Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Covid

Mumsnet doesn't verify the qualifications of users. If you have medical concerns, please consult a healthcare professional.

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

Why am I so ill despite being fully vaccinated

185 replies

Wherecanitbe · 31/03/2022 06:26

I have tested positive for Covid and I have never felt so ill. I do not have any underlying health conditions, so why do I feel so unwell if I have had all my vaccines?

OP posts:
hamstersarse · 10/04/2022 11:43

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk guidelines.

leafyygreens · 10/04/2022 12:09

@hamstersarse

The latest - that vaccination makes people sicker with COVID - was what I was originally replying to. But I thought it made sense to put the post in context with the other kinds of posts

But again you misrepresent this.
The VAED risk is included in Pfizer’s own documents about as an “important potential risk”

Which part of talking about this is misinformation? It is a theoretical possibility, still. Indeed recent article in Nature suggests signs of ADE 🤷‍♀️

www.nature.com/articles/s41586-022-04702-4

Is nature a peddler of misinformation?

As many posters have told you, and I did in my last reply, that theoretical concern was posed over a year ago. This surveillance period has be conducted and futher reporting published. Absolutely no evidence for this has been found - vaccination is not making people more ill with COVID.Yet you choose to post on a theoretical concern posed over a year ago whilst ignoring all the updated evidence showing safety.
leafyygreens · 10/04/2022 12:12

Which part of talking about this is misinformation? It is a theoretical possibility, still. Indeed recent article in Nature suggests signs of ADE 🤷‍♀️

www.nature.com/articles/s41586-022-04702-4

Have you read the paper? Or just copied and pasted the link from bitchute? It says nothing of the sort, and actually finds evidence to the opposite of what you're claiming.

Here is the main conclusion.

"Our findings, which implicate opsonizing antibodies in monocyte infection and inflammasome activation, suggest that antibodies may contribute to deleterious immune reactions associated with
severe disease45. FcγR-mediated monocyte infection is an example of
antibody-mediated enhancement (ADE) of infection. Nonetheless, overwhelming evidence shows that vaccine-generated neutralizing antibodies prevent infection and improve clinical outcome of breakthroughinfections, suggesting that anti-spike antibodies are highly beneficial. Plasma from vaccinated individuals did not promote monocyte infection, indicating that ADE is not a concern with respect to vaccination. "

Robinni · 10/04/2022 13:10

@hamstersarse wasn’t the topic of this thread “why am I so sick despite being fully vaccinated?”
Answer: differences in genetics, point when vaccinated, waning immunity of vaccine and numerous other factors of host/virus/environment that contribute to various outcomes in individuals.

How has this turned into a pro-vax, anti-vac debate? Can people not stick to topic?!

Firstly, I find it alarming that you are using an accelerated preview article to substantiate points; it hasn’t been fully peer reviewed. Secondly, I would advise that you READ the paper that you have quoted as it directly contradicts the point you are trying to make re. vaccination and ADE….. in fact it refutes it:-

“ Plasma from vaccinated individuals did not promote monocyte infec- tion, indicating that ADE is not a concern with respect to vaccination”

There are concerns related to administration of antibodies to patients suffering from Covid outlined.

The authors themselves point out that the number of people included in the study (10 healthy and 60 covid) is too small.
“Larger cohorts are needed to better assess the relative importance of monocyte/macrophage pyroptosis in severe COVID-19 pathogenesis.”

For anyone not versed in cellular biology who does not fancy wading through the entire paper, here are the bits pertinent to the pro-vax/anti-vax argument:-

The paper’s focus is to elucidate the pathogenesis of covid specifically how excessive inflammation occurs.

They found that 6% of blood monocytes in COVID-19 patients are infected with SARS-CoV-2 and results suggest that antibody-mediated SARS-CoV-2 uptake by monocytes/macrophages triggers inflammatory cell death that aborts production of infectious virus but causes systemic inflammation that contributes to COVID-19 pathogenesis.

