainer' May and not 'soft Leaver' Bojo.
Labour will also elect a 'strong Remain' rather than 'soft Remain' Corbyn.

On the current path, I think we will end up with some sort of 'Norway-plus' deal as we are a far larger economy & Merkel (whose opinion is the one that really counts) seems quite conciliatory.
This could be the worst of both worlds, neither in nor out. Both In and Leave would be left wondering why we bothered with a referendum at all.

If Remain politicians from ALL parties really want to reverse the decision of the electorate they should put their differences to one side, form a Remain alliance, force a general election and stand as one entity.
They would win.

They could legitimately go back to the electorate and call another referendum.

Obviously this won't happen as there are too many vested interests.

merrymouse · 30/06/2016 06:33

55 times weve said no, and 55 times theyve told us to fuck off.

This statistic is covered on this edition of 'More or Less'.

www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p03yfstm

The UK voted 'no' on 58/72 policies compared to voting 'yes' on 2466 policies. I can't imagine a situation where any group of people larger than 1 would agree on everything.

The 59% includes every last EU regulation, including those that have nothing to do with the UK. So for instance EU regulations for olive farming. If you look at UK laws that
Are influenced by EU rules it's more like 15%

However, the reality is that you can't really express the EU's control of law as a %, and it really depends which rules they are controlling.

We don't/didn't have a right of veto on every last little bit of legislation, otherwise the EU would grind to a halt. We can/could veto countries joining the EU and we certainly won't be conscripting UK civilians into an EU army because of EU law.

There might be good reasons for leaving the EU, but Farage's statistics aren't one of them.

SnowBells · 30/06/2016 06:53

HippiePrincess

Ok. Sorry.

I just felt really threatened by those lines. Made me feel like there's some underground, radical leavers group or something that is about to rise. But I realise it may have been written to provoke.

screamingeels · 30/06/2016 07:52

Thanks for this thread - I know it has descended into argument a bit. But as a remain voter it's really helpful to hear the thoughtful reasons beyond the campaign rhetoric of why people voted leave because it's these points we are going to have to build some kind of post EU society on.

Whatever else is happening it's no secret the status quo in politics is not working. (My personal view is the EU is a lot more democratic than Whitehall/Wesrminster but people tend not to be aware of how their own government works).

oblada · 30/06/2016 08:22

Without going into what is or isn't stupid, the whole problem with the vote Leave is that there are no many different reasons and that we need a thread like this. It shows that there is no actual 'mandate' to leave because the terms of that mandate vary from person to person depending on why they have voted Leave...

citroenpresse · 30/06/2016 08:34

I would totally agree with screamingeels that the EU is much more democratic.

Leaving (Norway Plus or whatever), is likely to cost the same as the UK EU contribution now. (We can expect no favours.)
it will include free movement of people (one of the 4 basic principles. Can absolutely expect no favours there).
We will probably need to follow the same regulations as our trading neighbours (without any say in that regulation process).

We won't be benefitting any more from EU regeneration or innovation or scientific or creative funds and there are thousands of those projects in the UK. All this information can be found online. Want to know the true status of employment and immigration from our own Government? The Guardian have been trying to get figures since last August.

Maybe we'll still have some kind of voice in Europe or internationally (defence etc) but we've already trashed our national reputation with this referendum and it's getting worse every day.