I am a parent. I think the children, who fared the best during the pandemic had parents, who were not too fazed by the pandemic and were free to talk and able to help out with work if necessary. This was also important for teens and to still be connected to their parents on an emotional level, rather than just their friends.
I also think that schools had a part to play in this. Some secondary schools offered regular live lessons, others offered few to none. Some schools offered lots of mental health support, checking in with the students, some little to none.
My dd’s school was in the latter category for both. Dd was given vast amounts of work, far more than had she been at school and far more than all the other surrounding schools. Fine for dd, she accomplished it all, right down to her PE lessons. Very difficult for some of her friends, who were turned off learning.
The school has a big problem with feral kids, exacerbated by the pandemic. Dd was yr7 first lockdown and her year had already been identified as a particularly difficult year. Lockdown imo from an educational and developmental perspective was especially hard on yr7 because there is a big jump between years 6 and 7. Instead of the school guiding the students through, they were at the age of being expected to get on with it, with many, who basically couldn’t.
As for little princes and princesses, I agree with you there on an anecdotal level. Two girls from dd’s former primary, who are now out of mainstream education fit this category. I only knew one of them very well. She had a lot of mental health issues already as she was dd’s best friend. She pushed a lot of boundaries, dd said she was stealing (at 11) and not treating dd particularly well. Her online behaviour was worrying at times but I couldn’t go to her mum for she systematically made things worse and helped to make her dd a bullying target.