BelleSauvage I agree that you need to have a good understanding of not only what nursing care your DF needs now and in the near future but in the coming weeks and months if it can be predicted. Needs can change very quickly, anyone of 87 years who has had disordered swallowing, may have underlying dementia and is a falls risk could need nursing again at any point. I understand your thinking that your DF would prefer to be in a bungalow near you with carers coming in, it's similar to the scenario I imagined for my DM, but in my case it was built more on an optimistic ideal than reality.
I organised an excellent care company to come in to my DM's bungalow daily, and it seemed for a few weeks that it would be the solution but: DM was a falls risk and had cognitive impairment, she was frail and unsafe and I quickly realised that unless she could afford 24-hour carers coming in, she was not coping or safe and I was very stressed. The hours between carers became uncertain hours when I could expect the careline or a medic to call me to turn out or solve something, and there's only so much of that you can take.
Because 24-hour personal care is so expensive and will need to be self-funded, I didn't really consider it, it would have eaten through DM's money far quicker than a very good care home and you don't know how long someone will live. Even if the 24-hour care was possible, I realised DM needed to be with people, not just sitting in her own home (I live a long distance away) and waiting for the next carer. You may imagine filling the gaps between carers but that is a full-time job and also, as you say, managing carers is also a job: I am very used to complex admin and the agency themselves were very on the ball but I was living Mum's schedule and still fielding calls (from her, from the carers) daily about the care itself, as well as using a daily tracking app and keeping a second schedule for all DM's appointments - carers can do quite a lot but there are limits as to what an agency allows them to do.
After a fall, my DM went to a very good care home (the CQC reports are online) where she was able to be in a social world she could cope with, and all her care needs were met and, most importantly, she was safe. She absolutely needed to be looked after rather than maintain some 'independence' by having periods of not being looked after. In my DM's care home, there are former teachers and business people, prolific readers and film-buffs - and if they happen nod off mid sentence, it's OK. It's also OK when dementia changes them (no 'dementia floor' or other segregation) and there are lots of social activities. Some care homes are also nursing homes but unless someone needs nursing decisions and actions to be taken more or less daily on their behalf, nurses can come in to any care home, as can doctors, opticians, podiatrists and even dentists. And, as I've found, a care home generally provides a safe base for end-of-life care, without the need for hospital.
If I was making decisions all over again, I would never have gone the home care route except as a temporary holding pattern for the care home, which it turned out to be. I don't know if any of that is useful but I think my main point is the care-at-home route can be fraught and relatively short-lived after a certain age.