To assess whether disease severity or antibodies raised by vaccina- tion increased monocyte virus uptake, LPS-activated monocytes were infected in the presence of pooled plasma from uninfected donors, mRNA vaccine recipients or COVID-19 patients with mild or severe disease. Importantly, uninfected HD and post-vaccination plasma did not facilitate virus uptake or replication, even though plasma anti-RBD IgG was ~2-fold higher in HD vaccine recipients (6.5±1.1 μg/ml) than in COVID-19 patients (3.6±0.5 μg/ml) (Fig. 4f, g). However, non-COVID-19 patient pooled plasma slightly increased infection, but the increase was not significant, suggesting possible inefficient viral uptake by some non-COVID plasma component. Disease severity did not affect infection by COVID-19 patient plasma since pooled mild and/or severe plasma similarly facilitated infection.

Our findings, which implicate opsonizing antibodies in mono- cyte infection and inflammasome activation, suggest that antibod- ies may contribute to deleterious immune reactions associated with severe disease45. FcγR-mediated monocyte infection is an example of antibody-mediated enhancement (ADE) of infection. Nonetheless, over- whelming evidence shows that vaccine-generated neutralizing antibod- ies prevent infection and improve clinical outcome of breakthrough infections, suggesting that anti-spike antibodies are highly beneficial. Plasma from vaccinated individuals did not promote monocyte infec- tion, indicating that ADE is not a concern with respect to vaccination. Therapeutically administered anti-spike neutralizing monoclonal anti- bodies, however, only improve clinical outcome if given early, before hospitalization46,47, and antibody-containing convalescent sera have not shown clinical benefit48. Thus, it is worth considering whether some antibodies might have both protective and deleterious effects49. Anti- bodies are clearly beneficial for blocking infection of ACE2-expressing lung and airway epithelia, where the virus completes replication to produce infectious progeny. However, antibody properties that affect FcR-mediated cellular uptake, phagocytosis, cytotoxicity and comple-
28 ment activation, can affect disease pathogenesis.

wiccaqueen123 · 10/04/2022 13:14

It may be a different variant X...

Robinni · 10/04/2022 13:16

Please. If people are going to come on mumsnet and the like quoting scientific information as armchair experts. PLEASE READ the information that you are quoting and understand how to assess a paper for its validity. BEFORE spouting absolute nonsense to the general public who - unsurprisingly - are hugely confused by the overwhelming volume of information being thrown at them over this.

Try and be accurate.

leafyygreens · 10/04/2022 13:24

@Robinni

Please. If people are going to come on mumsnet and the like quoting scientific information as armchair experts. PLEASE READ the information that you are quoting and understand how to assess a paper for its validity. BEFORE spouting absolute nonsense to the general public who - unsurprisingly - are hugely confused by the overwhelming volume of information being thrown at them over this.

Try and be accurate.

It is quite common for various disinformation groups to make scary claims & then link to a manuscript or other type of evidence. A good was a wet lab conference abstract used to "prove" that vaccines cause cardiac complications. Claims from it are still heavily cited despite the numerous problems with doing so.

If someone was to actually read the evidence provided, they would find that either the paper makes no such claim, or that is such a huge degree of methodological or other issue that it cannot be used as evidence at all. However, these groups depend on the fact that people will not, or do not have the scientific knowledge to do so.

This is how you end up with various papers being linked all over SM and forums like MN, with people making wildly inaccurate and sprurious inferences.

Robinni · 10/04/2022 13:30

Absolutely horrid it’s going on. I don’t mind debate where the data is sound. But inaccurately presenting information such as the above poster did is scaremongering.

rhizobium · 13/04/2022 08:51

Glad the most recent crap from that specific poster has been removed, but not sure why MN are ok for this to continue to go on for 2+ years from one specific poster.

In theory I agree health misinformation should be debated rather than removed, but what's the point when someone repeatedly makes scaremongering claims, posts personal attacks when people ask for further information, and then disappears when it becomes clear they're not able to make any kind of rationale argument.

They then reappear under a different username, and repeat the same sorry cycle over and over again!

Tynetime · 13/04/2022 21:24

ICU admissions for COVID 19 data definitely still indicate vaccination protects against ICU Admissions.

Why am I so ill despite being fully vaccinated
New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Swipe left for the next trending thread