Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Brexit

Why I Voted to Leave the EU

394 replies

Asprilla11 · 26/06/2016 19:19

So I recently started a thread about the misconceptions many remain voters may have about why people voted leave. I argued that there were many reasons other than immigration and that the majority voted fully understanding what the outcome would mean.

On that thread and many more on MN the remain voters keep asking us WHY we voted and are annoyed when we don't answer in full, they forget that since the result SOME have acted in an aggressive and belittling manner towards us, so why would we feel engaged to reply? Many leave voters have had to spend time defending themselves because we have all been branded thick and racist. We are more than aware some racist people voted to leave in order to pursue their disgusting agenda, most leave voters don't want to be associated with those people and we condemn their stance.

I am willing to say my reasons why I voted leave, even if it means I am attacked for doing so.

EU Commissioners

They are not democratically elected (by EU Citizens) and the President has the final say on any candidate that a member state has put forward. Technically they are accountable to the European Parliament by the fact that the Parliament is able to force the entire Commission to resign through a vote of no confidence. However the Parliament has never done this, but have threatened to do it once. It also needs 2/3 of the Parliament to vote and agree on the reason for the no confidence vote. We can elect MEP's but they have little power over the commissioners.

The commissioners are paid nearly £200,000 per year (some more) and also get generous allowances, benefits and a very good pension. I do not believe the current commission deserve that level of pay, they simply have not earned it, I believe they put their own self interests above EU citizens and I believe they are morally and financially corrupt. If they were worth the salary then the amount would be fine, I just don't think they currently are.

EU Economy

There is very little growth and it is only going to get worse if the Eurozone fully collapses which I feel is a real possibility. Struggling EU nations such as Greece, Spain, Portugal and Italy are in massive debt, suffering with austerity and massive youth unemployment. I don't believe many of the of the other EU nations care about this, as long as the wealth benefits their country then they will pay lip service to those who are less fortunate. I also believe a lot of the benefits of the EU economy and the trade it brings also benefits the wealthier members of society more than the poor, in all of the EU member states.

If the EU had showed they would reform and a new fairer commission was set up which looked at making deals fairer for all EU member states and also looked at immigration in depth (not necessarily changing it) then I would have voted remain without a second thought. However the commission proved what an arrogant bunch they are even before Cameron went to get his 'deal', they won't reform, they don't want to and they don't care who knows it.

UK Economy

The UK will be 6-8 billion pounds better off after no longer paying the EU membership fee, even after the grants we used to receive are taken in to account. However there were several studies that pointed out that the loss in trade will far outweigh the savings from leaving the EU and we will actually be worse off financially. I didn't doubt some of the facts in those studies and I could see how they came to their conclusions, however even those studies have to admit they can't say for certain because nobody knows how quickly we will get new trade agreements with EU member states and how favorably they will be. Additionally although EU membership did not prevent trade deals with the commonwealth and other countries, it did reduce the need and the imagination to. It is only when those deals are in place can you truly say leaving the EU has left us worse or better off. In the short-term we will be worse off, I knew that risk prior to voting.

As a Labour supporter and also someone who is very distrusting of the current Tory Government I can hand on heart easily say that not a single thing Farage, Gove, Johnson and Duncan Smith said I believed at face value. In fact I consider Gove as one of the worst Education ministers ever and IDS I hold responsible for the suicide of some disabled benefit claimants, such an odious man. So believe me the leave MP's definitely didn't impress or influence me!

I did my own research which I always do whenever the Government (any party) state things as 'facts'. I knew the £350 million claim would be wrong (which remain supporters kept shouting was lies) however I also knew the Governments claim that every household in the UK would be £4300 worse off was also wrong, but do you get the leave voters shouting lies? Both sides lied, that is a fact!

Since the crash in 2008 many, many people in the UK (not just the British) have not seen any improvement in their wages or living standards. They have borne the brunt of austerity more than the people who could afford to. The 5th biggest economy in the world and an economy that has recovered and grown still has not brought any benefits to the poor and working class. They didn't consider how leaving the EU would affect their ISA's, Savings, Stocks and Shares because they don't have any! They didn't think about if their child could go to Uni because they would never have been able to afford that anyway. The poor and working class in the UK and the EU don't care if they are a bit worse off for a few more years, they are sick of the wealth that is generated only benefiting the wealthy, this was their chance to be heard.

