violethill - I can relate to needing your income. I need at least a part-time income, so home ed would also impact on my (I'm sure happy to help) parents - but still, I'd possibly feel as though I was putting upon them. And I have a couple of hobbies without which I would be miserable and no fun for a home educated DS to live with anyway.
I agree that an important part of life is learning to push oneself beyond one's comfort zone. BUT I would echo what Litchick says: grown-ups have to do this too sometimes, but they almost always have choices in the matter in a way that children don't. We could choose to do a crappy job for a while, or choose to get out of a job (or other situation) that's become crappy, once we'd done all we could to rectify it. Having and exercising these choices teach self-respect, self-agency and responsibility. A child often doesn't choose to go to school; doesn't choose which school he or she goes to; and doesn't have the choice to get out of a school setting if it doesn't suit him or her. I think, rather than learning to push beyond their comfort zones, there is a danger of these children - who feel miserable in school and also utterly stuck there - ultimately feeling disempowered and hopeless.
This all applies to extreme unhappiness at school of course, because I think you hit the nail on the head with the idea of compromise. If your son isn't school-phobic and muddles along OK, and him doing this enables you to feel fulfilled in your work and to have enough income for the family, it probably has to be this way. If you gave up your work so your son could be happy being home educated, but you felt unfulfilled and resentful - you would be dishonouring yourself, and that would set him a crap example.
So yes, I suppose it has to be about compromise - and that's a good lesson for children to learn.
Lindenlass and TeenyTinyToria - that is interesting. That's the sort of thing I was wondering about - if teaching kids in a school setting, and particularly with all the relatively recent changes to teaching (constraints of national curriculum, teaching to test, etc) which no one seems terribly happy about, would mean teachers might be more likely to entertain home ed for their own children.
Interesting stuff. Thanks for posts.