Thanks for the answer, Kangamummy.
As a general point - and not referring to piffle or anyone else - I do feel uneasy with the idea that an 11 year old's future is being mapped out for years ahead.
I have no problem with gifted and talented programmes. I am sure they fill a great need a amongst bright children. I do have a problem with an assumption that being on a G&T programme determines a child's future academic path. Is this a common assumption - it has cropped up on this thread, but don't know if this is unusual? Is is something parents, teachers or the children themselves tend to assume? Do teachers on the gifted and talented programme tell 11 year olds they could be destined for top universities? I hope not.
I think, if my son was on a gifted and talented programme I'd want him to make the most of it for now, enjoy it for what it is, and not worry about the future - and not see the gifted and talented programme as determining his academic future. There's such a gulf of experience between an 11 year old and an 18 year old - so much can happen. I remember several very bright and high achieving girls at my old grammar school who flunked A levels, left before A levels, dropped out of university due to pressure, hormones, bad luck - all sorts of reasons. And if my future had been set at age 11 I would never have got to grammar school in the first place, as I failed my 11+!
My teachers put me in for the 13+ ( no pressure to do this from my parents) and I passed it and changed schools.
Another small point, some posters have said how much easier it is for parents to talk about sporting success as opposed to academic success. I don't think this is necessarily so. Granted I don't have a brilliant athlete or genius for a son so can't speak from experience. However, recently several people in cricket teams, seeing my son play, have told my husband that ds1 has a 'gift' - he can, apparently spin bowl in a very unusual way that cannot be taught. Don't know much more for now. It might be nothing. I feel awkward about broadcasting this small piece of news and would certainly not bring it up in conversation with parents in real life.