Immigration

I wasn't going to mention this as it did not play much of a part (if any) in my decision and I also feel like as a leave supporter I have to keep defending myself whenever the word immigration is mentioned, simply because the remain voters keep saying we are all racist.

But here goes.

I worked in the Civil Service from the age of 19 for 15 years. I worked with people of all ages, all religions, all nationalities, LGBT and disabled people too. I matured as an adult in this environment and it undoubtedly made my life richer. I was also a Union Rep and defended colleagues in disciplinary, poor performance/attendance, diversity and disabilities (covered by the Equality Act 2010) meetings and hearings , both british and non-british. Since I left I have kept in touch with former colleagues who are now lifelong friends, some are British, some aren't, it wasn't a factor in whether we became friends or not.

I only mention all of that simply because a lot of remain voters think we have no positive outlook on immigrants and we don't mix in a multi-cultural society. They also think we don't understand the positive impact on the economy migrants (EU and non-EU) have. But actually most leave voters do, immigrants pay far more in to the system than they take out in benefits, that's a long standing, well known fact. There are far more british people who falsely claim benefits compared to immigrants.

Unfortunately I will admit there are parts of society, some of which voted leave who don't understand these truths. Some through lack of education, some through lack of life experience with people of diverse backgrounds and some sadly who are racist. These are the people who already felt poor, cut-off and unheard. UKIP and other politicians preyed on those peoples fears and told them they could help fix their problems.

That is not however the majority of leave supporters, I truly believe that. Most leave supporters have had experiences like mine and we all have experienced nothing but positive things from working and living with immigrants, EU and non-EU.

If the EU could have done one thing with immigration then I wish it gave all EU member states the ability to put a temporary block or cap on EU migration. I say this for the simple fact that the UK and other countries don't have the housing, schools and hospitals to cope with the current UK (not british) population growth, we simply aren't building enough of anything. When you add over 300,000 immigrants to that population growth you start to see the strain it creates.

I think the UK can cope with immigration well above 200,000, when it has the infrastructure in place, until then a temporary reduction or block until the work is done would be a useful tool to have. Alternatively you could look at using builders from the EU countries who could then come and work on those very buildings that are needed.

Finally on immigration, I think Governments in all EU countries need to act more responsibly on where and how immigrants are placed in to communities. Dumping some of the poorest immigrants in the poorest parts of the UK next to communities who are experiencing crime, unemployment and disillusionment with life in general and their prospects, is a disaster waiting to happen, especially when some of those people are known racists.

UK employers, EU employers and landlords in and out of the EU also need to be challenged more on their blatant exploitation of immigrants.

Ok flame away!

OP posts:
caitlinohara · 30/06/2016 13:20

I liked the EU for the fact countries were forced to compromise with each other without going to war over it. That was, indeed, the original intention, and it's a lovely image. So if being a member really is all one big fondue party, why is there such growing discontent amongst member states? Because people don't like centralised European-wide government. They don't like being told what to do by those they haven't elected. If it had been kept as simply a single market with negotiable rules, it might have worked. The mistake was to try to make it a political union, which is not what was promised. I'm sorry that you feel such despair, but you must understand that not everyone shares it.

caitlinohara · 30/06/2016 13:24

previously we were mostly united against the banks and the government I think the Labour opposition are missing a trick there. If they are saying that the Tories and UKIP have led us to financial ruin, they should be up there pointing out that it was the Tories' fault for calling a referendum in the first place and risking it, thus discrediting them as a party. It's an obvious strategy, and the silly fcukers are too busy fretting about Corbyn to use it.

roundaboutthetown · 30/06/2016 13:32

caitlin - I think you'll find there is growing discontent because of the austerity imposed on countries throughout the world as a result of the financial crisis, caused not by the EU or even the previous labour government, but by financial institutions which this country supports at all costs. Why do you not understand that there always has to be a bogeyman? The real unelected power which pulls the strings is not the EU, it's the international money markets...

