Hi, it’s been a while since I posted on here, and I’ve name changed since then. Sorry that this is a long post.
I’m looking for a bit of perspective / advice. Up until November, mum lived independently at home. She had very limited mobility, and was very confused. She refused any support from social services, and wouldn’t discuss giving me power of attorney because she was “very smart”.
Inevitably, in November, she fell. She broke her ankle and has been in hospital since then. Social services have assessed her and decided she doesn’t have capacity, and are proceeding on a “best interest “ basis. She is being moved to a care home shortly - hopefully on a temporary basis.
My issue is this: she is desperate to go home. Every time she speaks to family she cries and asks why she can’t go home with carers. The only way she could do that is with live-in carers, which will cost minimum £1000 a week. I have no authority over her finances, but I think her savings would cover that for a maximum of 6 months, but I can’t have a sensible conversation about money with her.
I’m sticking with the official line, which is that once she is able to get herself to the toilet at night she can go home with visiting carers. But I feel a bit unfair, and wonder if she should just be allowed to spend the money and then worry about what happens when it runs out. But of course she doesn’t really understand what she’d be agreeing to.
Thanks if you’ve read all this! Family all live a minimum of 5 hours away. I’ve managed to get to see her reasonably often, but now I’ve got health issues of my own which mean I may not be able to travel for a while.
If we privately funded live-in carers what would happen when the money ran out? Sorry if that is a naive question!