Those with EHCPs should have a phase transfer review in the autumn term of Y6. As part of that process, you get the chance to state your preferred school.
Unless your preferred school is wholly independent, the LA must name it unless the LA can prove:
-The setting is unsuitable for the age, ability, aptitude or special educational needs (“SEN”) of the child or young person; or
-The attendance of the child or young person would be incompatible with the provision of efficient education for others; or
-The attendance of the child or young person would be incompatible with the efficient use of resources.
The bar to prove one of these is higher than LAs and some schools admit. Unless the LA can prove one of the above, the school must be named even if the school objects. Although it isn’t unusual for LAs to refuse and force parents to appeal. Equally, A positive consult doesn’t mean the LA will agree to name the school. The LA may force you to appeal. Being outside of the normal catchment area doesn’t prevent a school being named on the EHCP, it is a separate process to normal admissions.
For wholly independent schools, mainstream and specialist, your/DC’s wishes/views must be considered. You need an offer of a place and to prove the LA’s proposed school(s) can’t meet needs &/or it isn’t unreasonable public expenditure. Sadly, many have to appeal.
Smaller class sizes need to be defined because special educational provision in F of EHCPs needs to be detailed, specified and quantified, but it absolutely can be a reason for an independent mainstream school to be named.
Right now, focus on the test for an EHCNA. The threshold for an EHCNA is relatively low - a) has or may have SEN, and b) may need special educational provision to be made via an EHCP. Any other test, such as needing 2+ APDR cycles, the school needing to have spent £6k, needing an EP assessment first, DD being X amount of years behind, needing other needs because not having EHCPs for ‘only’ dyslexia… is unlawful.