citroenpresse · 30/06/2016 13:43

And what do we do when we get more civil disobedience? Because mental health is not a priority spending area for the NHS or the frustrations of voted leavers realise that their expectations are not going to be met? There is no silver bullet. But unless there is a change of government, with increases in corporation tax, there won't be any extra cash either. We won't be spending the money we 'save' because there are no 'savings'. The WTO trading option has already been discounted. The 'Norway model' costs the same as we already pay. The costs of being in the EU without any of the benefits. And when our neighbours crow about the volume of regeneration funding they have received, or the number of jobs that have been created because, since the UK has exited Europe, money has flowed elsewhere, how is that going to go down? What are all you leavers voting FOR?

merrymouse · 01/07/2016 06:16

what are all you leavers voting FOR?

That is definitely the trillion dollar question.

However, I think the problem with heavily blaming the Tories for calling the referendum is that it will alienate the 52% who voted out, whatever they thought they were voting for, and sounds like whinging rather than taking charge.

lacurandera · 01/07/2016 06:31

Basically this. As a trading area I guess it made some sort of sense. As an unaccountable institution making laws for a continent, it's unacceptable.

Why I Voted to Leave the EU
stilllovingmysleep · 01/07/2016 06:34

Merrymouse they are not voting for anything, I think this was a protest vote mostly caused by various things (including austerity). I also don't buy the whole 'undemocratic commissioners' idea, I really believe that that on its own would not have galvanized so many people were it not for the immigration issue which always comes up even in the most well meaning of posts.

In terms of the European Union, one thing that I find upsetting is that in none of the remain campaignsand in most of the things we write about here on MNthere is no mention of the Second World War, the idea of the far right potential / danger within Europe & the wish for cooperation & peace within European countries. That is how the EU began, that was the idea, and even though politics & economics have in some ways got in the way, that would have been a message to stand behind. Instead, Corbyn decided to go down the route of neutrality & that was I think a big mistake. There needed to be a bigger message that could inspire people to think of Europe as a force for peace, but it never came through. (And before you say anything, yes of course I agree that the EU has made shambles of the crises in the south of the continent but that doesn't mean we cannot keep fighting for a better Europe: the alternative is ghastly, rise of the far right all across the continent which the UK is tragically leading the way with atm).

Sierra259 · 01/07/2016 06:43

Just wanted to come and say that I have found this thread very enlightening. I would still vote Remain, but it is refreshing to read some carefully thought out reasoning for Leave, rather than the usual soundbites trotted out in the media and in other areas.

Now I just wish our elected leaders would get their thumbs out of their collective backsides and start getting on with things. The way both main parties have behaved in the aftermath is appalling.

stilllovingmysleep · 01/07/2016 06:46

Sierra the fact that the arguments on Leave on this thread are written politely & non-fanatically is great, but that does not make them 'carefully reasoned' arguments or at leastto put it mildlythey are completely misguided & for the most part very easily argued against. I do hope the government doesn't go ahead with this madness.

lacurandera · 01/07/2016 06:56

Ah, another "Ignore democracy, I didn't get what I wanted" post. Never get sick of those.....

HelpfulChap · 01/07/2016 07:12

I find it interesting that so many Remain voters appear willing to discard democracy if it doesn't tally with their viewpoint.

Stilllovingmysleep · 01/07/2016 07:22

Would you say the same if there had been a referendum voting for something like fascism or a far right idea? Would we then not have the obligation to wonder about whether such a result should be followed? Remember, nazism in Germany as well as many far right movements were voted in democratically. So no I don't respect the 'majority' in this, I think they are wrong, misguided and leading us down a dangerous path. Already I've had friends (not English, long term residents of the U.K.) being verbally abused and told to 'go home' by some low life thugs on Monday. I'm not prepared to accept any of this and think we should all be fighting against it with all that we've got.

roundaboutthetown · 01/07/2016 07:25

No, don't discard democracy - have a general election now to decide who should be responsible for voting us out. It's undemocratic not to ask the British public who they want to negotiate their way out of this, given the fact there are so many conflicting reasons for having voted to leave. If that results in a rise of extremist parties, then so be it, eh? I hope all you democracy defenders are pushing for this and not just supporting democracy when it suits your agenda.

As for lacurandera's picture - only a complete idiot would think they could do something that hastens the demise of all their main trading partners without finding it pulls them under, too.

Roonerspism · 01/07/2016 07:44

OP - and Bell you summarised all my reasons

I also didn't really pay much attention to the personalities involved, of even the rhetoric on either side. I have known for years that if I had the chance, I would be out. I did a lot of my own reading

At its most basic, the EU no longer made any sense to me. I look at things sometimes as if I'm a bird flying above a situation - the EU had become nonsensical. There was no chance of change and it was my once in a lifetime chance to get out.

I felt very sad last Friday. Like I was leaving a marriage that I had tried to save. The uncertainty has been entirely expected.

If I was the next leader, I would probably go for interim membership of the EEA to buy time. There is the huge issue of a fracturing EU to contend with and collapsing Eurozone - so what we are negotiating with now may look very different in a few years.

shinynewusername · 01/07/2016 07:49

Sigh, the EU is not unaccountable. If anything, it is too accountable.

All big decisions have to be made unanimously by the elected leaders of the member nations. This is why it takes a long time to reach decisions and there is always considerable compromise because getting the representatives of 500 million people to agree on anything is difficult. But it ensures that every important decision has the support of the entire EU.

Every single significant decision that has been made since we entered what is now the EU, has agreed by the elected Prime Minister of the time, lacurandera, the only exceptions being the areas (e.g. Schengen) where the UK has been allowed to opt out.

And your cartoon is vile.

fusionconfusion · 01/07/2016 08:00

I agree that cartoon is vile. If people had taken such a view in the previous World Wars, where would we be now? It all seems so small and narrow minded in the context of massive global unrest.

I wish we had more of a sense of global citizenship than "I believe we can stand on our own". Maybe we can, who knows? I'm just not sure this is a fabulous value for people living on a very tiny planet, where there's already far too much bloodshed and destruction because of people fusing with very tight, small definitions of Who They Are and what this means about how they can treat others who are Not Us.

Sierra259 · 01/07/2016 08:03

stillloving I don't agree. I think some of these are reasoned arguments and agree that the EU is deeply flawed. I also think that it benefits us far more than it disadvantages us, and I have not been swayed by the Leavers on here. But that is my personal viewpoint based on my limited knowledge and experience - I can accept that other people have different priorities or greater insight in some areas than I do while still disagreeing with them.

fusionconfusion · 01/07/2016 08:06

I also agree with this:

"What are all you leavers voting FOR?"

Because I think the EU is not a great institution either, it needs huge reform and there are problems brewing - absolutely. However, what's the value here? What is this moving TOWARDS? It all seems to be about what we need to move AWAY from.. but that's just running, not engaging.

I want to hear what this means England and Wales stand for. What are the strong values that underpin it, that say what England and Wales are about? What is important, what do they stand for ON THE GLOBAL STAGE? How are they going to take committed action to make changes to the current world order that benefits not only local or parochial interests but recognises there's no going back from global politics and plans for this in ways that are positive, proactive and creative? WHAT IS THE PLAN?

shinynewusername · 01/07/2016 08:14

I agree that cartoon is vile. If people had taken such a view in the previous World Wars, where would we be now?

People taking this view is exactly why we had 2 world wars in the first place.

SnowBells · 01/07/2016 08:17

lacurandra Your cartoon is vile. I hope you're actually a decent person in real life.

I second shiny. The EU is not some big superstate Rupert Murdoch would want you to believe. If anything, it's a little slow because all the different states need to agree on things. The reason some member states are disgruntled is because... well, people don't like to compromise. But that's exactly what's needed to keep peace.

You can see it in this forum, right? Some people are Remainers. Then, you have Leavers who couldn't care less about immigration and just voted for the principle of being sovereign. You have people for whom immigration was the primary reason for voting Leave. Then, you have people who thought we should spend the money we give away on us.

To please us Remainers will be easy (all the government just has to do is Remain). To please the Leavers will be difficult, because they all want different things. The anti-immigration leavers will be sorely disappointed, the people who wanted us to spend £350m on the NHS will be disappointed, too (who the f*ck believed that shit?). You could potentially please ones who voted based on "principle", but they are few and far between.

I said this many times before, but why do we teach our children teamwork and compromise, when as a whole, the U.K. Wants to be selfish and go it alone like a bratty child?

dabofriojakitten · 01/07/2016 08:27

That cartoon is hilarious, I especially like the "political correctness" shark Confused.

Look, Britain is no better or worse than any other country, it's just people living on a bit of land, people who bang on about sovereignty seem to think we're somehow a much greater country than the rest of Europe and deserve to not be bossed around, it's bollocks, unions are a good thing and whilst there are undoubtably issues with the eu, to think we can stand on our own two feet outside the single market and thrive is frankly naive.

"Make Britain great again", when was it so great? I do fear people are referring to the days of the British empire or something which is all kinds of worrying.

alreadytaken · 01/07/2016 08:38

one point that no-one has mentioned yet - the remainers talk about the EU as if it was set in stone. It had - possibly now being amended - plans to change. It wanted closer financial unity with control over the budget of member countries, an army, shared welfare payments. Since both sides were intent on making this campaign about lies and bullying it was impossible ever to have a sensible discussion about where the EU was going, whether Britain could ever exert any influence on this - and we've been pathetic at that in the past - and the price to be paid for leaving. And yes I know part of the being pathetic was UKIP but it was also down to leaders who are used to bullying rather than cooperating. Cameron couldnt negotiate a good deal because he isnt a negotiator.

Many remainers voted for this referendum by voting for the greedy party. They seem to be of the type I've done well out of the EU, I'm not thinking about the future direction of the EU at all and I dont care about those uneducated peasants outside London. That has been apparent all over social media, including mumsnet. Now they face what the rest of the country has been facing and I have no doubt they will continue the path of greed to make sure they sure they suffer the least for it.

shinynewusername · 01/07/2016 08:48

Now they face what the rest of the country has been facing and I have no doubt they will continue the path of greed to make sure they sure they suffer the least for it

So it is good idea to drag us all into recession, to make the rich suffer? And yet, at the same time you acknowledge that they won't.

roundaboutthetown · 01/07/2016 08:56

alreadytaken - I think you'll find the flaw in your analysis there is that it is the "greedy party" that has always been the most pro- leaving the EU... largely because they feel it will increase their ability to enrich themselves at the expense of others.

SnowBells · 01/07/2016 09:56

shiny

Apparently, it's called "altruistic punishment". There's some article out there somewhere...

alreadytaken
They seem to be of the type I've done well out of the EU, I'm not thinking about the future direction of the EU at all and I dont care about those uneducated peasants outside London. That has been apparent all over social media, including mumsnet. Now they face what the rest of the country has been facing and I have no doubt they will continue the path of greed to make sure they sure they suffer the least for it.

To this I say:

  1. Yes, I don't deny there are some people in this camp, just like there are some racists in the Leavers camp.

  2. I don't mind an ever-closer union. Why are people so paranoid about that? Is it because of the island mentality? Are we always meant to be paranoid about those mean people across the sea?

  3. Weird. The one farming couple I do know voted Remain, because they rely on EU subsidies. Leavers fucked them up royally. I guess Leavers don't care about the peasants on the land.

  4. Stop thinking that us Remainers are making the poor people suffer. We will be worse off outside the EU - and guess what, it will impact the poor more than anyone else. People who are wealthy will obviously suffer, but what's the first thing people do when they know money is sparse? They tighten their belts. They will stop spending money in shops and restaurants, which will impact both - shopkeepers and suppliers (i.e. farmers, fishermen, etc.). They will stop buying expensive "artisan" goods made in the UK which will impact several communities far out of London. They will stop spending money on weekends away in the country, etc. These are "discretionary products" that can be given up easily, but on which many communities outside London rely.